Long-term Impacts of Controlled Burns on the Ant
Community (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of a Sandplain
Forest in Vermont
Valerie S. Banschbach and Emily Ogilvy
Northeastern Naturalist, Volume 21, Issue 1 (2014): NENHC-1—NENHC-12
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)
Access Journal Content
Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.
Current Issue: Vol. 30 (3)
Check out NENA's latest Monograph:
Monograph 22
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-1
2014 NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST 21(1):NENHC-1–NENHC-12
Long-term Impacts of Controlled Burns on the Ant
Community (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of a Sandplain
Forest in Vermont
Valerie S. Banschbach1,* and Emily Ogilvy1
Abstract - Sandplain Pine-Oak-Heath forest is one of Vermont’s most threatened natural
communities due to fire suppression and land development. We studied the ant community
in the largest remaining tract of sandplain forest in the state of Vermont, at the Camp
Johnson Army National Guard Base, in Colchester. We investigated the long-term impacts
of controlled burns conducted in 1995 and 1998 by examining ant specimens collected in
burned and control (unburned) areas during September and early October of 2006, 2007,
and 2008. The 1750 ant specimens from 911 pitfall traps yielded 29 ant species. Although
sample effort was un-even, there was a greater than two-fold difference in species richness
between the sites: 28 species in the burned site and 13 species in the control site. Ant abundance
was significantly greater at the burned site compared to the control, and the Shannon
index of species diversity differed as well. Canopy cover was significantly different in the
burned site compared to the control site. Increased habitat diversity and increased forestfloor
temperature following from the more open canopy in the burned area could potentially
account for the greater abundance, species richness, and diversity of ants in the burned area.
The striking differences in the ant communities of the burned versus the control areas 8–10
years post-burn demonstrate the potential usefulness of monitoring ants as indicators of the
long-term ecological change induced by burning of the sandplain forest.
Introduction
One of Vermont’s most threatened plant communities is sandplain or Pine-Oak-
Heath Forest (Nongame and Natural Heritage Program Newsletter 2006). Sandplain
forest is a fire-adapted community belonging to the more general category of
pine barrens found across the Northeastern US, but lacking the completely open areas
or stunted trees characterizing true pine barrens (Engstrom 1991). Historically,
Chittenden County, in northwestern Vermont, contained nearly 6100 ha of sandplain
forest. Today, only 265 ha remain. Engstrom (1991) concluded that although
the sandplain forest in Vermont contains a low plant species diversity, it features a
disproportionate number of rare plants at the upper limit of their geographic range.
Some 27 rare plant species are found in sandplain forest. Most of these are shadeintolerant
species, and their presence is facilitated by the open nature of the sandplain
forest canopy (Engstrom 1991). Therefore, sandplain forest is an important
habitat to conserve.
Fire suppression presents a key threat to sandplain forest viability. Fire suppression
in pine barrens communities of the Northeast has been shown to lead
1Saint Michael’s College, Colchester, VT 05439. *Corresponding author - vbanschbach@
smcvt.edu.
Manuscript Editor: Christopher M. Heckscher
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-2
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
to decreased barrens size and decreased plant species diversity as the community
shifts toward hardwood forest (Milne 1985). In the sandplain forests of Vermont,
Acer rubrum L. (Red Maple) in particular becomes increasingly abundant over
time as a result of fire suppression. The forest canopy also becomes more closed,
shading out heath shrubs and Pinus rigida Mill. (Pitch Pine) seedlings that are
characteristic of the sandplain forest. To understand the impacts of fire, vegetation
can be monitored directly to assess its return to the native forest type, but it would
be useful to identify other indicators of the ecological change occurring during
post-burn forest succession.
Our study focused on how the ant community in the sandplain forest was affected
by a controlled burn, 8–10 years post-burn. Few studies have assessed the impact of
vegetation change on ant communities (Ellison et al. 2007) and, more specifically,
little is known about the impacts of controlled burns on ant communities (Hoffman
2008). Studies of the impacts of fire on arthropods have focused more often upon
tropical savannas or temperate grasslands (e.g., Anderson et al. 1989, Parr et al.
2004, reviewed in Swengel 2001) rather than temperate forests.
We engaged undergraduate students in the laboratory portion of our Introduction
to Ecology and Evolution course at Saint Michael’s College, Colchester, VT,
in censusing the invertebrates and plants on the largest remaining parcel of sandplain
forest in the state, 162 ha, at the Vermont Army National Guard Base, Camp
Johnson, in Colchester, VT (Nongame and Natural Heritage Newsletter 2006).
