Observations on Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus
anguillicaudatus), an Exotic Species in the Hudson River
Valley, New York
Robert E. Schmidt and Alec J. Schmidt
Northeastern Naturalist, Volume 21, Issue 1 (2014): 134–145
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)
Access Journal Content
Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.
Current Issue: Vol. 30 (3)
Check out NENA's latest Monograph:
Monograph 22
Northeastern Naturalist
134
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
22001144 NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST 2V1(o1l). :2113,4 N–1o4. 51
Observations on Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus
anguillicaudatus), an Exotic Species in the Hudson River
Valley, New York
Robert E. Schmidt1,* and Alec J. Schmidt1
Abstract - We collected data on the distribution, sex, size, fecundity, and food habits of a
newly discovered population of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Oriental Weatherfish) in the
Hudson Valley, NY. Oriental Weatherfish were distributed throughout the Dwaar Kill in
Orange and Ulster counties and at least 7 km of the Wallkill River, principally in the soft
substrates of stream margins. Males were smaller than females and apparently had shorter
life spans. Sexual maturity and spawning attributes were evident. Mature males had pronounced
dorsolateral ridges on at least the posterior third of the body, and females exhibited
post-spawning abrasions dorsal and anterior to the vent. Female Oriental Weatherfish are
batch-spawners producing up to 18,000 eggs at one time. Oriental Weatherfish in the Dwaar
Kill consumed a variety of aquatic macroinvertebrates and exhibited generalist feeding habits.
This species does not seem to be af fecting other vertebrates where currently found, but
potential negative interactions with the native Umbra pygmaea (Eastern Mudminnow) merit
attention. Monitoring of the Hudson Valley populations is needed to determine if Oriental
Weatherfish abundance or range changes dramatically, and to determine if their presence is
causing any lasting effects on the ecosystem.
Introduction
Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cantor) (Oriental Weatherfish) is a temperate fish
of the family Cobitidae from eastern Asia. Fuller et al. (1999) recorded this species
from 8 US states, and it is now found in 12 states including New York (USGS
2010). Introductions have resulted from aquaculture escapes or aquaria releases.
Concern has been expressed about this species’ potential to have negative effects on
native fishes and macroinvertebrates because of its broad environmental tolerance,
low vulnerability to predation, flexible diet, and high reproductive potential (Logan
et al. 1996, Page and Laird 1993). A monogenetic trematode has been introduced
into Australia along with this species (Dove and Ernst 1998) but has not spread
from its host.
The number of non-native fishes in the tidal portion of the Hudson River has
increased substantially over the past several decades, some of which are inducing
changes in the estuary (Daniels et al. 2005). For instance, the invasive Ictalurus
punctatus (Rafinesque) (Channel Catfish) is outcompeting the native Ameiurus catus
(L.) (White Catfish), and Aplodinotus grunniens Rafinesque (Freshwater Drum)
is becoming increasingly abundant since Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) (Zebra
Mussel) became established in the estuary (Daniels et al. 2005). Known invasive
1Bard College at Simon’s Rock, 84 Alford Road, Great Barrington, MA 01230. *Corresponding
author - schmidt@simons-rock.edu.
Manuscript Editor: Michael Wagner
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
135
species that appear in a new locality should be monitored because it is difficult to
predict how the species will react in a complex ecosystem.
In New York, an Oriental Weatherfish population in Ball Creek (Chautauqua
County) has been known since at least 2001 (New York State Museum, NYSM
53924, 55379, 57313). A second population in eastern Long Island, in the vicinity of
Lake Ronkonkoma (NYSM 54195, 65640) has been known since at least 2003. Neither
population has been studied. In 2010, two more populations were discovered
in the Schoharie Creek drainage, Mohawk River, Schoharie County (NYSM 65919,
65922), and in a tributary to the Susquehanna River, Afton, Chenango County. Discovery
of a population of Oriental Weatherfish in the Hudson Valley in April 2009
was the impetus for our study to determine how widespread the species has become
in the Hudson Valley and to collect life-history data on this species. These data will
be useful in determining whether the founding populations of Oriental Weatherfish
exhibit attributes that suggest it may become invasive in the region. Most recently,
a population was discovered in 2013 (NYSM 68732, 68734) in the Klyne Esopus
Kill, a Hudson River tributary ≈6 km south of the mouth of Rondout Creek in Ulster
Park, Ulster County.
