Approximating the Mean Post-mortem Brain Mass and Brain to Body Mass Ratio of Adult Male White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in North Dakota, USA
Cami M. Wight1 and Charlie S. Bahnson1,*
1North Dakota Game and Fish Department, Wildlife Health Lab, 3001 E. Main Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501 (USA). *Corresponding author.
Prairie Naturalist, Volume 57 (2025):33–37
Abstract
Current scientific literature lacks a reference for the average brain mass of male White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), the most widely distributed cervid in North America. A reference for brain tissue mass may be useful for better understanding transmission risk of chronic wasting disease (CWD), an important neurologic disease of cervids. In a recent study, oral consumption of 100–300 ng of CWD-contaminated brain tissue was sufficient for disease transmission, which is concerning considering the documented persistence of CWD-causing prions within carcasses of infected animals on the landscape. We individually measured the mass of brain tissue from 29 adult male White-tailed Deer from 17 deer hunting units across North Dakota, yielding an average mass of 182.7 grams (n = 29; 95% Confidence Interval = 177.2–188.2). These findings demonstrate that a single deer head moved across jurisdictions and left on the landscape could contain infectious doses numbering in the hundreds of millions. This information further supports CWD-related regulations such as carcass transport restrictions and approved disposal requirements. We also present the first known publication of brain to body mass ratio and encephalization quotient of North American White-tailed Deer (1.094) from a subset of our adult male samples.
Download Full-text pdf
Prairie Naturalist
Approximating the Mean Post-mortem Brain Mass and
Brain to Body Mass Ratio of Adult Male White-tailed Deer
(Odocoileus virginianus) in North Dakota, USA
Cami M. Wight1 and Charlie S. Bahnson1,*
Abstract – Current scientific literature lacks a reference for the average brain mass of male Whitetailed
Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), the most widely distributed cervid in North America. A reference
for brain tissue mass may be useful for better understanding transmission risk of chronic wasting
disease (CWD), an important neurologic disease of cervids. In a recent study, oral consumption of
100–300 ng of CWD-contaminated brain tissue was sufficient for disease transmission, which is concerning
considering the documented persistence of CWD-causing prions within carcasses of infected
animals on the landscape. We individually measured the mass of brain tissue from 29 adult male
White-tailed Deer from 17 deer hunting units across North Dakota, yielding an average mass of 182.7
grams (n = 29; 95% Confidence Interval = 177.2–188.2). These findings demonstrate that a single deer
head moved across jurisdictions and left on the landscape could contain infectious doses numbering in
the hundreds of millions. This information further supports CWD-related regulations such as carcass
transport restrictions and approved disposal requirements. We also present the first known publication
of brain to body mass ratio and encephalization quotient of North American White-tailed Deer (1.094)
from a subset of our adult male samples.
Introduction
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a neurodegenerative prion disease that increasingly
threatens wild cervid populations (DeVivo et al. 2017, Edmunds et al. 2016). In addition
to direct contact with infected animals, transmission of CWD has also been documented
through contact with environments contaminated with infected carcasses (Miller et al.
2004). As a result, many wildlife agencies employ cervid carcass transport and disposal
regulations aimed at reducing environmental contamination and anthropogenic spread of
the disease (Gillan and Mawdsley 2018). This approach was further supported by a recent
study that demonstrated oral exposure to only 100–300 nanograms (ng) of CWD-positive
brain material was sufficient to infect Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann (White-tailed
Deer) (Denkers et al. 2020). To our knowledge, a published reference does not exist for
brain mass in free-ranging, male White-tailed Deer. Such a reference would be helpful to
contextualize the amount of potential infectious CWD material in one deer head. Furthermore,
the brain to body mass ratio and encephalization quotient reported here may be of use
to future morphological or neurodegenerative research.
Methods
Between January 2022 and January 2023, adult male White-tailed Deer aged approximately
2.5 to 4.5 years, based on dentition and tooth wear, were opportunistically selected
for the study. Samples were collected from 17 hunting units across the state (Figure 1) and
included whole carcasses submitted for mortality investigation (n = 11) and heads from
1 North Dakota Game and Fish Department, Wildlife Health Lab, 3001 E. Main Ave. Bismarck, North
Dakota 58501 (USA). *Corresponding author (email: cbahnson@nd.gov).
Associate Editor: Sue Fairbanks, Oklahoma State University.
Prairie Naturalist
C. M. Wight and C. S. Bahnson
2025 No. 57
34
hunter-harvested animals voluntarily submitted for CWD surveillance conducted by the
North Dakota Game and Fish Department (NDGF) during the 16.5–day deer gun season in
November (n = 18). These hunting units were selected because no confirmed cases of CWD
had been detected as of January 2022. Carcasses collected for mortality investigation at the
NDGF Wildlife Health Lab (Bismarck, North Dakota, USA) consisted of adult, male Whitetailed
Deer found dead by members of the public (n = 9) or euthanized after appearing
moribund (n = 2). Cold chain was initiated as soon as possible following carcass collection
and was maintained below 4.45 ˚C throughout the storage period for each sample, which
did not exceed 14 days. Due to sub-freezing temperatures throughout much of the 2022 gun
season and the outdoor locations of sample collection sites, most samples were subjected to
at least one freeze-thaw cycle prior to processing.