Although the students collected a wealth of data, we chose to focus solely on the
ants, given the key roles they play in ecosystems—as nutrient-cyclers, bioturbators,
prey, mutualists, etc.—that make them a strong potential bioindicator group
(Majer et al. 2007).
Ants may be a logical choice as a biological indicator group, but more data
are needed to support this hypothesis for cold temperate biomes (Ellison 2012).
Here, we focused on ants as indicators of ecological change brought about by the
controlled sandplain burns. Our objectives were two-fold: (1) to determine if some
characteristics of the ant community differ between burned areas and unburned
areas, 8 to 10 years post-burn, and (2) to relate features of the ant community
to characteristics of the tree and shrub communities, burned and unburned. We
predicted that a more open canopy, resulting from the post-burn succession, and
consequent increased vegetation diversity, would lead to more niches for ants and
increased ant species diversity.
Methods
Study site
Our field site was the 162 ha of sandplain forest at the Camp Johnson Vermont
Army National Guard Base in Colchester, Chittenden County, VT (hereafter, Camp
Johnson; elevation: 91–97.5 m.a.s.l.; 44.51°N, 73.16°W). Sandplain forest occurs
on soils that are sandy, well drained, acidic, and nutrient poor. Camp Johnson’s
sandy soils are the result of its location on the Winooski River Delta and from recent
glaciation of Vermont. The characteristic tree species of sandplain forest are
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-3
Pitch Pine, Pinus strobus L. (White Pine), Quercus velutina Lam. (Black Oak), and
Quercus rubra L. (Red Oak). Red Maple is quite common and becoming increasingly
dominant in areas of Camp Johnson that have not been burned in a long time.
Heath shrubs thriving in the acidic soil are Vaccinium angustifolium Ait. (Lowbush
Blueberry), Vaccinium pallidum Ait. (Blue Ridge Blueberry), Gaylussacia baccata
(Wangenh.) K. Koch (Black Huckleberry), and Kalmia angustifolia L. (Sheep Laurel)
(Engstrom 1991). In some areas of the forest, the larger shrubs Corylus cornuta
Marshall (Beaked Hazelnut) and Hamamelis virginiana L. (Witch Hazel) are common,
forming a high shrub layer (Engstrom 1991).
In order to manage this threatened ecosystem, two controlled burns affecting
6 ha were carried out in the 1990s by the Vermont Army National Guard and collaborating
community partners (Fig. 1; Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department and
The Nature Conservancy; Nongame and Natural Heritage Newsletter 2006). After
the first burn of 3.25 ha (“hot burn” area in Fig. 1) in 1995, Pitch Pine seeds from
the Camp Johnson Pitch Pine population were germinated. Those seedlings were
Figure 1. Location of Camp Johnson (Vermont Army National Guard Base, Colchester,
VT) study areas (2004 image). The “hot burn” area was burned for the first time in 1995
and burned again in 1998. The “cool burn” area was burned once in 1998. Fine lines depict
trails utilized by the National Guard for training exercises. Orthophoto courtesy of Brett
Engstrom.
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-4
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
then planted and protected from the second burn, which was conducted in 1998. In
1998, 3.25 ha that were burned previously and 2.6 additional ha (“cool burn” area
in Fig. 1) were burned. In total, 400 Pitch Pine seedlings were planted between
1995 and 1999 in the burned area. To foster the growth of the Pitch Pine seedlings,
competing vegetation was cut between 1995 and the 1998 burn and again in 1999
(Nongame and Natural Heritage Newsletter 2006).
Data collection
We worked with vegetation data and ant specimens collected by undergraduate
students supervised by Saint Michael’s College faculty at the study site in 2006,
2007, and 2008. Vegetation data were collected along sixty-three 20-m transects.
Along each transect, the students identified trees and shrubs to species, measured
shrub and canopy coverage (densiometer readings), and recorded diameter at breast
height of trees in order to calculate importance values for trees. To sample ants, students
placed pitfall traps in the control forest (habitat unburned in recent times) and
both burned areas (Fig. 1). The pitfall traps were 50-ml centrifuge tubes, half-filled
with Sierra brand antifreeze (propylene glycol) diluted to 50% by adding an equal
volume of tap water. Students were given freedom as to where to place traps and
how many traps to utilize, resulting in an uneven sampling effort across the control
and burned areas. We were careful to account for this uneven sampling effort in our
statistical treatment of data by adjusting ant abundance at each site for trapping effort
and by using rarefaction analysis with curves generated only up to the number
of individuals in the smaller sample. Students placed traps with the openings flush
with the surface of the soil by digging in with a soil corer and collected them after
two weeks. All trapping occurred between mid-September and the first week of
October of each year. Students sorted ants from other collected macroinvertebrates
and preserved them in 95% ethanol.