Methods
Study area
The first specimen of Oriental Weatherfish collected in the Hudson Valley
(NYSM 64681) was near the mouth of the Dwaar Kill in Ulster County, a tributary
of the Wallkill River. The Dwaar Kill is a low-gradient stream with long stretches
of sandy sediment and short, rocky riffles. Most of the areas we visited were 5–7 m
wide and, unless impounded, less than 1.2 m deep. There were no game fishes present,
and the most common large fishes were Catostomus commersonii (Lacepède)
(White Sucker) and the exotic Lepomis cyanellus (Rafinesque) (Green Sunfish). The
watershed is primarily rural with several lar ge horse farms near the Dwaar Kill.
We sampled the Dwaar Kill at the location where the first specimen was collected,
and at several sites upstream including tributaries in Ulster and Orange counties
(Fig. 1). Later, we sampled 5 sites in the Wallkill River upstream and downstream
of the mouth of the Dwaar Kill, 4 Wallkill River tributaries, and 2 sites on the lower
Rondout Creek, recipient of flow from the Wallkill River and a direct tributary to
the tidal Hudson River at Kingston, NY. Two of the Wallkill River tributaries were
within 2 km of the mouth of the Dwaar Kill, one was the Shawungunk Kill mouth
about 7 km downstream, and the last was the Klein Kill about 18 km downstream
in New Paltz, NY.
We used a Smith-Root backpack electroshocker to sample at about the same time
of day (late morning–early afternoon) at each site. The Dwaar Kill and its tributaries,
and the tributaries to the Wallkill River, were wadeable streams that we effectively
sampled with the backpack shocker. The shocker was only effective in the
shallow margins and backwaters of the Wallkill River and Rondout Creek. We determined
the preferred habitat of the Oriental Weatherfish by visual observation of
the catch among all available habitats. Once we defined the habitat for this species,
Northeastern Naturalist
136
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
we targeted our sampling in those areas. Fine-mesh dip-nets were used to collect
young-of-the-year (YOY) Oriental Weatherfish. At each location, we sampled until
we had collected 10–20 specimens, or until we had sampled all of the area available
Figure 1. Map of the Dwaar Kill in Orange and Ulster counties, NY and its relationship to
the downstream segments of the Wallkill River and Rondout Creek, Hudson River tributaries.
Sites sampled are indicated by circles. Solid circles indicate presence of Oriental
Weatherfish. Dams mentioned in the text are indicated by a line perpendicular to the stream.
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
137
(often in very small streams). We preserved specimens in 10% formalin in the field,
transported them to the laboratory, catalogued them, and deposited them in the New
York State Museum fish collection.
Laboratory procedures
We measured the total length (TL in cm) of each preserved specimen, weighed
them to the nearest 0.1 g, and recorded the presence of external sex-specific characteristics.
We kept very small specimens intact because they were difficult to find,
but we dissected larger individuals. We removed ovaries and eggs from all females
and weighed the fish again to obtain the ovary weight by subtraction. We examined
the ovaries with a dissecting microscope (30x), classified the sizes of all eggs present,
and categorized each female that had not spawned by the number of size classes
present. We used an ocular micrometer to measure the diameters of a small sample
of eggs from a subsample of 4 females and classified the eggs as large (average of
0.72 mm), medium (0.55 mm), and small (0.43 mm). We categorized very tiny oocytes
(less than 0.1 mm) as primary oocytes. We weighed a sample (to the nearest 0.01 g)
of the largest eggs from the females that had not spawned prior to capture, counted
the eggs, and recorded the estimated total number of lar ge eggs in the ovary.
To evaluate diet composition, we removed the anterior end of the intestine and
extracted the contents. We identified food items to broad taxonomic categories (e.g.,
Order) and counted them.