All individuals were screened for CWD via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
testing of the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes at the Montana Veterinary Diagnostic
Laboratory (Bozeman, Montana, USA). CWD was not detected in any study deer, nor were
any deer presenting with gross lesions on the cerebrum, cerebellum, or brainstem included in
the study. Post-mortem investigations of several animals warranted submission of formalinfixed
tissues to diagnostic laboratories for histological evaluation by a pathologist (n = 4),
and when brain tissue was included (n = 2) no significant findings were noted in the pathology
case reports upon examination of the fixed cerebrum, cerebel lum, or brainstem.
Carcasses submitted to the Wildlife Health Lab for postmortem examination were
weighed intact using a digital hanging crane scale (Castron II Model 2THB) prior to necropsy.
Body weight of carcasses that had been scavenged in any capacity was not measured.
All major organs were examined grossly for lesions and other abnormalities, including the
brain. To extract the brain, skulls were bisected with a cleaver and mallet. Cranial nerves
were detached at the point of entry into the cranial cavity, and the brainstem was severed
at the point of exit from the foramen magnum. The cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem
Figure 1. Deer hunting units of North Dakota. Units from which animals in this study were utilized
are pictured in light grey, and units with previously confirmed detections of CWD are pictured in dark
grey. No CWD-positive units were sampled for the purposes of this study. One sample was collected
from units 2G, 2G1, 2J1, 2K1, 2K2, 3A3, 3F1, 4A, and 4B; two samples were collected from 2B, 2F2,
and 2J2; three samples were collected from 2C, 2H, and 3A4; and four samples were collected from 2I.
Prairie Naturalist
C. M. Wight and C. S. Bahnson
2025 No. 57
35
were removed from the skull, placed in a tared container, and weighed in grams (g) using an
electronic balance (Brecknell, Model 311). Brain weights were compared between hunterharvested
deer and mortality investigations using the Mann-Whitney test. The mean and
95% confidence intervals were calculated for brain and body weights. For animals in which
body weights were also recorded, an encephalization quotient (EQ) was calculated by using
the following established formula: brain mass/0.12(body mass) 0.66 (Jerison 1973).
Results
Morphometric data were collected from 29 adult, male White-tailed Deer between
January 2022 and January 2023 (Table 1). Brain mass was recorded for 29 individuals, and
body weight was recorded for nine of those individuals. Brain mass averaged 182.7 g (n =
29; 95% Confidence Interval = 177.2–188.2). There was no statistical difference between
mean brain masses from hunter-harvested deer versus mortality investigations (Mann-
Whitney U = 74, n1 = 18, n2 = 11, P = 0.271).
Body weight averaged 57.9 kg, with a range of 41–78 kg (n = 9; 95% Confidence Interval
= 50.7–65.2). The ratio of brain to body mass calculated for these nine individuals
averaged 1:330, with a range of 1:222.8–1:500. The mean brain and body mass values
corresponded to EQ of 1.094.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to fill a gap in the literature while also yielding information
necessary to better understand CWD transmission risk. Denkers et al. (2020) demonstrated
that 100–300 ng of CWD-contaminated brain homogenate was sufficient to infect
White-tailed Deer in an experimental setting. This trace amount may be difficult to conceptualize
for managers and policymakers who are charged with developing CWD-mitigating
strategies that are both reasonable and effective. While caution must be used to avoid overinterpretation,
findings from Denkers et al. (2020), paired with an average brain mass of
182.7 g reported herein, suggest that the number of infectious doses within the brain of a
CWD-infected animal could number in the hundreds of millions.
Numerous caveats must be considered when extrapolating these implications. For example,
the concentration of prions in brain material will vary anatomically and between
Table 1. Mean brain weight, body weight, and brain: body mass ratio of selected adult, male Whitetailed
Deer collected in North Dakota from January 2022 to Janu ary 2023.
Male White-tailed Deer aged 2.5–4.5 yrs
Measurement N Mean SD Min. Max.
Brain – fresh mass (g) 29 182.7 15.1 156.0 211.0
Gross body mass (kg) 9 57.9 11.1 41.0 78.0
Prairie Naturalist
C. M. Wight and C. S. Bahnson
2025 No. 57
36
animals and depends on where an animal falls within the course of disease (Spraker et al.
2002). The effect of freeze-thaw on moisture retention and weight measurements is unknown.
Regardless, this finding further illustrates the potential risk posed by movement
and improper disposal of carcasses, both of which may serve as anthropogenic mechanisms
that spread disease to novel areas.
Prions persist on the landscape for extended periods of time (Miller et al. 2004, Georgsson
et al. 2006), compounding the risk posed by such actions. Following human-caused
movement, scattering of carcass parts by scavengers can further exacerbate the contamination
of previously CWD-free landscapes (Jennelle et al. 2009, VerCauteren et al. 2012). The
brain, spinal column, and lymph nodes are classified as “high-risk” carcass parts and are
of particular concern due to patterns in prion accumulation throughout disease progression
(Fox et al. 2006). Regulating the transportation or improper disposal of high-risk carcass
parts from hunter-harvested animals is an important tool wildlife managers should utilize to
reduce CWD introduction and transmission risk (Gillan and Mawds ley 2018).