We curated the ants and conducted statistical analyses to examine trends in abundance
and diversity. We made a point-mounted voucher collection from the pitfall trap
ants and identified ant specimens using keys (Coovert, 2005, Ellison et al. 2012, and
Fisher and Cover 2007), photographs on Antweb.org, and to a reference collection
made by V.S. Banschbach for an oak-hardwood forest in Jericho, VT (Banschbach
et al. 2012). Identities of vouchers in the oak-hardwood reference collection were
confirmed by Stefan Cover, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University.
Voucher specimens are housed in the insect collection of the Biology Department at
Saint Michael’s College, Colchester, VT. Frequency (number of ants of a given species
per total number of traps), and relative abundance (number of ants of a given
species per total ants) were tabulated for ants from the control area and the burned
areas pooled (“hot burn” and “cool burn” areas). We performed rarefaction analysis to
estimate species richness using the EstimateS software version 9.0, Colwell (2013).
We used the Chao 1 metric to estimate species richness for the control versus burned
areas (Gotelli et al. 2011). Rarefaction curves were generated using EstimateS software
(Colwell 2013). For the species richness rarefaction and estimation, we used
individual-based procedures because the data were not cataloged by each pitfall trap.
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-5
Our dataset included all ant specimens collected by the classes in 2006, 2007, and
2008, and a record of collection location, date, and number of traps used, but we did
not have a record of ant occurrences in each individual trap utilized. The Wilcoxon
Rank Sums and chi quare goodness-of-fit tests were used to compare measures across
control and burned areas.
Results
The ant community samples from 911 pitfall traps yielded 1750 ants from 29
species, 14 genera, and 5 subfamilies. The collections made at the two sites differed
significantly in ant abundance, diversity, and species richness (Table 1). Across
all species, significantly more ants were captured per trap at the burned site than
at the control site (Table 1). More than twice as many ant species were collected in
the burned site compared to the control site (Table 1). The Shannon index for the
burned site was also higher than for the control site (Table 1). Of the 29 species collected
in total, 16 were only collected in the burned area, and just one species was
unique to the control area. The Morisita-Horn index of overlap for the two sites’ ant
species composition was 0.898; overlap was high—the burned site contained all but
one of the species found in the control site.
In contrast with the ant-community data, plant-community measures showed
less differentiation between the burned and control sites. Eighteen tree species and
nine shrub species were found on transects covering 3800 m (trees) and 2500 m
(shrubs) in the burned and control areas. Of the 18 tree species sampled, four were
found only in the burned site and two solely in the control site. For the nine shrub
species, three were found only in the burned site and none solely in the control site.
Shrub coverage did not differ between the burned and control areas (Table 1), but
canopy coverage differed significantly, with a 20% more open canopy in the burned
Table 1. Summary of sampling effort, ants collected, and vegetation characteristics of the burned and
unburned sandplain forest sites at the Camp Johnson (Vermont Army National Guard Base, Colchester,
VT). Transects used for vegetation sampling were 100 m in length. An asterisk represents statistically
significant differences between sites at P < 0.05.
Burned site Control site Statistic (P-value)
Ants
Number of pitfall traps 628 283
Number collected 1585 165
Number per trap 2.52 0.583 W = 628 (0.0004)*
Number of species 28 13 χ2 = 5.49, df =1 (0.019)*
Shannon diversity index 1.98 1.51
Trees
Number of transects 26 12
Number of species 16 14 χ2 = 0.133, df =1 (0.715)
Percent canopy cover 57.60 77.60 W = 336 (0.0013)*
Shrubs
Number of transects 16 9
Number of species 9 6 χ2 = 0.600, df =1 (0.439)
Percent coverage 21.14 21.88 W = 115 (0.9323)
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-6
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
area versus the control area (Table 1). Across the data for all transects, five tree species
in the burned area had importance values (IV) greater than 30 on a 300-point
scale: Black Oak, Red Maple, White Pine, White Oak, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.