Sex
Males are smaller than females, and breeding males are distinguished by the development
of modified anterior pectoral fin rays (Breder and Rosen 1966, Urquhart
and Koetsier 2011). Mature males also have a raised keel running along the body
from under the dorsal fin to the caudal peduncle (Okamoto 1922, Vladykov 1935;
Fig. 2). This keel seems to function as a clasping device. Males clasp females by
bending their bodies around the female (see photograph in Kawanabe and Mzuno
1989). Females that had mated had mating abrasions on both sides of their bodies
dorsal to the vent (Fig. 2) that were probably caused by the horny ridges on the
males. We assumed that females without abrasions had not recently mated.
Results
We collected 111 Oriental Weatherfish in the Dwaar Kill including 35 females,
55 males, and 21 YOY, and we collected 8 specimens in two other tributaries of the
Wallkill River.
Distribution
Oriental Weatherfish were present throughout the Dwaar Kill drainage (Fig. 1),
from the headwaters near Circleville to the Bates Lane Bridge, in Wallkill. We collected
specimens in 3 unnamed tributaries—on Rt. 52 east of the Dwaar Kill (designated
T4 in Moore 1937), in Pine Bush west of the Dwaar Kill (T5), and in a very
small undesignated tributary 0.2 km north of the Orange/Ulster County border. The
Northeastern Naturalist
138
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
species occupies a beaver pond in tributary T4, and potentially occupies a private
impoundment downstream of Bates Lane, both of which were inaccessible to electrofishing
with a backpack shocker.
Outside of the Dwaar Kill drainage, we collected Oriental Weatherfish in an unnamed
stream tributary to the Wallkill River (T23) whose mouth was about 0.1 km
upstream of the mouth of the Dwaar Kill. We also collected specimens in the mouth
of the Shawangunk Kill, ≈7 km downstream (north) of the mouth of the Dwaar Kill.
Habitat use
All but 3 of the specimens collected (97.3%) were found in silty backwaters.
The substrate was typically layered with dead leaves and sticks and occasionally
Figure 2. Photograph of a mature female (top) and mature male (bottom) Oriental Weatherfish
from the Dwaar Kill, Hudson Valley, NY. Note the raised ridge on the posterior body
of the male (between the two arrows: appears to be a light area) and the abraded (light) area
anterior and dorsal to the vent in the female. The female has a similar abrasion on the other
side of the fish.
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
139
contained vascular plants. The 3 specimens collected in rocky habitats were taken
during high water. No Oriental Weatherfish were collected over sand.
Sex
A few male specimens had a second keel that extended from behind the operculum
to below the dorsal fin, but this anterior keel was never contiguous with the posterior
one (Vladykov 1935). This secondary keel is hard and sharp, and appears to be
made from dermal elements. Most of the adult females we collected (86.7%) had
spawning scars on their sides.
Size and age
Mean TL of males was 11.3 cm (range = 9.6–14.9), whereas mean TL of females
was 13.2 cm (range = 9.7–16.0). Based on length frequency (Fig. 3), mature males
were in their second summer (age 1) and mature females were in their second or
third summer (ages 1 or 2).
Feeding habits
We examined 94 Oriental Weatherfish stomachs, of which 61 were empty.
We broadly grouped stomach contents into 10 taxa (Table 1); a total of 688 food
items were classified. Snails comprised 14% of the total food items, Chironomidae
(midges) comprised 56%, and Simuliidae (blackflies) comprised 21%. By occurrence,
snails were found in 58% of the Oriental Weatherfish that contained food and
chironomid midges were seen in 68%.
There were apparent differences in food habits by location (Table 1). Fish from
the Pine Bush site fed predominantly on snails and chironomids. Fish from the
Figure 3. Length frequency of Oriental Weatherfish from the Dwaar Kill, Hudson Valley,
NY in 2009. Total length of males is represented by open bars and females by shaded bars.
Northeastern Naturalist
140
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
unnamed tributary on Rt. 52 consumed a wider variety of food items (10 taxa compared
to 2) and many more chironomids than snails. Fish from the Bates Lane site
ate mostly amphipods. Many of the fish caught later in the summer had empty guts.
Fecundity
Ovary weight varied between 4–19% of total body weight. Not coincidently, the
largest female caught (15.2 cm TL) had ovaries weighing 19% of total body weight
and exhibited no scarring from mating. Average percent ovary weight was lowest
in late June–early July, but the decrease was relatively small (Fig. 4).
