Occurrence of Juvenile Paralichthys lethostigma (Southern
Flounder) in Tributaries of Chesapeake Bay
Sean C. Lusk, Brian E. Watkins, Ashleigh Rhea, Casey B. Dillman, and Eric J. Hilton
Southeastern Naturalist, Volume 13, Issue 3 (2014): 515–522
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)
Southeastern Naturalist
515
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
22001144 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 1V3o(3l.) :1531,5 N–5o2. 23
Occurrence of Juvenile Paralichthys lethostigma (Southern
Flounder) in Tributaries of Chesapeake Bay
Sean C. Lusk1,*, Brian E. Watkins2, Ashleigh Rhea2, Casey B. Dillman2,
and Eric J. Hilton2
Abstract - Paralichthys lethostigma (Southern Flounder) inhabits the continental shelf and
estuarine waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the east coast of the North Atlantic, from peninsular
Florida to Albemarle Sound in North Carolina. Between 30 May and 20 August 2012,
we collected 15 juvenile (71–192 mm) Southern Flounder in fyke nets in the Mattaponi
River, a tributary of the York River, in southeastern Virginia. This is the first known documentation
of juvenile Southern Flounder in any tributary of Chesapeake Bay. We confirmed
our identification of the specimens as Southern Flounder morphologically and genetically
by counting gill rakers and sequencing cytochrome oxidase subunit I, respectively.
Introduction
Paralichthys lethostigma Jordan and Gilbert (Southern Flounder) is a member
of the family Paralichthyidae, the left-eyed flounders. It is characterized by extreme
lateral compression, with both eyes located on the left side of the body, and dark
brown mottled pigmentation on the left side of the body; it can be distinguished
from other members of the family through a combination of meristic data (e.g., fin
ray and gill-raker counts). This carnivorous species inhabits the continental shelf
and estuarine waters of the western North Atlantic (McEachran and Fechhelm 2005,
Murdy and Musick 2013, Murdy et al. 1997). Adults migrate to the continental shelf
to spawn in the fall (Gi1bert 1986), and once eggs have hatched, larvae are carried
to estuaries and coastal rivers by inshore currents (Guindon and Miller 1995).
Juvenile Southern Flounder live in estuaries and rivers for approximately 2 years
(Daniels 2000), feeding primarily on plankton, macroinvertebrates, and small fishes,
after which they reach spawning age (Van Maaren and Daniels 2008). Southern
flounder are sought by both commercial and recreational fishermen along the Gulf
and eastern coasts of the US (Stokes 1977) and are a managed species throughout
their range.
Southern Flounder are distributed along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, from
the southern tip of Texas to Caloosahatchee River in Florida, and on the Atlantic
coast from the Loxahatchee River in Florida to Albemarle Sound in North Carolina
(Fischer and Thompson 2004). This species inhabits shallow bays, estuaries, and
rivers that are characterized by mud and silt substrates. Adult Southern Flounder are
known to stray into the southern regions of Chesapeake Bay during late summer and
1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061. 2Department of Fisheries Science, Virginia Institute
of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA 23062. *Corresponding author - slusk@vt.edu.
Manuscript Editor: Jennifer Rehage
Southeastern Naturalist
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
516
early fall (Murdy and Musick 2013). Several individuals have been encountered
between August and November (2007–2009) during electroshocking surveys in the
Pamunkey, James, and Chickahominy rivers (Virginia) conducted by the Virginia
Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) (B. Greenlee, VDGIF, Charles
City, VA, pers. comm.), as well as the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS)
Juvenile Fish and Blue Crab Trawl Survey (VIMS 4750; collected at the mouth of
the James River in August 2009). Between May and August 2012, researchers with
the American Shad Monitoring Program at VIMS collected several juvenile Southern
Flounder in fyke nets in the tidal freshwater reaches of the Mattaponi River, a
tributary of the York River in Virginia. The purpose of this paper is to document and
discuss the occurrence of this southern species in tributaries of Chesapeake Bay.
Field Station Description
The Mattaponi River joins the Pamunkey River at West Point, VA, to form the
York River, and collectively the 3 rivers form the York River System (YRS). We
sampled in the Mattaponi River between Melrose Landing and Walkerton, VA,
in the river’s numerous tidal freshwater marshes. Sediments in tidal freshwater
marshes in this area are dominated by silt, with vegetation comprising mainly Peltandra
virginica (L.) Schott (Green Arrow-arum), Leersia oryzoides (L.) Sw. (Rice
Cutgrass), and Bidens spp. (beggarticks) (Priest et al 1987).