(American Beech), and Pitch Pine. For the control site, four tree species registered
IV greater than 30: Red Maple, White Pine, White Oak, and Black Oak.
The ant communities at the burned and control sites differed in terms of species
composition and abundance. Of the 29 ant species collected, Aphaenogaster
rudis (likely a species complex; Umphrey 1996) and Myrmica punctiventris were
common at both sites (relative abundance; Table 2). At the burned site, however,
Camponotus pennsylvanicus and M. detritinodis were also common species, each
representing at least 10% of the ants collected (Table 2). In contrast, at the control
site, Aphaenogaster rudis and M. punctiventris represented 52% and 24%, respectively,
of the ants collected (Table 2), with no other species commonly occurring in
our samples.
Table 2. Ant species frequency (ants per trap) and relative abundance (ants per total ants) in the burned
and unburned sandplain forested sites at the Camp Johnson (Vermont Army National Guard Base,
Colchester, VT).
Burned site Control site
Ant species Ants/trap Ants/total ants Ants/trap Ants/total ants
Aphaenogaster rudis Enzmann 0.873 0.346 0.304 0.521
Camponotus herculeanus L. 0.003 0.001 0.000 0.000
Camponotus pennsylvanicus De Geer 0.244 0.097 0.000 0.000
Formica exsectoides Forel 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.000
Formica lasioides Emery 0.006 0.003 0.000 0.000
Formica neogagates Viereck 0.008 0.003 0.000 0.000
Formica neorufibarbis Emery 0.013 0.005 0.000 0.000
Formica subintegra Wheeler 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.000
Formica subsericea Say 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000
Formica sp. 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.006
Lasius sp. 0.018 0.007 0.007 0.012
Lasius alienus Forster 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.000
Lasius flavus Fabricius 0.003 0.001 0.004 0.006
Lasius nearcticus Wheeler 0.006 0.003 0.000 0.000
Lasius neoniger Emery 0.013 0.005 0.000 0.000
Lasius umbratus Nylander 0.006 0.003 0.004 0.006
Myrmecina americana Emery 0.024 0.009 0.028 0.048
Myrmica detritinodis Emery 0.365 0.144 0.028 0.048
Myrmica fracticornis Forel 0.186 0.074 0.021 0.036
Myrmica punctiventris Roger 0.540 0.214 0.141 0.242
Ponera pennsylvanica Buckley 0.008 0.003 0.004 0.006
Prenolepis imparis Say 0.078 0.031 0.007 0.012
Protomognathus americanus Emery 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000
Solenopsis molesta Say 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000
Stenamma diecki Emery 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.000
Stenamma schmitti Wheeler 0.035 0.014 0.028 0.048
Stigmatomma pallipes Haldeman 0.008 0.003 0.000 0.000
Tapinoma sessile Say 0.032 0.013 0.004 0.006
Temnothorax longispinosus Roger 0.030 0.012 0.000 0.000
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-7
Both observed and estimated species richness were higher in the burned area
than the control site (Fig. 2). Estimated total species richness based on pooled
pitfall data for each site (considering the total collection of ants from each site
as a single sample) was calculated using the Chao 1 estimator for the aggregate
samples. For the control site, the estimated total species richness was 16.33 spp.
with 95% C.I. = 13.5–35.07 (n = 165). For the burned site, the estimated total species
richness was 31 spp. with 95% C.I. = 29.25–45.01 (n = 1585).
Figure 2. Results from pitfall trapping for ants at two sandplain forest sites at Camp Johnson
(Vermont Army National Guard Base, Colchester, VT): (A) Number of species observed, with
standard deviation for the burned site; and (B) estimation of species richness-based incidence
records using the Chao 1 estimator, with standard deviationfor the burned site (see text).
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-8
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
Discussion
We predicted that the burned sandplain forest would support a more diverse
ant community than the unburned sandplain forest because of increased habitat
diversity due to post-burn succession. Our results show a clear difference between
the ant communities in the burned and unburned areas, 8 to10 years post-burn; the
burned area contains a significantly greater abundance, greater species richness,
and greater species diversity of ants. While we did not have pre-burn ant community
data from the burned forest, the very close proximity of the burned and
unburned areas, and their similarity in other ecological respects, makes it likely that
our results reflect effects of the burn on the ant community. Previous studies have
documented a short-term impact (less than a few months post-burn) of fire on ant
communities (Bess et al. 2002) and a medium-term effect (a few months to one year
post-burn) of fire on abundance of certain ant species (Underwood and Christian
2009, Underwood and Quinn 2010), or found no impacts of fire on abundance and
richness of ants (Houdeshell et al. 2011, Parr et al. 2004, Vasconcelos et al. 2008).
