Managing Marginal Populations of the Rare Wetland Plant
Trollius laxus Salisbury (Spreading Globeflower):
Consideration of Light Levels, Herbivory, and Pollination
Kristina N. Jones and Susan M. Klemetti
Northeastern Naturalist, Volume 19, Issue 2 (2012): 267–278
Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers.To subscribe click here.)
Access Journal Content
Open access browsing of table of contents and abstract pages. Full text pdfs available for download for subscribers.
Current Issue: Vol. 30 (3)
Check out NENA's latest Monograph:
Monograph 22
2012 NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST 19(2):267–278
Managing Marginal Populations of the Rare Wetland Plant
Trollius laxus Salisbury (Spreading Globeflower):
Consideration of Light Levels, Herbivory, and Pollination
Kristina N. Jones1,* and Susan M. Klemetti1,2
Abstract - To address the question of how succession in protected habitats might be
managed to favor rare understory plants in the Northeast, this study examined whether reducing
shade might have negative impacts via increased herbivory or reduced pollination.
We studied marginal populations of Trollius laxus Salisbury (Spreading Globeflower), a
rare herbaceous plant of calcareous wetlands, making observations of natural variation
in one population, and experimentally cutting back herbaceous neighboring plants in
another. In a Trollius population under a mixed canopy, we quantified natural light levels
at each plant and tested for correlations with measures of reproduction and herbivory.
Flowering and fruit production were positively correlated with light level in one of the
two years measured, while herbivore damage and plant growth were uncorrelated with
light level. In another study population, where the woody canopy had been removed
previously, experimental clipping of herbaceous neighbors did not increase herbivore
damage to T. laxus, nor did it decrease flowering or fruit production. Also, the few potential
pollinators observed were all small insects unlikely to be negatively affected by
increased light. Our results suggest that management to reduce shade in these marginal
T. laxus populations is unlikely to have a negative impact on these rare plants via their
herbivores and pollinators.
Introduction
Habitat protection is a critical step towards conservation of rare species;
however, it has become increasingly clear that this act alone is not sufficient
for the long-term persistence of many species (Heywood and Iriondo 2003).
With the suppression of disturbances such as fires and floods, species adapted
to habitats formerly prone to these disturbances may be at risk. Even protected
habitats often need active management of disturbance and succession to enable
the persistence of rare species (Hobbs and Huenneke 1992, Oostermeijer
2003, Scanga 2009). Given the complexity of most biological communities, it
can be difficult to predict whether the net effect on a target species will be positive
or negative, yet management decisions often must be made before specific
information on likely impacts is available. Studies of responses to management
practices such as canopy thinning are urgently needed to inform these practices
in a range of habitats.
Trollius laxus Salisbury (Spreading Globeflower) is an early- to mid-successional
plant species, which generally competes poorly with larger herbaceous and
1Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley,
MA 02481. 2Current address - Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Denison University,
Granville, OH 43023. *Corresponding author - kjones@wellesley.edu.
268 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
woody species (Mitchell and Sheviak 1981). It is a globally rare species found
only in the northeastern United States, where it is the sole representative of its
genus (Parfitt 1997). Despite growing well in cultivation under unspecialized
garden conditions (K. Jones, pers. observ.), T. laxus is restricted in the wild to
wetlands with cold, alkaline groundwater discharge (Bliss 1985, Jones 2001).
Habitat destruction is primarily responsible for the overall decline of T. laxus
over the last century (NatureServe 2008), but even within protected areas several
populations have continued to dwindle, especially at the edges of the species’
range (Jones 2001). Thus, in many cases, it appears that active management is
required to prevent local extirpation of this species.
Current management practices at T. laxus sites primarily involve canopy manipulation
to increase light, along with control of invasive species (Jones 2001,
Scanga 2009). Previous studies have shown that T. laxus generally responds
positively to decreasing shade (Leimanis 1994, Zielinski 1993), except perhaps
in conditions with low water availability (Rhinehalt 1990). In a definitive
multi-year study of canopy manipulation on scattered subpopulations of a robust
T. laxus population in New York, T. laxus performance initially increased following
experimental canopy gap formation and then declined over time (Scanga
2009). Other understory plant species also may respond to higher light conditions,
so the net effect of canopy thinning or removal on Trollius populations is
likely to depend at least in part on interactions such as competition with other
species (Scanga 2009).