Our sampling stations were as follows: station 1 (Walkerton Landing) river mile
(RM) 53 (37°43.4' N, 77°01.0'W); station 2 (upriver of Garnetts Creek), RM 49
(37°41.4' N, 76°57.5'W); station 3 (Sandy Point), RM 46 (37°40.9'N, 76°55.0'W);
station 4 (Wakema), RM 43 (37°39.3' N, 76°53.5'W); and station 5 (Melrose Landing),
RM 41 (37°38.6' N, 77°52'W) (Fig. 1). Station 1 is located on the southern
bank of an island closest to the northern bank of the river and experiences a major
growth of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle (Hydrilla) and other submerged aquatic
vegetation (SAV) in mid- to late summer. Station 2 is located on the southern bank
of the river near the mouth of a large creek, but there is little or no SAV growth.
Station 3 is located on the northern bank of the river on a small flat just above a
steep drop-off. Station 4 is located close to the mouth of a creek, and station 5 is
located on the southern bank of the river on the northern bank of a small island; this
fifth station experiences little to no SAV. Typical of freshwater tidal marshes in the
region, all stations have a silt-dominated substrate.
Methods
Sampling
We sampled for 15 weeks during 15 May–21 August 2012 by setting fyke nets
at the 5 stations. Electroshocking and trawling were used sporadically to supplement
the fyke nets at the 5 stations and to sample different portions of the river that
contained suitable habitat for Southern Flounder (i.e., silt and mud substrates associated
with areas of aquatic vegetation). We constructed fyke nets out of 6.35-mm
(0.25-inch)-mesh netting. Each net consisted of a 15.2-m leader, two 7.6-m wings,
Southeastern Naturalist
517
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
4 hoops, 2 throats, and 1 cab. Each fyke net was set perpendicular to the shore
with the leader running on shore and wings running at a 45° angle from the leader.
We set all nets at low tide and fished during the first low tide of the following day
(tides and weather permitting) to complete a 24-hour set; nets were removed after
fishing (n = 5 fyke nets deployed). We identified all species collected in the fyke
nets and transported Southern Flounder to the laboratory for further processing. We
recorded surface water temperature (°C) and salinity (ppm) at each of the 5 stations
on the day the fyke nets were deployed and on the day the fyke nets were fished.
We conducted electroshocking on 12 July 2012 in the Mattaponi River and
20 June 2012 on Back Bay in southeastern Virginia. We employed a 5.59-m
(19’) aluminum Clark electrofishing boat (Clark Boat Company, Bellevue, IA)
equipped with a double-electrode array, each with 6 droppers. Our pulse box was
a Smith Root 9.0 GPP (Generator Powered Pulsator, Smith Root International,
Vancouver, WA) that was set to maximum output at 680v, with 120 pulses per
second at 20 amps. The sampling crew consisted of a driver, a spotter, and 2 netters.
Our electroshocking effort varied with location and depended on the size of
the area we deemed as suitable Southern Flounder habitat. We used a standard
otter-trawl with a 4.88 m (16’) headrope, 3.81 cm (1.5”) stretch-bar body, 1.9 cm
(0.75”) stretch-bar cod-end, 0.63 cm (0.25”) cod-end liner, and a 22.86 m (75’)
rope bridle; tow speeds were 1–3 knots. We conducted nine 5-minute trawls and
Figure 1. Map of fyke-net sampling-stations along the Mattaponi River in southeastern
Virginia.
Southeastern Naturalist
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
518
one 10-minute trawl on 11 June 2012, and ten 5-minute trawls on 18 June 2012
(total = 20 trawls).
Specimen processing
We counted the total number of gill rakers on the first arch of all individuals and
identified fish with 10–14 gill rakers as Southern Flounder; the sympatric species
Paralichthys dentatus L. (Summer Flounder) has 16–24 gill rakers on the first arch
(Murdy et al. 1997), a diference that allowed us to make positive identifications. We
recorded total length (TL; mm) and weight (g) of all Southern Flounder specimens
and removed sagittal otoliths for age estimation; a tissue sample was removed and
stored in 95% ethanol for genetic analysis. We preserved all specimens in formalin
and stored them in the VIMS ichthyology collection. Multiple people collected,
prepared, and read otoliths. However, we found that daily age estimates derived
from these reads were not reliable due to lack of clarity; therefore, age data are not
reported here.