Therefore, our results are novel in that they are consistent with a long-term effect
of fire on the ant community.
We expected that the effect of fire on the ant community would occur due to
increased habitat diversity created by differences in tree and shrub species composition,
vegetation profile, and microclimate. In support, we found a strong difference
in canopy cover between the two sites, with the burned area featuring a more open
canopy by twenty percent. The key difference in tree species IV between the sites
was the increased prevalence of Pitch Pine (reintroduced) and American Beech at
the burned site. The shrub coverage was similar at the two sites, with species at the
control site consisting of a smaller subset of the species at the burned site. Consistent
with the ant-community species-composition patterns, some additional shrub
species (3 spp.) were found in the burned area that were absent from the control
area, likely due to the more open canopy resulting from the burn. An open canopy
featuring Pitch Pine as a common tree species is characteristic of sandplain forest,
speaking to the efficacy of the burns and Pitch Pine seedling reintroduction as components
of the management plan for sandplain forest restoration (Engstrom 1991).
At our sandplain forest study site, one impact of the more open canopy is a warmer
forest floor (V.S. Banschbach, unpubl. data; Banschbach et al. 2012), perhaps
benefitting growth and survival of ant colonies and leading to increased abundance
of ants in the burned area samples.
A slight difference in microclimate can lead to ant-nest temperature differences
that may have a dramatic influence on colony demography, reproduction, behavior,
and survival of workers (e.g., Banschbach et al. 1997, Oldroyd 2009, Porter 1988).
This effect would be especially noticeable in September and early October when
northern temperate-forest ant species are preparing for and entering into winter dormancy
either by moving underground or entering dormancy inside of pre-formed
cavities of sticks and acorns in the leaf litter. Impacts from increased wind penetration
due to decreased tree canopy coverage would likely be negated by the lack of
shrub cover difference between the two sites. The timing of the sampling in the late
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-9
summer and early fall allowed us to capture a marked difference in ant abundance
between these sites that suggests the burned habitat allows ant colonies to achieve
a longer growing season.
The species composition of the ant communities in the burned and control
areas overlapped substantially, supporting the idea that the burned area contains
not only the same ants found in the unburned forest in greater abundance,
but an additional set of species that were able to thrive in the burned area into
the late summer and early fall. The most common ant species at both sites was
Aphaenogaster rudis, comprising 35% of the catch in the burned site and 52% in
the control site. Aphaenogaster rudis ants are behaviorally subordinate to Camponotus
spp. and Formica spp. (Stuble et al. 2012), but A. rudis is quick to discover
baits and employs tool use at liquid or semi-solid food resources in order
to avoid physical confrontation with other ant species (Banschbach et al. 2006).
Some of A. rudis’s dominating competitors were found in the burned area (e.g.,
Camponotus spp. and Formica spp.) but were not taken in traps in the control
site, perhaps due to decreased temperature of the forest floor at the control site,
similar to the findings of Lessard et al. (2009). In contrast to A. rudis, M. punctiventris
had a similar relative abundance in both our control and burned areas. In
the month of September when the pitfall trapping was conducted, the minimum
average air temperature was 10.5 °C, and the maximum average air temperature
was 20.8 °C (mean from 1981–2010; National Weather Service 2013). Lessard et
al. (2009) found that M. punctiventris had the greatest foraging temperature range
and commonly foraged at a much lower temperature (15 ºC) than the six common
ant species in a southern Appalachian high-elevation ant community. Myrmica
punctiventris may thrive in both burned and control areas because it is tolerant of
a wider range of temperatures than other species.
