Record of an Urban Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) Outside of its Typical Geographic Range
Ann C. Swanson1, Alyssa Conn2,3, Judd J. Swanson1, and Daniel M. Brooks3*
1Office of Museum Research, 1502 Sawyer St., Suite 202, Houston, TX 77007. 2Katy Prairie Conservancy, 5615 Kirby Dr, Suite 867, Houston, TX 77005. 3Houston Museum of Natural Science, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, 5555 Hermann Park Drive, Houston, TX 77030-1799. *Corresponding author.
Urban Naturalist Notes, No. 4 (2022)
Abstract
We use video-trap events to study activity patterns of a Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) in an urban Houston neighborhood outside of its typical geographic range. Fifty video clips of an individual Ringtail were obtained from 10 September to 15 December, 2018, with 2 additional records during 2019. The Ringtail was active from 1800–0700 hrs (peaking 2100–0100 hrs), temporally overlapping with Black Rat (1900–0700 hrs) and Virginia Opossum (1900–0200 hrs). Evening sorties were > 4–6 hours, and the Ringtail was recorded at 4 sites total with 1.2 km between the furthest sites. Results are discussed and compared to current knowledge base, and Ringtail presence and abundance in the eastern half of Texas is also discussed.
Download Full-text pdf
Site by Bennett Web & Design Co.
Volume 9, 2022 Urban Naturalist Notes No. 4
Record of an
Urban Ringtail
(Bassariscus astutus)
Outside of its Typical
Geographic Range
Ann C. Swanson, Alyssa Conn,
Judd J. Swanson, and Daniel M. Brooks
Urban Naturalist
The Urban Naturalist (ISSN # 2328-8965) is published by the Eagle Hill Institute, PO Box 9, 59 Eagle Hill Road, Steuben, ME 04680-
0009. Phone 207-546-2821 Ext. 4, FAX 207-546-3042. E-mail: office@eaglehill.us. Webpage: http://www.eaglehill.us/urna. Copyright
© 2022, all rights reserved. Published on an article by article basis. Special issue proposals are welcome. The Urban Naturalist is
an open access journal. Authors: Submission guidelines are available at http://www.eaglehill.us/urna. Co-published journals: The
Northeastern Naturalist, Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Naturalist, and Eastern Paleontologist, each with a separate Board of
Editors. The Eagle Hill Institute is a tax exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation of the State of Maine (Federal ID # 010379899).
Board of Editors
Hal Brundage, Environmental Research and Consulting,
Inc, Lewes, DE, USA
Sabina Caula, Universidad de Carabobo, Naguanagua,
Venezuela
Sylvio Codella, Kean University, Union New Jersey, USA
Julie Craves, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn,
MI, USA
Ana Faggi, Universidad de Flores/CONICET, Buenos
Aires, Argentina
Leonie Fischer, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin,
Germany
Chad Johnson, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ,
USA
Sonja Knapp, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research–UFZ, Halle (Saale), Germany
David Krauss, City University of New York, New York,
NY, USA
Joerg-Henner Lotze, Eagle Hill Institute, Steuben, ME.
Publisher
Kristi MacDonald, Hudsonia, Bard College, Annandale-on-
Hudson, NY, USA
Tibor Magura, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
Brooke Maslo, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,
USA
Mike McKinney, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN,
USA. Journal Editor
Desirée Narango, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,
MA, USA
Zoltán Németh, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and
Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen,
Hungary
Joseph Rachlin, Lehman College, City University of New
York, New York, NY, USA
Travis Ryan, Center for Urban Ecology, Butler University,
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Michael Strohbach, Technische Universität Braunschweig,
Institute of Geoecology, Braunschweig, Germany
Katalin Szlavecz, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD, USA
Advisory Board
Myla Aronson, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,
USA
Mark McDonnell, Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria and
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Charles Nilon, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO,
USA
Dagmar Haase, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental
Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
Sarel Cilliers, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South
Africa
Maria Ignatieva, University of Western Australia, Perth,
Western Australia, Australia
♦ The Urban Naturalist is a peer-reviewed and
edited interdisciplinary natural history journal
with a global focus on urban areas (ISSN 2328-
8965 [online]).