Management practices also may affect herbivores and pollinators of Trollius.
In general, insects may be more frequent and/or more active in the sun and
at warmer temperatures than in the shade. For example, caterpillars have been
shown to eat more in warmer temperatures (Levesque et al. 2002). Removal
of shade greatly increased insect herbivory on Cardamine cordifolia A. Gray
(Heartleaf Bittercress), and there is evidence that this plant species is restricted
to shade by herbivory (Louda and Rodman 1996). Higher light levels in canopy
gaps also have been correlated with higher mammalian herbivory (Maschinski
et al. 1997). Also, stem elongation in response to light competition may make
some plants more palatable to herbivores (e.g., Cipollini and Bergelson 2002,
Kurashige and Agrawal 2005). On the other hand, plants in high light may have
more chemical or physical defenses than those growing in lower light (Henriksson
et al. 2003, Wang and Lincoln 2004) or may be able to tolerate defoliation
better under high-light conditions (Baraza et al. 2004, Gleason and Ares 2004).
Evaluation of canopy manipulation as a management tool for plant populations
should include consideration of its impacts on herbivory.
Management to increase light should have more predictable effects on pollinators,
especially insects, as greater activity is generally beneficial to the plants.
Rare plants often have difficulty attracting and supporting pollinators, especially
if flowering is sparse (Dauber et al. 2010, Kunin 1993). In early spring, when
Trollius laxus blooms, the energetics of insect foraging are generally more favorable
under warmer conditions (Heinrich 1979). Flowers receiving direct sun for
longer periods may be more attractive if emission of attractive scent volatiles is
2012 K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti 269
correlated with flower temperature (e.g., Sagae et al. 2008), and pollinators may
be capable of flying longer distances upon leaving warm flowers than cool ones
(Heinrich 1979). Identifying pollinators is the first step toward determining how
light manipulations are likely to influence pollination for a rare plant.
This study examined implications for herbivory and pollination of Trollius
laxus due to management practices to increase light in marginal populations at
the eastern edge of the species’ range. Specifically, we tested for correlations
between light and herbivory levels, as well as plant growth and reproduction,
in a population with naturally variable canopy cover; evaluated the effects of
clipping herbaceous neighbors on T. laxus growth, reproduction, and herbivory
in a population whose woody canopy had been removed; and identified insect
visitors that seemed likely to serve as effective pollinators for T. laxus flowers
in these populations.
Methods
Species description
Trollius laxus (Spreading Globeflower) is an herbaceous perennial with longpetioled
basal leaves atop thick, fibrous roots (Fig.1). One or more stems, each with
a terminal flower, continue to elongate as the flower and fruit mature. The flowers
are quite showy, up to 5 cm in diameter, with five to seven cream or pale yellow
petaloid sepals. The actual petals are much reduced (staminodes), with nectar
glands at the base (Parfitt 1997). The plants are among the first species to emerge
and flower in spring, typically from mid-April through early May in Connecticut.
Figure 1. Trollius laxus not quite in bloom in an experimental plot with herbaceous neighbors
clipped short, at the Sharon, CT study site.
270 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
The seeds ripen by mid-June and are believed to be dispersed passively by gravity
plus wind, rain, and seasonally high water (Parsons and Yates 1984).
Field-site description
There are six known extant populations of T. laxus in New England, all of
them in Litchfield County, CT at the eastern edge of the species’ range (Brumback
et al. 1996). The center of the species’ range, in central New York state, has
much larger populations with more robust plants. All of the Connecticut populations
have declined in the last hundred years, in most cases despite protection
of the immediate habitat, and almost all currently have fewer than 100 plants;
three additional Connecticut occurrences documented in the early 1900s have
since become extirpated (Jones 2001). Of the existing populations, three have a
woody canopy cover and three do not have a canopy (including a cemetery and
a power line right-of-way). We chose one population of each type, each with at
least 50 T. laxus plants, for this study. Both populations are within 10 m of a pond
edge and frequently include areas of standing water, particularly in spring. The
population with a canopy is in the town of Canaan, and the open site is in Sharon.
Confidentiality of the exact locations is mandated by the Connecticut Department
of Environmental Protection.