The burned area is in a post-fire successional stage featuring a more open canopy
and increased richness of shrub species as well as, putatively, an increased
number of niches for ants. Del Toro et al. (2013) found that early successional,
open habitats in Massachusetts were critical to increasing ant biodiversity in
White Pine forests, due to the impacts of the cool temperatures of the forest floor
in mature forests reducing abundance of some species. Furthermore, pine barrens,
with their open canopies, had a greater species richness than White Pine
forests (Del Toro et al. 2013). Our results provide additional evidence that a more
open canopy leads to increased ant species richness. In rarefaction analysis, species
richness was higher for the burned site than for the control area even when
examining values up to just 160 individuals sampled. The estimated species
richness of 31 ant species (Chao 1 estimator based upon data for all 1585 ants
sampled) in the burned area is comparable to other findings for similar habitat
types in New England (e.g., Chao 2 richness estimate of approximately 30 ant
spp. in pine barrens of Massachusetts [Del Toro et al. 2013]; 15 to 35 spp. collected
for sandplain heathland and Pitch Pine heathland habitats on the island
of Nantucket, MA [Ellison 2011]). If the controlled burn is the cause for the increased
species richness of the ant community by enhancing the capacity for ants
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-10
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
to fill the many niches they occupy in forest ecosystems, this result speaks to the
efficacy of sandplain forest restoration via controlled burning and planting of
Pitch Pine seedlings.
Our ongoing work at the Camp Johnson field site includes late spring/early summer
and late summer/early fall study of a more recent controlled burn conducted in
May 2013 in a previously unburned area of the forest. The addition of late spring/
early summer data collection utilizing a range of standard techniques (pitfall trapping,
baits, and Winkler samping) will allow us to determine how much of the
increased species richness may be accounted for by season. Phenology of the ant
community in relation to burned and unburned areas needs to be better understood.
If the differences in the ant community are not as strong in the Summer, this result
would suggest that our current findings relate to the fact that in September, in the
cooler control area, many species have begun to enter dormancy. By tracking the
results of the 2013 burn, compared to control (unburned) areas at the Camp Johnson
site, we will be able to detect the temporal changes for the ants and the plants. Furthermore,
we will be able to compare replicate samples , rather than individuals, in
our summer datasets, avoiding a statistical limitation of our current dataset (Gotelli
et al. 2011). Taken on their own, the data reported here support the idea that high ant
species richness serves as an indicator of ecological change in the case of sandplain
forest restoration via controlled burning.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Vermont Army National Guard officers and civilian staff at Camp
Johnson for allowing the Saint Michael’s College Biology Department faculty and students
to study the sandplain forest management area. In particular, Mike O’Hara, Vermont
Military Lands Administrator, and Major Jacob Roy, Environmental Protection Supervisor,
have provided invaluable support. Brett Engstrom, Nature Conservancy of Vermont, has
also provided useful data and expertise based on his long-term study of the natural communities
of Vermont. Emily Ogilvy was funded by a Vice President for Academic Affairs
(Saint Michael’s College) Summer Student Research Grant and a VPAA travel grant. We
are also grateful to the Biology Department faculty who teach the Introduction to Ecology
and Evolution course for their expert guidance of the students who have collected data on
the sandplain forest for the past 7 years at Saint Michael’s College.
Literature Cited
Anderson, R.C., T. Leahy, and S.S. Dhillion. 1989. Numbers and biomass of selected insect
groups on burned and unburned sand prairie. American Midland Naturalist 122:151–162.
Banschbach, V.S., N. Levit, and J.M. Herbers. 1997. Nest temperatures and thermal preferences
of a forest ant species: Is polydomy a thermoregulatory mechanism? Insectes
Sociaux 44:109–122.
Banschbach, V.S., A. Brunelle, K.M. Bartlett, J.Y. Grivetti, and R.L. Yeamans. 2006. Tool
use by the forest ant Aphaenogaster rudis: Ecology and task allocation. Insectes Sociaux
53:463–471.
Banschbach, V.S., R.L. Yeamans, A. Brunelle, A. Gulka, and M. Holmes. 2012. Edge effects
on community and social structure of Northern temperate deciduous forest ants. Psyche
2012:Article ID 548260, 7 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/548260. Available online at http://
www.hindawi.com/journals/psyche/2012/548260/.
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014
NENHC-11
Bess, E.C., R.R. Parmenter, S. McCoy, and M.G. Molles, Jr. 2002. Responses of a riparian
forest-floor ant community to wildfire in the Middle Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico.
Environmental Entomology 31:774–784.
Colwell, R.K. 2013. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species
from samples. Version 9. User’s guide and application. Available online at http://purl.
oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 20 June 2013.
Coovert, G.A. 2005. The Ants of Ohio (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ohio Biological Survey
Bulletin New Series Vol. 15(2). Ohio Biological Survey, Inc. Columbus, OH. 196 pp.
Del Toro, I., K. Towle, D.N. Morrison, and S.L. Pelini. 2013. Community structure and
ecological and behavioral traits of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Massachusetts
open and forested habitats. Northeastern Naturalist 20:103–114.