Genetic analysis
We analyzed tissue from 6 of the individuals collected in the Mattaponi River
for a genetic identification; we included an adult specimen collected in Back Bay,
VA (VIMS 13589) in our analysis. DNA was extracted using a QIAGEN DNeasy kit
(QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. We amplified
cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) using PCR on a BIORAD S1000 thermal
cycler (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA). PCR reactions (25 μl) were completed using 13.3
μl water, 5 μl of 5x PCR Buffer, 3 mM MgCl, 0.5 μl of 200-μM dNTPs, 1 μl each of
the COI primers HCOI 5' TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA 3', and LCOI
5' GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTG 3' (Folmer et al. 1994) for a concentration
of 0.4 μM , 1 unit Taq polymerase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), and
1 μl DNA. We used the following temperature cycle: initial denaturing at 94 °C for
4 minutes followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 minute, annealing
at 45 °C for 1 minute, and extending at 72 °C for 1 minute; final extension was at
72 °C for 10 minutes. We screened PCR products for successful amplification on a
1% agarose gel, excised the COI amplicon, and purified it using the QIAGEN gelextraction
protocol. Sequencing reactions used ABI’s BigDye (Life Technologies,
Carlsbad, CA) chemistry and were completed by denaturing at 96 °C for 1 minute
followed by 25 cycles of 96 °C for 1 minute, 50 °C for 1 second, and 60 °C for 5
seconds. DNA was precipitated using ethanol/sodium acetate following the manufacturer’s
protocol. We ran out sequences on an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and used Sequencher V.4.10.1 (Gene Codes Corporation,
Ann Arbor, MI) to visualize chromatograms, create contigs, edit the forward
and reverse sequences. We compared sequences to most closely related sequences
using a BLAST search of GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/genbank).
Results
During 16 June–28 August 2012, we collected 21,923 individual fishes (51
species) in fyke nets. The average water temperature for the period was 27.5 °C
Southeastern Naturalist
519
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
(Table 1). We collected a total of 15 juvenile Southern Flounder from fyke-net
sampling; these individuals weighed 2.56–84.0 g and were 71–192 mm TL (Fig. 2).
We collected Southern Flounder at all 5 stations, with most individuals captured at
station 1 (n = 6). A single Southern Flounder (84.0 g, 190 mm TL) was collected
during electroshocking. Our gill-raker counts confirmed that all specimens collected
were Southern Flounder (Table 2). We were able to obtain usable sequencing
results from 3 of the 6 tissue samples collected from the Mattaponi River for genetic
confirmation. BLAST-search results for those 3 samples matched Southern
Flounder sequences generated by Weigt (2012).
Table 1. Catch data from fyke-net sampling in the Mattaponi River.
Total number collected Water
Date Fishes Species Families Southern Flounder temp. (°C)
5/16/2012 1873 25 14 0 22.15
5/22/2012 1781 26 18 0 21.87
5/30/2012 1671 32 17 3 26.37
6/5/2012 1431 28 13 1 24.20
6/12/2012 1369 31 16 5 25.50
6/19/2012 3291 27 15 2 24.24
6/26/2012 1327 32 16 1 27.82
7/3/2012 1127 26 17 2 29.66
7/10/2012 563 24 15 0 30.91
7/18/2012 1943 36 15 0 30.54
7/24/2012 846 30 17 1 29.77
7/31/2012 1800 30 13 0 30.43
8/7/2012 1731 40 16 0 30.67
8/15/2012 1005 28 16 0 29.11
8/21/2012 556 32 16 0 26.52
Table 2. Data from specimens of Southern Flounder collected in the Mattaponi River.