Observations under natural canopy
At the Canaan site, we monitored 70 T. laxus plants in two adjacent seeps
over the 2002 and 2003 growing seasons. The mixed coniferous and broadleaf
canopy varied considerably over the site. We tested for correlations between light
levels and measures of plant growth and reproduction as well as damage due to
herbivory. There were eight additional plants present in 2002 that did not reappear
in 2003, and several seedlings that appeared in 2003, but the 70 monitored
plants were all that were present in both years at this site. Herbivory levels were
low overall in 2003, so we returned the following spring to measure herbivory in
2004 on the same 70 plants.
For each plant, we counted the number of basal leaves (representative of plant
size), flowers, and developed carpels. The number of expanded carpels served as
a nondestructive proxy for seed set; similar-sized plants in CT averaged 5.5 seeds
per developed carpel (Zielinski 1993), and the number of developed carpels per
flower was quite variable (range = 0 to 16 at the Canaan site). Leaf damage due
to herbivory was assigned an index, ranging from 0 (no damage) to 3 (more than
50% of leaf tissue missing), through the month of May each year. We measured
the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, in mmol m-2 s-1) reaching
each of the 70 plants on 7 May 2003 at approximately midday (1200 h) and midafternoon
(1430 h), using an EMS-7 Canopy Transmission Meter (PP Systems,
Haverhill, MA). Light levels varied dramatically, from plants experiencing direct
sun at noon (930 mmol m-2 s-1) to one mostly covered by Symplocarpus foetidus
(L.) Salisb. ex W.P.C. Barton (Skunk Cabbage) leaves, and others under multiple
canopy layers (mean PAR measured was 247, range = 12–930 mmol m-2 s-1).
This measured variation most likely overestimated variation among the plants
in total PAR received as sun flecks moved across the understory over the course
2012 K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti 271
of a day. Therefore, we used nonparametric correlations to compare the rank orders
rather than actual values of these data. Spearman’s rank correlations tested
whether plants receiving more light also had more herbivore damage, flowers, or
developed carpels, or a greater increase in number of leaves from 2002 to 2003.
All data analyses were performed using JMP 7.0 (SAS Institute 2007).
Experimental clipping of herbaceous neighbors
The site with no woody canopy (Sharon) had been cut with a weed trimmer
once a year in the fall or early spring for at least four years prior to this study,
maintaining it as a small wet meadow at the edge of a pond. Following Castor
canadensis Kuhl (Beaver) disturbance to the area in 2001, the site was fenced
to keep out large mammals. We divided the fenced area into 1-m2 plots, 13 of
which contained T. laxus plants, with an average of 4.7 Trollius and a range
of 1–18 plants per plot. Plots were randomly assigned either to have all non-
Trollius vegetation within the plot hand clipped to approximately 3 cm above
soil level (7 plots; see Fig. 1), or to remain unclipped (6 plots). Plots were
clipped at the earliest date after the T. laxus plants had emerged and expanded
their leaves, on 19 April 2002 and 27 April 2003, while “unclipped” plots on the
same days had the vegetation handled but not clipped, so that all plots had similar
amounts of trampling and disturbance aside from the actual clipping.
Herbivory was quantified in 2002 and 2003 using the same index as in the
observational study. Change in leaf number between years again served as a
measure of growth. Because T. laxus blooms immediately after emergence, using
resources stored from previous growing seasons, we tested for effects of clipping
on flowering and carpel development the following year after clipping (2003 and
2004). Plots rather than individual plants were the experimental units; therefore
values per plant were averaged to yield one data point per plot for each of the
response variables. Two-tailed t-tests were used to evaluate whether response
variables (number of flowers, number of developed carpels, level of herbivore
damage, change in leaf number) in clipped and unclipped plots were the same.
Pollination
While performing weekly surveys of herbivory and flowering in April and
May of 2002 and 2003, we noted any potential pollinators visiting T. laxus flowers.
With so few flowers in the populations (the 70 plants at the Canaan site had
a combined total of 32 flowers over the 2002 blooming season and 47 in 2003,
and the Sharon site had only nine flowers in 2002 and 47 in 2003), there was not
enough pollinator activity to warrant pollinator behavior observations, but we did
observe a few small bees, flies, and ants in the flowers, and captured and identifi
ed a sample of them.