Morphometrics inform the study of wildlife species by providing quantitative values that
may distinguish between normal and abnormal condition of whole animals or major organs.
Past studies have reported mean brain masses of 197.7 g (± 19 g) for adult free-ranging
Odocoilus hemionus Rafinesque (Mule Deer) from northcentral Colorado and 159.0 g (±
8 g) for adult, female White-tailed Deer bred and raised in captivity in South Dakota (Anderson
et al. 1974, Berheim et al. 2019). Our comparable finding of 182.7 g for adult male
White-tailed Deer is otherwise absent from current literature, to the best of our knowledge.
This information may be of use for future morphological or neur odegenerative research.
Brain to body mass ratio can contextualize encephalization among species. Our value
of 1:330, the first available reference for this metric in White-tailed Deer, can be utilized
for comparative morphology among species (Jerison 1973). In contrast, the encephalization
quotient (EQ) accounts for the scaling relationship between the brain and body mass and
is often used as a morphometric means of illustrating the relative intelligence of species
(Boddy et al. 2012). Although male-biased and based on averages from a small sample size,
this rough approximation of EQ provides marginal context for where White-tailed Deer fall
within numerous, well-documented EQ calculations for other spec ies.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration administered through North Dakota
Game and Fish Department (Study No. W-67-R).
Literature Cited
Anderson, A.E., D.E. Medin, and D.C. Bowden. 1974. Growth and morphometry of the carcass, selected
bones, organs, and glands of mule deer. Wildlife Monographs 39:3–122.
Berheim, E.H., J.A. Jenks, J.G. Lundgren, E.S. Michel, D.G. Grove, and W.F. Jensen. 2019. Effects
of neonicotinoid insecticides on physiology and reproductive characteristics of captive female and
fawn white-tailed deer. Scientific Reports 9:4534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40994-9
Boddy, A.M., M.R. McGowen, C.C. Sherwood, L.I. Grossman, M. Goodman, and D.E. Wildman.
2012. Comparative analysis of encephalization in mammals reveals relaxed constraints on anthropoid
primate and cetacean brain scaling. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25:981–994.
Denkers N.D., C.E. Hoover, K.A. Davenport, D.M. Henderson, E.E. McNulty, A.V. Nalls, and E.A.
Hoover. 2020. Very low oral exposure to prions of brain or saliva origin can transmit chronic wasting
disease. PloS One 15(8), e0237410.
Prairie Naturalist
C. M. Wight and C. S. Bahnson
2025 No. 57
37
DeVivo, M.T., D.R. Edmunds, M.J. Kauffman, B.A. Schumaker, J. Binfet, T.J. Kreeger, and T.E.
Cornish. 2017. Endemic chronic wasting disease causes mule deer population decline in Wyoming.
PloS One 12(10), e0186512.
Edmunds, D.R., M.J. Kauffman, B.A. Schumaker, F.G. Lindzey, W.E. Cook, T.J. Kreeger, and T.E.
Cornish. 2016. Chronic wasting disease drives population decline of white-tailed deer. PloS One
11(8), e0161127.
Fox, K.A., J.E. Jewell, E.S. Williams, and M.W. Miller. 2006. Patterns of PrPCWD accumulation
during the course of chronic wasting disease infection in orally inoculated mule deer (Odocoileus
hemionus). Journal of General Virology 87(11), 3451–3461.
Georgsson, G., S. Sigurdarson, and P. Brown. 2006. Infectious agent of sheep scrapie may persist in
the environment for at least 16 years. Journal of General Virology 87:3737–3740.
Gillin, C.M., and J.R. Mawdsley. (eds.). 2018. AFWA technical report on best management practices
for surveillance, management and control of chronic wasting disease. Association of Fish and
Wildlife Agencies, Washington, D. C., USA. 111 pp.
Jennelle, C.S., M.D. Samuel, C.A. Nolden, and E.A. Berkley. 2009. Deer carcass decomposition
and potential scavenger exposure to chronic wasting disease. The Journal of Wildlife Management
73:655–662.
Jerison H.J. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. Academic Press, New York, USA, 481 pp.
Miller M.W., E.S. Williams, N.T. Hobbs, and L.L. Wolfe. 2004. Environmental sources of prion transmission
in mule deer. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10:1003–1006.
Spraker T.R., R.R. Zink, B.A. Cummings, C.J. Sigurdson, M.W. Miller, and K.I. O’Rourke. 2002. Distribution
of protease-resistant prion protein and spongiform encephalopathy in free-ranging mule
deer (Odocoileus hemionus) with chronic wasting disease. Veterinary Pathology 39:546–556.
VerCauteren K.C., J.L. Pilon, P.B. Nash, G.E. Phillips, and J.W. Fisher. 2012. Prion remains infectious
after passage through digestive system of American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). PLoS One
7(10), e45774.