Gill-raker
Specimen # Date collected Station Gear type TL (mm) Weight (g) count
VIMS 13578a 5/30/2012 4 Fyke net 75 3.54 12
VIMS 13578b 5/30/2012 4 Fyke net 71 2.56 12
VIMS 13579 5/30/2012 1 Fyke net 92 5.84 12
VIMS 13588 6/5/2012 3 Fyke net 81 3.28 10
VIMS 13580a 6/13/2012 1 Fyke net 112 13.92 12
VIMS 13584 6/13/2012 3 Fyke net 118 15.34 11
VIMS 13580b 6/13/2012 1 Fyke net 117 15.84 13
VIMS 13580c 6/13/2012 1 Fyke net 127 19.92 13
VIMS 13580d 6/13/2012 1 Fyke net 129 20.71 13
VIMS 13586 6/19/2012 5 Fyke net 108 11.90 10
VIMS 13583 6/26/2012 2 Fyke net 93 6.94 13
VIMS 13581 7/3/2012 1 Fyke net 157 36.14 12
VIMS 13587 7/3/2012 5 Fyke net 149 30.86 12
VIMS 13582 7/12/2012 Near 1 Electroshocking 190 84.00 12
VIMS 13585 7/24/2012 3 Fyke net 192 71.30 11
Southeastern Naturalist
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
520
Discussion
Morphological and genetic analyses confirmed that Southern Flounder were
present in the Mattaponi River in the summer of 2012. Wenner et al. (1990) found
that male and female Southern Flounder reach maturity at 230 mm and 320 mm, respectively.
All individuals collected in the present study were significantly smaller
than 230 mm; therefore, we identified them as juveniles. The Mattaponi River is
~200 miles north of the northernmost reported spawning population of Southern
Flounder (Blandon et al. 2001, Enge and Mulholland 1985, Gilbert 1986). Although
adult individuals are known to enter the lower Chesapeake Bay in late summer and
fall (Murdy et al. 1997; B. Greenlee, pers. comm.), the occurrence of juveniles has
not been recorded. It is possible that the presence of juvenile Southern Flounder
in the Mattaponi River is a rare event; there may have been a slight alteration of
offshore ocean currents that carried larvae up the Atlantic coast and deposited them
in the lower Chesapeake Bay. These larvae ingressed into the Mattaponi River
in early spring, likely as a result of the North Carolina population of Southern
Figure 2. Juvenile Paralichthys lethostigma (Southern Flounder) from the Mattaponi
River. A) VIMS 13579, caught 30 May 2012 (92 mm TL; fixed in formalin prior to photo).
B) VIMS 13585, caught 24 July 2012 (192 mm TL). Scale bars equal 20 mm.
Southeastern Naturalist
521
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
Flounder spawning farther north than they have historically, perhaps due to warming
coastal temperatures. Cheung et al. (2013) recently suggested that there is a
strong correlation between rising ocean temperature and an increase in the presence
of warm-water fishes in higher latitudes. An additional study looking at the correlation
between Chesapeake Bay winter water temperatures and the survival rate of
juvenile Southern Flounder in the bay would be invaluable in determining how this
species responds to changing ecological environments.
Gibson (1994) found that temperature, and to a lesser extent salinity, is the
most important abiotic factor for optimal survival of juvenile flatfishes. Daniels
et al. (1996) found that pre-metamorphosis, Southern Flounder suffered 100%
mortality when exposed to salinities of 0 parts per thousand (ppt). Daily salinity
recorded at all stations sampled was less than 1 ppt. Therefore, the individuals
collected in our sampling likely metamorphosed prior to entering the freshwater
reaches of the Mattaponi River, probably in either the main stem Chesapeake Bay
or in the lower York River system. This pattern of migration from saline to fresh
waters, including substantial use of freshwater habitats, was described by Lowe
et al. (2011), who reported that juvenile Southern Flounder select freshwater
habitats (typically estuaries) based on biological, chemical, and physical characteristics.
Additionally, they suggest that juvenile Southern Flounder use these
freshwater habitats as a nursery area before they mature and migrate back to the
continental shelf to spawn.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ryan Norris for assistance in the field, and Katie May Laumann for assistance
with the sequence data. We are grateful to Tom Wadsworth (North Carolina
Department of Marine Fisheries, Moorehead City, NC) and VDGIF staff Chad Boyce,
Bob Greenlee and Scott Hermann for providing data and for assistance in the field, and
to Rob Latour (VIMS) for discussion. This study was conducted as part of a research
experience for undergraduates at VIMS (NSF 0552612), and we thank the principal investigators
and others involved in this program, including Linda Schaffner, Rochelle
Seitz, Jennifer Dreyer, and Gina Ralph. Funding for the fyke-net survey was provided
through the Virginia Marine Resources Commission and US Fish and Wildlife Service
(F-116-R-15). This is contribution 3296 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College
of William & Mary.