♦ The journal features research articles, notes,
and research summaries on terrestrial, freshwater,
and marine organisms and their habitats.
♦ It offers article-by-article online publication
for prompt distribution to a global audience.
♦ It offers authors the option of publishing large
files such as data tables, and audio and video
clips as online supplemental files.
♦ Special issues - The Urban Naturalist welcomes
proposals for special issues that are based
on conference proceedings or on a series of invitational
articles. Special issue editors can rely
on the publisher’s years of experiences in efficiently
handling most details relating to the
publication of special issues.
♦ Indexing - The Urban Naturalist is a young
journal whose indexing at this time is by way of
author entries in Google Scholar and Researchgate.
Its indexing coverage is expected to become
comparable to that of the Institute's first 3 journals
(Northeastern Naturalist, Southeastern Naturalist,
and Journal of the North Atlantic). These 3
journals are included in full-text in BioOne.org
and JSTOR.org and are indexed in Web of Science
(clarivate.com) and EBSCO.com.
♦ The journal's staff is pleased to discuss ideas
for manuscripts and to assist during all stages of
manuscript preparation. The journal has a page
charge to help defray a portion of the costs of
publishing manuscripts. Instructions for Authors
are available online on the journal’s website
(http://www.eaglehill.us/urna).
♦ It is co-published with the Northeastern Naturalist,
Southeastern Naturalist, Caribbean Naturalist,
Eastern Paleontologist, Eastern Biologist,
and Journal of the North Atlantic.
♦ It is available online in full-text version on the
journal's website (http://www.eaglehill.us/urna).
Arrangements for inclusion in other databases
are being pursued.
Cover Photograph: Ringtail mount in the Farish Hall of Texas Wildlife at the Houston Museum of Natural
Science. Photograph © Dan Brooks.
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
1
2021
Record of an Urban Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) Outside of
its Typical Geographic Range
Ann C. Swanson1, Alyssa Conn2, 3, Judd J. Swanson1, and Daniel M. Brooks3*
Abstract - We use video-trap events to study activity patterns of a Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) in an
urban Houston neighborhood outside of its typical geographic range. Fifty video clips of an individual
Ringtail were obtained from 10 September to 15 December, 2018, with 2 additional records during
2019. The Ringtail was active from 1800–0700 hrs (peaking 2100–0100 hrs), temporally overlapping
with Black Rat (1900–0700 hrs) and Virginia Opossum (1900–0200 hrs). Evening sorties were > 4–6
hours, and the Ringtail was recorded at 4 sites total with 1.2 km between the furthest sites. Results
are discussed and compared to current knowledge base, and Ringtail presence and abundance in the
eastern half of Texas is also discussed.
Introduction. The study of urban wildlife provides a baseline of knowledge of wildlife
populations and communities that thrive in sub/urban areas by divulging the way these species
are able to adapt and thrive in urban environments outside of native ecosystems. These
studies lead to a better understanding and sustainability of urban ecosystems that harbor such
species by promoting biodiversity and the best ecologically functioning systems possible,
while fomenting positive associations between people and wildlife (HUWP 2021). Species
of urban wildlife can be generally separated into those that are totally reliant upon humans to
survive (synanthropic) and those that thrive in urban environments independent of humans
(Adams and Lindsay 2010). In the latter case, these include species that are ecologically flexible
enough to thrive in urban environments outside of nature (McCleery et al. 2014).