Ellison, A.M. 2011. The Ants of Nantucket: Unexpectedly high biodiversity in an anthropogenic
landscape. Northeastern Naturalist 19(Special Issue 6):43–66.
Ellison, A.M. 2012. Out of Oz: Opportunities and challenges for using ants (Hymenoptera:
Formicidai) as biological indicators in north-temperate cold biomes. Myrmecological
News 17:105–119.
Ellison, A.M., N.J. Gotelli, E.J. Farnsworth, and G.D. Alpert. 2012. A Field Guide to the
Ants of New England. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. 350 pp.
Ellison, A.M., S. Record, A. Arguello, and N.J. Gotelli. 2007. Rapid inventory of the ant
assemblage in a temperate hardwood forest: Species composition and assessment of
sampling methods. Environmental Entomology 36:766–775.
Engstrom, B. 1991. Sandplain natural communities of Chittenden County, Vermont. A report
to the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, Montpelier, VT.
Fisher, B.L., and S.P. Cover. 2007. Ants of North America: A Guide to the Genera. University
of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 194 pp.
Gotelli, N.J., A.M. Ellison, R.R. Dunn, and N.J. Sanders. 2011. Counting ants (Hymenoptera:
Formicidae): Biodiversity sampling and statistical analysis for myrmecologists.
Myrmecological News 15:13–19.
Hoffman, B.D. 2008. Responses of ant communities to experimental fire regimes on
rangelands in the Victoria River District of the Northern Territory. Austral Ecology
28:182–195.
Houdeshell, H., R.L. Friedrich, and S.M. Philpott. 2011. Effects of prescribed burning on
ant nesting ecology in oak savannas. American Midland Naturalist 166:98–111.
Lessard, J.P., R.R. Dunn, and N.J. Sanders. 2009. Temperature-mediated coexistence in
temperate-forest ant communities. Insectes Sociaux 56:149–156.
Majer J.D., G. Orabi, and L. Bisevac. 2007. Ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) pass the bioindicator
scorecard. Myrmecological News 10:69–76.
Milne, B.T. 1985. Upland vegetational gradients and post-fire succession in the Albany Pine
Bush, New York. Torrey Botanical Club 112:21–34.
National Weather Service. 2013. Climate data: Burlington, VT. Available online at http://
www.weather.gov/btv/monthly_totals. Accessed June 2013.
Nongame and Natural Heritage Program Newsletter. 2006. Restoring Vermont’s rare sandplain
forests to Chittenden County. Winter issue. Vermont Fish and Wildlife Service,
Agency of Natural Resources , Waterbury, VT.
Oldroyd, B.P. 2009. Social insects: Rearing temperature affects ant thermoregulatory behavior.
Current Biology 19:R1035–R1036.
Parr, C., H. Robertson, H. Biggs, and S. Chown. 2004. Response of African savanna ants
to long-term fire regimes. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:630–642.
Porter, S.D., 1988. Impact of temperature on colony growth and developmental rates of the
ant Solenopsis invicta. Journal of Insect Physiology 34:1127–1133.
Northeastern Naturalist
NENHC-12
V.S. Banschbach and E. Ogilvy
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
Stuble, K., M.A. Rodriguez-Cabal, G.L. McCormick, I. Juric, R.R. Dunn, and N.J. Sanders.
2012. Tradeoffs, competition and coexistence in eastern deciduous forest ant communities.
Oecologia (2012):1–12.
Swengel, A.B. 2001. A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation
managements of open habitats. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:1141–1169.
Umphrey, G.J. 1996. Morphometric discrimination among sibling species in the fulvarudis-
texana complex of the ant genus Aphaenogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
Canadian Journal of Zoology 74(3):528–559.
Underwood, E.C., and C.E. Christian. 2009. Consequences of prescribed fire and grazing on
grassland ant communities. Environmental Entomology 38:325–332.
Underwood, E.C., and J.F. Quinn. 2010. Response of ants and spiders to prescribed fire in
oak woodlands of California. Journal of Insect Conservation 14:359–366.
Vasconcelos, H.L., M.F. Leite, J.M.S. Vilhena, A.P. Lima, and W.E. Magnusson. 2008. Ant
diversity in Amazonian savannas: Relationship with vegetation structure, disturbance by
fire, and dominant ants. Austral Ecology 33:221–231.