Literature Cited
Blandon, I.R., T.L. King, W.J. Karel, and J.P. Monaghan, Jr. 2001. Preliminary genetic
population structure of Southern Flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, along the Atlantic
Coast and Gulf of Mexico. US National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin
99:671–678.
Cheung, W.W.L., R. Watson, and D. Pauly. 2013. Signature of ocean warming in global
fisheries catch. Nature 497:365–368.
Daniels, H.V. 2000. Species profile: Southern Flounder, Southern Regional Aquaculture
Center. Available online at http://www.ca.uky.edu/wkrec/southernflounder.pdf. Accessed
13 June 2012.
Southeastern Naturalist
S.C. Lusk, B.E. Watkins, A. Rhea, C.B. Dillman, and E.J. Hilton
2014 Vol. 13, No. 3
522
Daniels, H.V, D.L. Berlinsky, R.G. Hodson, and C.V. Sullivan. 1996. Effects of stocking
density, salinity, and light intensity on growth and survival of Southern Flounder, Paralichthys
lethostigma, larvae. Journal World Aquaculture Society 27:153–159.
Enge, K.M., and R. Mulholland. 1985. Habitat-suitability index models: Southern and Gulf
Flounders. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82. Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC. 25 pp.
Fischer, A.J., and B.A. Thompson. 2004. The age and growth of Southern Flounder, Paralichthys
lethostigma, from Louisiana estuarine and offshore waters. Bulletin of Marine
Science 75:63–77.
Gibson, R.N. 1994. Impact of habitat quality and quantity on the recruitment of juvenile
flatfishes. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 32:191–206.
Gi1bert, C.R. 1986. Species profiles: Life histories and environmental requirements of
coastal fishes and invertebrates (South Florida): Southern, Gulf, and Summer Flounders.
US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82. Department of the Interior, Washington,
DC. 14 pp.
Guindon, K.Y., and J.M. Miller. 1995. Growth potential of juvenile Southern Flounder,
Paralichthys lethostigma, in low-salinity nursery areas of Pamlico Sound, North Carolina
USA. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 34:89–100.
Lowe, M.R., D.R. DeVries, R.A. Wright, S.A. Ludsin, and B.J. Fryer. 2011. Otolith microchemistry
reveals substantial use of freshwater by Southern Flounder in the northern
Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts 34:630–639.
McEachran, J.D., and J. D. Fechhelm. 2005. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Volume 2. University
of Texas Press, Austin, TX. 1004 pp.
Murdy E.O., and J.A. Musick. 2013. Field Guide to Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Johns Hopkins
University Press, Baltimore, MD. 346 pp.
Murdy, E.O., R.S. Birdsong, and J A. Musick. 1997. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington DC. 324 pp.
Priest, W.I., G.M. Silberhorn, and A.W. Zacherle. 1987. King and Queen County tidal marsh
inventory. Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Special Report No. 291.
Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA. 43 pp.
Stokes, G.M. 1977. Life-history studies of Southern Flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma)
and Gulf Flounder (P. albigutta) in the Aransas Bay areas of Texas. Texas Parks and
Wildlife Departmental Technical Series 25:1–37.
Van Maaren, C.C., and H.V. Daniels. 2008. A practical guide to the morphological development
of Southern Flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, from hatch through metamorphosis.
Journal of Applied Aquaculture 10:1–9.
Wenner, C.A., W.A. Roumillat, J.R. Moran, Jr., M.B. Maddox, L.B. Daniel III, and J.W.
Smith. 1990. Investigations on the life history and population dynamics of marine recreational
fishes in South Carolina: Part 1. Marine Resources Research Institute. SC DNR,
F–37 35. Charleston, SC.
Weigt, L.A., C. Baldwin, A.C. Driskell, D.G. Smith, A. Ormos, and E.A Reyier. 2012. Using
DNA barcoding to assess Caribbean reef-fish biodiversity: Expanding taxonomic and
geographic coverage. PLoS One 7:e41059.