Bassariscus astutus Lichtenstein (Ringtail; Fig.1) is found in North America as far
north as Oregon and Colorado in the United States, then southward throughout Mexico
west of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Poglayen-Neuwall and Toweill 1988). In Texas,
this species is especially common in the western half of the state where it is abundant
throughout the Edwards Plateau, westward through the Trans-Pecos and the Big Bend
region (iNaturalist 2021, VertNet 2021). In contrast, the Ringtail is much less common in
the eastern half of Texas, where it is reported as virtually (iNaturalist 2021) to completely
(VertNet 2021) absent. Yet its status is met with confusion in the eastern half of the state,
since the authoritative source on Texas mammals only notes absolute presence or absence
in Texas counties, without commenting on variation in abundance among different regions
(Schmidly and Bradley 2016).
The natural history and biology of this species was exhaustively reviewed in Poglayen-
Neuwall and Toweill (1988). To summarize, Ringtails are medium-sized omnivorous
carnivores that live in xeric habitats often characterized with rocky outcrops, but more
recently have been found to live in a wider variety of habitats (iNaturalist 2021). They
compete with a variety of species with a similar niche, as they eat an assortment of foods
ranging from small vertebrates to invertebrates to fruits of different plants. They shelter
1Office of Museum Research, 1502 Sawyer St., Suite 202, Houston, TX 77007. 2Katy Prairie Conservancy,
5615 Kirby Dr, Suite 867, Houston, TX 77005. 3Houston Museum of Natural Science, Department
of Vertebrate Zoology, 5555 Hermann Park Drive, Houston, TX 77030-1799. *Corresponding
author: dbrooks@hmns.org.
Associate Editor: David Valenzuela-Galván, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM).
Vol. 9, 2022 URBAN NATURALIST NOTES N4:1–6
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
2
and rear young in adopted dens, have a variety of vocalizations, and the young bond closely
with the mother until weaned.
Herein, we use video-trap events to study an individual Ringtail in an urban Houston
neighborhood outlying its typical geographic range (i.e., west Texas). Aspects of chronology,
activity and movements are described and discussed in comparison to the current
knowledge base for this species. Additionally, Ringtail presence and abundance in the eastern
half of Texas is discussed.
Methods. JJS first observed the study subject on 12 August 2018 on his neighbor’s rooftop
(1400 blk. Harold St., Houston, Harris Co., TX), before the animal left the area on a power
line. A game camera (Browning, Dark Ops Pro XD, BTC-6PXD; Settings: video mode, 30
sec. capture delay, ultra 1080p @ 60fps quality, 20 sec. video length) was set up on 10 September
2018 at a height of 5.3 m so that the Ringtail could be captured on camera from 6 m
away (distance from where it was seen), permitting minimal invasion of natural behavior.
The camera captured video records of the Ringtail the first night it was set up, when we
began collecting video clips for this study. We assume that a single animal was involved
considering the rarity of Ringtails in this region, along with very consistent behaviors
nightly (see below).
Additional locations of the Ringtail were obtained using the NextDoor App, which permits
community communication of notable events within a specific neighborhood. In this case, the
Ringtail seen at various locations, vouchered with photographic evidence in some cases.
Results and Discussion. We recorded a total of 50 video events (clips <1 min, without
sound) of the Ringtail from 10 September–15 December 2018, with 2 additional records
during 2019 (9 January and 1 April). The Ringtail was actively traveling at a quick walk/
slow run in virtually all images.
The Ringtail was generally active at nighttime from 1800–0700 hrs, with strongest
activity peaks from 2100–0100 hrs (Fig. 2). There was some temporal overlap with Rattus
rattus Linnaeus (Black Rat; N = 8) intermittently from 1900–0700 hrs, and Didelphis
Figure 1. Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus)
A) camera-trap photo, and B) photo on
NextDoor App.
A)
B)
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
3
virginiana Linnaeus (Virginia Opossum; N = 7) from 1900–0200 hrs, with the Opossum
extending its activity to morning (0900 hrs; Fig. 2). Other species recorded (N = 1 each)
include Procyon lotor Linnaeus (Northern Raccoon), Otus asio Linnaeus (Screech Owl),
and Periplaneta americana Linnaeus (American Cockroach).