Results
Observations under natural canopy
We found no significant correlations between herbivore damage and natural
light levels (PAR) at each plant’s location within the Canaan site (Table 1, Fig. 2).
272 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
There was a weakly positive correlation between light levels and the number of
flowers per plant, and between light and the number of developed carpels in 2002
(Table 1, Fig. 3). In 2003, the only significant correlation between light levels and
Table 1. Spearman rank correlations (r) between May light levels (PAR received at the location of
each T. laxus plant at 1200 h and 1430 h, and the mean of these two values) and numbers of flowers
and developed carpels per plant, growth in leaf number from one year to the next, and levels of
herbivory. * indicates significant correlation at 0.01 < P < 0.05.
# flowers # carpels Growth Herbivory
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002–03 2002 2003 2004
PAR 1200 h 0.262* 0.164 0.244* -0.033 0.007 -0.077 -0.133 -0.004
PAR 1430h 0.294* 0.261* 0.234* 0.173 0.064 -0.102 0.016 0.044
PAR mean 0.273* 0.198 0.257* 0.002 0.028 -0.092 -0.122 -0.002
Figure 2. Relationships
between amount of herbivore
damage and light
levels (PAR, in mmol
m-2
s-1) measured at each
plant under a mixed canopy,
in years of relatively
high (2002) and low
(2003) herbivore damage.
Neither correlation
is significantly different
from zero.
2012 K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti 273
measures of reproduction was a weakly positive one between PAR at 1430 h and
number of flowers per plant (Table 1). Growth in leaf number from 2002 to 2003
was uncorrelated with light levels (Table 1).
Experimental clipping of herbaceous neighbors
The increased exposure of T. laxus plants in plots where neighboring vegetation
was clipped had no negative effects on any of the measured response
variables (Table 2). Sample sizes were too small to detect significant effects, but
all measures of growth and reproduction, but not herbivory, had larger average
values in clipped plots than in unclipped plots in both years. Trollius plants in
plots clipped in 2002 emerged significantly earlier in 2003 (by 2.7 days; t = 2.31,
P = 0.042) than did the Trollius in unclipped plots.
Figure 3. Relationships
between
components of
r e p r o d u c t i o n
(A: number of
flowers per plant;
B: number of developed
carpels
per plant) and
light levels (PAR,
in mmol m-2
s-1)
measured at each
plant under a
mixed canopy.
The line in each
graph represents
the best linear fit
for these signifi-
cantly positive
correlations.
274 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
Pollination
Visits by potential pollinators to T. laxus flowers at the two sites were rare,
but we did capture a few, including two kinds of bees and a fly that may be
effective pollinators. These were: a Sweat bee—Lasioglossum (Dialictus) sp.
female with pollen in her scopa (family Halictidae); a Cuckoo bee—Nomada
sp. female (family Apidae), and a fly in the family Tachinidae—a parasitic
fly with long mouthparts that probably feeds on nectar as an adult. There
were also several unidentified ants, only one of which had any Trollius pollen
(a single grain) on its body.
Discussion
The primary concern motivating this study was that management to increase
light in marginal Trollius laxus populations may have some detrimental effects
on these rare plants, primarily via increased herbivory. Increasing light by cutting
back woody or herbaceous competitors may have the unintended consequence
of making Trollius plants more apparent to herbivores, or of creating abiotic
conditions more favorable to herbivore activity. However, our results do not
substantiate these concerns, at least for the two populations studied. There was
no correlation between light and herbivory levels in the population under a variable
woody canopy, and herbivory was not greater in plots where all non-Trollius
herbaceous plants were clipped short, compared to unclipped plots. There was
considerably more leaf damage in 2002 and 2004 than in 2003, but whether herbivory
levels were high or low, there was no relationship to light levels under the
natural canopy at the Canaan site in any of the three years.
We did not observe much herbivore activity, despite spending over 100
hours in these populations. Either herbivores were active mostly from dusk
to dawn, or our presence suppressed their activity. Although nocturnal activity
seems unlikely to depend on small-scale daytime light levels, clipping the
surrounding vegetation nonetheless may make the remaining Trollius plants
easier to find. On the other hand, this practice also reduces cover for animals
Table 2. Effects of clipping neighboring herbaceous vegetation in 2002 and 2003 on T. laxus production
of flowers and developed carpels per plant in 2003 and 2004, growth in leaf number from 2002
to 2003, maximum leaf size (cm2), and herbivory levels in 2002 and 2003. n = 7 clipped plots and 6
unclipped plots, all at the Sharon site. Data shown are mean ± standard error of these plot values.