The total oocytes ready to spawn in unmated females (determined by lack of
mating abrasions) ranged from 150–18,000. The number of large oocytes was
roughly correlated (R2 = 0.74) with body size (Fig. 5). Most females (68%) had
small, medium, and large oocytes in their ovaries; 7 females had only small and
medium oocytes, and 3 had only small oocytes. One female had 4 sizes of oocytes—
small, medium, large, and tiny primary oocytes visible in her ovaries.
Young of the year
YOY Oriental Weatherfish were difficult to capture. Early in the season, we only
found the very small YOY in leaf detritus at the very edges of a silty backwater. We
collected larger YOY Oriental Weatherfish in the same habitats as the adults, but we
found them in shallower water closer to the shoreline.
Table 1. Food habits of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Oriental Weatherfish) from 3 locations in the
Dwaar Kill, a Hudson River tributary, NY. Data were collected in early summer 2009. % = percent of
a given food item out of the total number of food items, occurrence = the percent of individuals with
food in their stomach that had that food item, X = indicates presence of algae.
Location
Pine Bush Rte. 52 tributary Bates Lane
% Occurrence % Occurrence % Occurrence
Prey category
Trichoptera 2.0 9.1 1.0 11.1
Coleoptera 1.2 11.1
Megaloptera 1.4 16.7
Diptera
Chironomidae 62.0 63.6 54.6 83.3
Simuliidae 33.4 22.2
Terrestrials 8.2 9.1 1.0 16.7 3.3 33.3
Amphipoda 96.8 100.0
Isopoda 1.8 22.2
Decapoda less than 1.0 5.5
Gastropoda 31.0 81.8 5.3 55.6
Pelecypoda 4.1 36.4 1.8 16.7
Algae X 9.1 X 33.3
# Fish examined 12 28 12
# Empty 1 10 7
# Food items 245 434 31
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
141
Discussion
We report the first record of Oriental Weatherfish in the Dwaar Kill and describe
basic biological attributes of the specimens captured. The Oriental Weatherfish has
colonized at least 20 km of the Dwaar Kill mainstem (plus several tributaries), and
Figure 4. Average ovary weight (as percent of total weight) of scarred female Oriental
Weatherfish from the Dwaar Kill, Hudson Valley, NY in 2009.
Figure 5. Estimated number of ready to spawn oocytes in unmated female Oriental Weatherfish
from the Dwaar Kill, Hudson Valley, NY in 2009.
Northeastern Naturalist
142
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
records indicate its presence in at least 8.5 km of the Wallkill River (Fig. 1), suggesting
that there is a well-established population there. We found no records of
sampling in the Dwaar Kill for the last 29 years. The most recent record of a fish
collection was 1981 (D. Carlson, New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Watertown, NY, pers. comm.) and no Oriental Weatherfish were
noted in that report. If sampling did not include electrofishing or failed to target
shallow silty margins, the species could have been overlooked. Regardless, enough
time has elapsed between sampling efforts to allow Oriental Weatherfish to take up
residence throughout the system. For example, Schultz (1960) recorded them in 16
km of a stream in Michigan and estimated entry into the system as sometime 9–21
years prior to the study.
Dams may limit the upstream distribution of Oriental Weatherfish in the Hudson
River watershed. No Oriental Weatherfish were collected upstream of the dam on
the Wallkill River in Wallkill (Fig. 1). The dam near the mouth of the Dwaar Kill
(Fig. 1) should have prevented this species from moving upstream; it appears the
introduction of Oriental Weatherfish into the Hudson River watershed occurred in
the Dwaar Kill. The sources of previously described Oriental Weatherfish introductions
include aquaculture (Hawaii; Fuller et al. 1999) and the pet trade (Michigan;
Schultz 1960). There are no known aquaculture operations in the Dwaar Kill watershed.
It seems likely that Oriental Weatherfish were introduced into the Dwaar Kill
via an aquarium release.