The daily activity route was unknown, but the Ringtail generally traveled west on a utility
line between 2100–0100 and then traveled east on the same utility wire at 0100–0700
hrs. This would suggest these evening sorties were generally at least 4–6 hours in duration.
We recorded the Ringtail at 3 other sites besides the main study site (Fig. 3). The straight-line
distance from the furthest site (6 April 2019) to the 3 sites in the same vicinity was 1.2 km.
Activity. Our study subject was encountered from late summer through mid-winter, as
well as once during spring in urban residential habitat. Ringtails living in association with
human dwellings have been noted before in regions such as Lakeway, Texas (Travis Co.; J.
Champeney, Austin, TX, 78734, pers. obs.), as well as other regions throughout its range
(Poglayen-Neuwall and Toweill 1988).
The study subject was active from 1800–0700 hrs, peaking from 2100–0100 hrs, which
corroborates the findings of others, being rarely active during daytime (c.f., Poglayen-
Neuwall and Toweill 1988). The diel cycle overlapped that of less frequently recorded Black
Rat and Virginia Opossum. Ringtails are known to predate Murid rodents (Ackerson and
Harveson 2006) but are direct competitors with other medium-sized mammalian omnivores,
including opossums (c.f., Poglayen-Neuwall and Toweill 1988). Although it remains possible
that the Ringtail in our study predated rats and competed with opossums, a latrine with
fecal pellets was not found to perform scat analysis to determine this.
Daily sorties were approximately 4–6 hrs; we are unable to find prior information on
daily travel duration, suggesting that this information is novel. Mean home ranges in Trans-
Pecos Texas varied seasonally 0.28–0.63 km2 (Ackerson and Harveson 2006), which is
comparable to our finding of a straight-line dispersal >1.2 km.
Ringtail status in the eastern half of Texas. Despite being recorded in many Texas counties
(Schmidly and Bradley 2016), Ringtails are much more abundant in the western half of the
state compared to the eastern half (Fig. 4), with the location of Austin being the approximate
Figure 2. Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) daily diel cycle with Virginia Opossum (Didelphis virginiana)
and Black Rat (Rattus rattus) in Montrose (Houston, Harris Co., Texas).
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
4
dividing line between east and west Texas. Moreover, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
(TPWD hereafter) furbearer spotlight records (1978–96) only recorded Ringtails from the
Trans-Pecos region (western Texas). Ringtails were completely absent from Piney woods and
Post Oak surveys in the eastern half of Texas (unpubl. data provided by J. Purvis, TPWD,
Austin, TX, 78744).
When our study was first initiated in 2018, the nearest cluster of records temporally
coinciding to our observation site were several localities around Austin (Travis Co.), ~235
km northwest (iNaturalist 2021). It is possible that our record represents a gradual eastward
expansion. Since the Ringtail reported herein was photo-trapped, more have been reported
in the region: on 27 April 2019 in Nada (Colorado County, Tx) ~100 km west and slightly
Figure 3. Sightings of Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) in Montrose neighborhood (Houston, Harris
Co., Texas).
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
5
south of our record in Houston, on 5 June 2020 in Galveston (Galveston County, Tx) ~75
km southeast, and on 19 February 2021 in Katy (Harris County, Tx) ~45 km west (iNaturalist
2021). These 3 photo-trap records, all within ~100 km of our site, represent virtually
the only recent records from the eastern half of the state (iNaturalist 2021). The reason for
the sudden appearance of Ringtails in this region may be related to the increased number of
camera-trap usage by the general public.