Clipped Unclipped t P
# flowers 2003 1.20 ± 0.29 0.46 ± 0.32 1.79 0.107
# carpels 2003 6.54 ± 1.90 2.47 ± 2.05 1.55 0.159
# flowers 2004 0.87 ± 0.27 0.48 ± 0.29 1.03 0.326
# carpels 2004 5.32 ± 1.55 2.67 ± 1.68 1.20 0.258
Increase in leaf # 1.91 ± 0.51 0.61 ± 0.55 1.72 0.113
Largest leaf size 36.2 ± 3.6 34.5 ± 3.9 0.30 >0.5
Herbivory 2002 0.75 ± 0.18 0.89 ± 0.20 0.52 >0.5
Herbivory 2003 0.12 ± 0.05 0.13 ± 0.05 0.14 >0.5
2012 K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti 275
such as slugs and caterpillars and may therefore reduce herbivore presence in
the general area. During night censuses at a California old-field site, Strauss et
al. (2009) found that herbivorous mollusks (slugs and snails) were more abundant
in areas of taller herbaceous vegetation. We did observe occasional slugs
on Trollius leaves, and the most common leaf damage was consistent with
the type of damage resulting from slugs. Slugs are introduced generalist herbivores
that can impact both the biomass and diversity of plant communities
(Bruelheide and Scheidel 1999, Buschmann et al. 2005). Slugs also can have a
strong impact on seedling establishment (Joe and Daehler 2008), which we did
not quantify. In a study of Trollius europeaus in Scotland, slug predation had
a dramatic impact on seedling survival, and this predation was significantly
greater in unmowed compared to mowed wet meadow areas (Hitchmough
2003). In T. laxus populations with ample flowering but low seedling recruitment,
it may be fruitful to examine nocturnal seedling herbivory.
It is important to note that the clipping experiment was carried out in a population
that was fenced, keeping out deer and other mammals that may browse the
plants, particularly the fruits that are held considerably above the rest of the plant.
More than 90% of fruits were browsed in a Colorado population of Trollius albifl
orus (K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti, unpubl. data), a similar and closely related
species found in western North America (Parfitt 1997). It is possible that clipping
the surrounding vegetation may exacerbate such browsing, but our experiment
did not address this issue. Reduced competition for light may be accomplished by
clipping a much smaller area, such as a 10-cm radius around each Trollius plant,
to minimize changes in plant apparency to browsers.
In addition to suggesting that foliar herbivory is not an increased concern
with management to reduce competition for light in Trollius laxus populations,
our results indicate that such management is likely to provide an overall benefit
to T. laxus plants in these marginal populations. Correlations with higher light
levels were either positive or insignificant for measures of plant growth and
reproduction, with the most positive effects on flowering. These results from
a marginal population are consistent with those from another observational
study in what is probably the largest extant T. laxus population, in a New York
forested fen, in which higher light levels were positively correlated with Trollius
reproductive performance (Scanga and Leopold 2010). Also, data from the
clipping experiment suggest that cutting back neighboring plants may increase
Trollius growth and reproduction, although the sample sizes were too small to
conclude such benefits with much confidence. There was no hint of negative effects
of neighbor clipping on any measured aspect of growth and reproduction
in this Trollius population.
In contrast, a parallel experiment using the same methods in a subalpine
population of Trollius albiflorus in Colorado resulted in lower numbers of developed
carpels and smaller leaf sizes in plots with clipped neighbors than in
unclipped plots (S.M. Klemetti and K.N. Jones, unpubl. data). We had hoped
that this closely related and much more abundant species might serve as a useful
276 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
model for T. laxus for further experimental purposes, but found that their habitats
are notably distinct, as T. albiflorus occurs in more acidic, montane to alpine
wetlands rather than the alkaline seeps and fens of T. laxus (Parfitt 1997), and
ecologically the two species seem quite different from each other.