The results of our study indicate that Oriental Weatherfish prefer silty backwaters
and stream margins. Schultz (1960), Logan et al. (1996), and Tabor et al. (2001)
also observed Oriental Weatherfish primarily in silty-mud substrates. Additionally,
Logan et al. (1996) and Tabor et al. (2001) mentioned that Oriental Weatherfish
were often associated with aquatic vegetation. Our sample sites were largely devoid
of vegetation.
The Oriental Weatherfish is a batch-spawner in captivity (Suzuki 1976), releasing
a fraction of available eggs at any one time and spawning several times per
season. Suzuki (1983) reported 1815–15,524 eggs per spawning, a range very similar
to data from presumably unmated females we collected in the Dwaar Kill (Fig.
5). Females in Suzuki’s (1976) studies were 2–3 years old and 17–25 g body weight,
which closely resembles the findings for the Dwaar Kill specimen s.
Most Hudson Valley Oriental Weatherfish exhibited 3 visible size-classes of oocytes.
Suzuki (1983) also reported 3 size categories, but with different size ranges
than we describe in our study. Suzuki (1983) reported egg size-classes 0.05–0.2
mm diameter, 0.25–0.5 mm, and 0.55–0.85 mm. The latter two size categories are
similar to the range of oocyte sizes that we measured from specimens collected in
the Dwaar Kill. Presence of multiple egg sizes in unmated fish and correspondence
of egg number and size to Suzuki’s (1983) data strongly suggests that Oriental
Weatherfish in the Hudson Valley are also batch spawners.
Despite a substantial fecundity, we rarely captured YOY Oriental Weatherfish.
We collected the smallest specimens in piles of leaves in less than 2 cm of water on the margin
of a silty backwater. The very low catch of YOY may indicate poor recruitment
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
143
or that the YOY Oriental Weatherfish inhabit areas not sampled effectively with
electrofishing or dip-netting.
Oriental Weatherfish appear to be generalist benthic macroinvertebrate-feeders.
Feeding is probably nocturnal, and the fish select items based on gustation associated
with the barbels (Watanabe and Hidaka 1983). Food items ingested suggest
that they fed in the silty backwater habitats where they were usually captured. Few
riffle inhabitants were among the items consumed (Table 1). We hypothesize that
the Oriental Weatherfish is a non-selective benthic feeder and the variation in macroinvertebrates
consumed from site to site reflects the variation in prey availability.
Invasive potential in the Hudson Valley
Oriental Weatherfish has spread throughout the Dwaar Kill and into the mainstem
Wallkill River (Fig. 1) during the last 20–30 years. Within the Dwaar Kill, it
occupies all appropriate habitats accessible to sampling.
There is nothing preventing Oriental Weatherfish from entering the tidal Hudson
River (31.4 km NNE of the nearest documented location) and, indeed, it may
have done so already. Our 2013 collection of this species from the Klyne Esopus
Kill recorded some individuals from tidal freshwater habitat but within the stream
banks. If this newly discovered population was derived by dispersal from the
Wallkill River, this species has already moved through the tidal estuary. We have
no data on whether tidal wetlands would be suitable habitat. However, large areas
of silty substrates are available in the Hudson Estuary, chironomid midges and other
macroinvertebrates that Oriental Weatherfish consume are present in abundance,
and Oriental Weatherfish can breathe air through the large intestine (McMahon and
Burggren 1987); therefore, they can tolerate periods of anoxia and dewatering.
In the streams sampled, few vertebrates occupy the silty, leafy backwater habitat.
The vertebrates that occupy the backwaters of the Wallkill River are mostly YOY
White Sucker, Ameiurus natalis (Lesueur) (Yellow Bullhead), and Etheostoma olmstedi
Storer (Tessellated Darter) (R.E. Schmidt, unpubl. data), and these species are
found elsewhere and do not appear to be especially abundant in the backwaters. The
native Umbra pygmaea (DeKay) (Eastern Mudminnow) preferentially occupies
Wallkill River backwater habitats and is at the northern end of its range there (Smith
1985). Eastern Mudminnows may compete for food with Oriental Weatherfish.
On the other hand, vertebrates are abundant in the tidal freshwater marshes.