Corroborating the rarity of Ringtails from the eastern half of the state, annual TPWD
trapper data (1987–2002) from these 3 counties shows only 1 Ringtail trapped each in Harris
(1987) and Galveston (1995) counties, and 3 from Colorado county (1992–95) during this
15-year trapping period. Moreover, the same data from counties surrounding Harris county
indicates only 1 Ringtail trapped each in Brazoria (2001), Ft. Bend (1992), and Waller
(1987) counties, but none trapped in Chambers, Liberty, or Montgomery counties (TPWD,
Austin, TX, 78744 unpubl. data). In sum, Ringtails are uncommon in the eastern half of the
state compared to the western half, likely because the western half is more characteristic of
the xeric habitats they prefer. It is possible that urban habitat in east Texas is slowly simulating
the xeric, more open habitats of west Texas, and as this urban surface expands in east Texas,
it is gradually occupied by Ringtails.
Conclusion. Urban environments are increasingly important for small populations of
some wildlife species as natural habitat diminishes (Adams and Lindsay 2010). Large
colonies of Tadarida brasiliensis Geoffroy (Free-tailed Bats), Northern Raccoons, Virginia
Opossums, and a variety of raptors are well established in the Montrose region of Houston
as an example (c.f., Winston et al. 2017; results herein). Other rarer urban wildlife in this
particular area include Dasypus novemcinctus Linnaeus (Nine-banded Armadillo) and Bubo
virginianus Gmelin (Great-horned Owl; DMB, unpubl. data), and more recently the Ringtail
described herein. As native habitat continues to be impacted over future decades, urban
habitats may serve as important reservoirs for displaced and remnant wildlife populations.
Figure 4. Numbers of Ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) trapped in west and east Texas, as reported by
fur trappers (1986–2002) to TPWD (unpubl. data provided by J. Purvis, TPWD, Austin, TX, 78744).
Urban Naturalist Notes
A.C. Swanson et. al.
Vol. 9, 2022 N4:1–6
6
Acknowledgements
Kind thanks to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department staff Jon Purvis and Chris Maldonado for providing
and facilitating the data used to create Figure 4, and other data and information that helped bolster
this manuscript. We are indebted to David Valenzuela-Galván, David Schmidly, Frank Yancey, and
Amy Dunham for their helpful comments on former drafts of this manuscript.
Literature Cited
Ackerson, B.K., and L.A. Harveson. 2006. Characteristics of a ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) population
in Trans Pecos, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 58:169–184.
Adams, C.E., and K.J. Lindsay. 2010. Urban Wildlife Management, Second edition. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL, USA. 403 pp.
HUWP. 2021. Houston Urban Wildlife Project. Available online at http://www.hmns.org/huwp. Accessed
24 August 2021.
iNaturalist. 2021. Ringtails (Genus Bassariscus). Available online at https://www.inaturalist.org/
taxa/41674-Bassariscus. Accessed 1 June 2021.
McCleery, R.A., C.E. Moorman, and M. N. Peterson. 2014. Urban Wildlife Conservation: Theory and
Practice. Springer, New York, NY, USA. 420 pp.
Poglayen-Neuwall, I., and D.E. Toweill. 1988. Bassariscus astutus. ASM Mammalian Species
327:1–8.
Schmidly, D.J., and R.D. Bradley. 2016. The Mammals of Texas, Seventh edition. University of Texas
Press, Austin, TX, USA. 720 pp.
VertNet. 2021. Bassariscus astutus. Available online at http://portal.vertnet.org/search?q=specificepit
het:astutus+genus:Bassariscus+stateprovince:%22Texas%22. Accessed 1 June 2021.
Winston, K.M., J.R. Winston, and D.M. Brooks. 2017. Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsonii) hunting
behavior at an urban population of Mexican Free-tailed Bats (Tadarida mexicanus). Pp. 27–31, In
D. M. Brooks (Ed.). Half a Century of Ornithology in Texas: the Legacy of Dr. Keith Arnold. Miscellaneous
Publication of the Houston Museum of Natural Science, Number 7, Houston. 158 pp.