Increasing light is also unlikely to have negative impacts on pollination of
T. laxus. The small bees and flies that we observed in T. laxus flowers in April and
early May can probably forage better in direct sun than in shade, especially under
cool spring temperatures. When sunlight and temperature conditions permit longer
flight distances, such pollinators are more likely to be able to visit sequential
rewarding Trollius flowers, even if they are widely separated relative to more
common flowers. Lack of “constancy” by generalist pollinators is a problem for
rare plants, as it can severely limit the efficiency of pollen transfer (e.g., Peter
and Johnson 2009). The presence of seedlings in both study populations in 2003
and 2004 indicated at least some successful reproduction in these sites.
In summary, this study did not substantiate concerns that manipulations to
increase light might be detrimental to Trollius laxus plants in marginal populations.
Such management may provide direct benefits to the plants without
increasing risk of herbivory. With the reduction of natural disturbance, such as
flooding, and limited dispersal ability in fragmented landscapes, active management
probably is required for the persistence of a significant proportion of
the remaining T. laxus populations.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jason Jannot for assistance with fieldwork, Sara Scanga and Alden Griffith
for helpful comments on the manuscript, and William Brumback, Michael Dudek, and
Rose Walsh for permission to work at the sites. Dr. Robbin Thorp kindly identified the
insect visitors we collected from T. laxus flowers. This study was funded in part by a
National Science Foundation/New England Wild Flower Society Fellowship in Conservation
Biology (to S.M. Klemetti).
Literature Cited
Baraza, E., J. Gomez, J. Hodar, and R. Zamora. 2004. Herbivory has a greater impact in
shade than in sun: Response of Quercus pyrenaica seedlings to multifactorial environmental
variation. Canadian Journal of Botany 82:357–364.
Bliss, P. 1985. Element steward abstract for Trollius laxus ssp. laxus—Spreading Globefl
ower. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.
Bruelheide, H., and U. Scheidel. 1999. Slug herbivory as a limiting factor for the geographical
range of Arnica montana. Journal of Ecology 87:839–848.
Brumback, W.E., L.J. Mehrhoff, R.W. Enser, S.C. Gawler, R.G. Popp, P. Somers, D.D.
Sperduto, W.E. Countryman, and C.B. Hellquist. 1996. Flora conservanda: New England.
Rhodora 98:233–361.
Buschmann, H., M. Keller, N. Porret, H. Dietz, and P.J. Edwards. 2005. The effect of
slug grazing on vegetation development and plant species diversity in an experimental
grassland. Functional Ecology 19:291–298.
Cipollini, D.F., and J. Bergelson. 2002. Interspecific competition affects growth and herbivore
damage of Brassica napus in the field. Plant Ecology 162:227–231.
2012 K.N. Jones and S.M. Klemetti 277
Dauber, J., J.C. Biesmeijer, D. Gabriel, W.E. Kunin, E. Lamborn, B. Meyer, A. Nielsen,
S.G. Potts, S.P.M. Roberts, V. Sõber, J. Settele, I. Steffan-Dewenter, J.C. Stout, T.
Teder, T. Tscheulin, D. Vivarelli, and T. Petanidou. 2010. Effects of patch size and
density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: A pan-European approach.
Journal of Ecology 98:188–196.
Gleason, S.M., and A. Ares. 2004. Photosynthesis, carbohydrate storage, and survival
of a native and an introduced tree species in relation to light and defoliation. Tree
Physiology 24:1087–1097.
Heinrich, B. 1979. Bumblebee Economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
245 pp.
Henriksson, J., E. Haukioja, V. Ossipov, S. Ossipova, S. Sillanpaa, L. Kapari, and K.
Pihlaja. 2003. Effects of host shading on consumption and growth of the geometrid
Epirrita autumnata: Interactive roles of water, primary, and secondary compounds.
Oikos 103:3–16.
Heywood, V.H., and J.M. Iriondo. 2003. Plant conservation: Old problems, new perspectives.
Biological Conservation 113:321–335.
Hitchmough, J.D. 2003. Effects of sward height, gap size, and slug grazing on emergence
and establishment of Trollius europaeus (Globeflower). Restoration Ecology
11:20–28.
Hobbs, R.J., and L.F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications
for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337.
Joe, S.M., and C.C. Daehler. 2008. Invasive slugs as under-appreciated obstacles to
rare plant restoration: Evidence from the Hawaiian Islands. Biological Invasions
10:245–255.