This fauna is dominated by killifishes (Fundulidae) but can seasonally include YOY
Cyprinidae, Moronidae, Centrarchidae, and other fishes. Oriental Weatherfish could
be a serious competitor with native tidal Hudson River fishes if their populations
become much more dense than what we observed in stream habitats. There are few
data available that are useful in determining whether this conc ern is justified.
Acknowledgments
We thank Nik Kotovich, Leah Pitman, Margot Boucher, Nico Hernandez, Ian Hetterich,
and Dave Yozzo for help in the field. Kathy Schmidt is responsible for dra fting and editing
the figures. Bob Daniels, Michael Wagner, and anonymous reviewers read and improved the
Northeastern Naturalist
144
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014 Vol. 21, No. 1
manuscript. This study was funded by grant 008/09A to the Berkshire Environmental Research
Center from the Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research,
Inc., a New York not-for-profit organization. The views expressed herein do not necessarily
reflect the belief or opinions of the Foundation, which assumes no responsibility or liability
for the contents or use of the information herein.
Literature Cited
Breder, C.M., Jr., and D.E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of Reproduction in Fishes. TFH Publications,
Jersey City, NJ. 941 pp.
Daniels, R.A., K.E. Limburg, R.E. Schmidt, D.L. Strayer, and R.C. Chambers. 2005.
Changes in fish assemblages in the tidal Hudson River, New York. American Fisheries
Society Symposium 45:471–503.
Dove, A.D. and F. Ernst. 1998. Concurrent invaders: Four exotic species of Monogenea
now established on exotic freshwater fishes in Australia. International Journal for Parasitology
28:1755–1764.
Fuller, P.L., L.G. Nico, and J.D. Williams. 1999. Nonindigenous Fishes Introduced into
Inland Waters of the United States. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication #27,
Bethesda, MD. 613 pp.
Kawanabe, H., and N. Mzuno. 1989. Freshwater Fishes of Japan. Yamakei Publishers,
Tokyo, Japan. 720 pp.
Logan, D.J., E.L. Bibles, and D.F. Markle. 1996. Recent collections of exotic aquarium
fishes in the freshwaters of Oregon and thermal tolerance of Oriental Weatherfish and
Pirapitinga. California Fish and Game 82:66–80.
McMahon, B.R., and W.E. Burggren. 1987. Respiratory physiology of intestinal air breathing
in the teleost fish Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. The Journal of Experimental Biology
133:371–393.
Moore, E. 1937. A Biological Survey of the Lower Hudson Watershed. Supplement to the
26th Annual Report, State of New York Conservation Department, Albany, NY. 373 pp.
Okamoto, K. 1922. Secondary sexual characters in the loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus
Cantor. Philippine Journal of Science 19:723–725.
Page, L.M., and C.A. Laird. 1993. The identification of the nonnative fishes inhabiting Illinois
waters. Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity Technical Report
1993. 39 pp.
Schultz, E.E. 1960. Establishment and early dispersal of a loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus
(Cantor), in Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 89:376–377.
Smith, C.L. 1985. Inland Fishes of New York State. New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Albany, NY. 522 pp.
Suzuki, R. 1976. Number of ovarian eggs and spawned eggs and their size composition
in the loach, cyprinid fish. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries
42:961–967.
Suzuki, R. 1983. Multiple spawning of the cyprinid Loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus.
Aquaculture 31:233–243.
Tabor, R.A., E. Warner, and S. Hager. 2001. An Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus)
population established in Washington State. Northwest Science 75:72–76.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2010. Nonindigenous aquatic species. Available
online at http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=498. Accessed 15
August 2010.
Urquhart, A.N., and P. Koetsier. 2011. Pectoral fin morphology as a reliable field sexing
Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 21, No. 1
R.E. Schmidt and A.J. Schmidt
2014
145
characteristic in populations of the invasive Oriental Weatherfish (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus).
Copeia 2011:296–300.
Vladykov, V.D. 1935. Secondary sexual dimorphism in some Chinese cobitid fishes. Journal
of Morphology 57:275-302.
Watanabe, K., and T. Hidaka. 1983. Feeding behavior of the Japanese loach Misgurnus
anguillicaudatus (Cobitidae). Journal of Ethology 1:86–90.