Jones, K.N. 2001. Trollius laxus (Spreading Globeflower) Conservation and Research
Plan. New England Plant Conservation Program, Framingham, MA. 28 pp.
Kunin, W.E. 1993. Sex and the single mustard: Population-density and pollinator-behavior
effects on seed set. Ecology 74:2145–2160.
Kurashige, N.S., and A.A. Agrawal. 2005. Phenotypic plasticity to light competition and
herbivory in Chenopodium album (Chenopodiaceae). American Journal of Botany
92:21–26.
Leimanis, A.A. 1994. Habitat characteristics of Trollius laxus spp. laxus (Spreading
Globeflower) in a minerotrophic forested peatland in central New York. M.Sc. Thesis.
College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY, Syracuse, NY.
Levesque, K.R., M. Fortin, and Y. Mauffette. 2002. Temperature and food-quality effects
on growth, consumption, and post-ingestive utilization efficiencies of the Forest Tent
Caterpillar Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Bulletin of Entomological
Research 92:127–136.
Louda, S.M., and J.E. Rodman. 1996. Insect herbivory as a major factor in the shade
distribution of a native crucifer (Cardamine cordifolia A. Gray, Bittercress). Journal
of Ecology 84:229–237.
Maschinski, J., T.E. Kolb, E. Smith, and B. Phillips. 1997. Potential impacts of timber
harvesting on a rare understory plant, Clematis hirsutissima var. arizonica. Biological
Conservation 80:49–61.
Mitchell, R.S., and C.J. Sheviak. 1981. Rare plants of New York State. The University of
the State of New York, State Education Department, Albany, NY.
NatureServe. 2008. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life. Version 7.0.
NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available online at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer.
Accessed: 23 October 2008.
278 Northeastern Naturalist Vol. 19, No. 2
Oostermeijer, J.G.B. 2003. Threats to rare plant persistence. In Population viability in
plants: Conservation, management, and modeling of rare plants. C.A. Brigham and
M.W. Schwartz (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Parfitt, B. 1997. Trollius. Pp. 189–190, In Flora of North America Editorial Committee,
Flora of North America. Vol. 3. Oxford University Press, NY. 590 pp.
Parsons, B.C., and T.A. Yates. 1984. The cultural requirements of Trollius laxus Salisb.
ssp. laxus. Report for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and the Ohio Biological
Survey, Holden Arboretum, 9500 Sperry Road, Kirtland, OH 44094.
Peter, C.I., and S.D. Johnson. 2009. Reproductive biology of Acrolophia cochlearis
(Orchidaceae): Estimating rates of cross-pollination in epidendroid orchids. Annals
of Botany 104:573–581.
Rhinehalt, G.A. 1990. Ecology of Trollius laxus, an endangered species in Ohio. M.Sc.
Thesis. Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Sagae, M., N. Oyama-Okubo, T. Ando, E. Marchesi, and M. Nakayama. 2008. Effect of
temperature on the floral scent emission and endogenous volatile profile of Petunia
axillaris. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 72:110–115.
SAS Institute. 2007. JMP version 7.0.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Scanga, S.E. 2009. Population ecology of the rare wetland plant Trollius laxus (Ranunculaceae).
Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York, College of Environmental
Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.
Scanga, S.E., and D.J. Leopold. 2010. Population vigor of a rare, wetland, understory
herb in relation to light and hydrology. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society
137:297-311.
Strauss, S.Y., M.L. Stanton, N.C. Emery, C.A. Bradley, A. Carleton, D.R. Dittrich-Reed,
O.A. Ervin, L.N. Gray, A.M. Hamilton, J. Harrington Rogge, S.D. Harper, K. Cook
Law, V.Q. Pham, M.E. Putnam, T.M. Roth, J.H. Theil, L.M. Wells, and E.M. Yoshizuka.
2009. Cryptic seedling herbivory by nocturnal introduced generalists impacts
survival, performance of native and exotic plants. Ecology 90:419–429.
Wang, M., and D.E. Lincoln. 2004. Effects of light intensity and artificial wounding on
monoterpene production in Myrica cerifera from two different ecological habitats.
Canadian Journal of Botany 82:1501–1508.
Zielinski, M.L. 1993. Demography, genetic diversity, and light requirements of the rare
plant species Trollius laxus ssp. laxus. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT.