nabr masthead
JNABR Home Staff & Editors For Readers For Authors

Bats and Wind Turbines: Adding Ecological Context to the Olfaction Hypothesis

Jeff Clerc1,*, Elizabeth Rogers2, Nathan Fuller3, Kristin Jonasson4, Laura Dempsey1, Alyson F. Brokaw5, and Theodore J. Weller6

1National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401. 2Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003. 3US Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA 01035. 4209 Cindy Lane, Brandon, FL 33510. 5Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18085. 6USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Arcata, CA 95521.*Corresponding author.

Journal of North American Bat Research Notes, Volume 3 (2025):N1–N7

Abstract
Several hypotheses attempt to explain why bats collide with wind turbines. One recent hypothesis is that collisions result from bats scent marking turbines and that scent-marked turbines produce odor plumes that attract bats. This olfaction hypothesis is intriguing, but currently lacks the ecological context required to assess its plausibility. To provide context, we review when we expect Northern Hoary Bats and Mexican Free-tailed Bats to scent mark under natural conditions, and determine if our findings align with observations of bats interacting with wind turbines. We then consider the plausibility of scent-marked turbines creating odor plumes that attract bats. We conclude that it is unlikely that bats scent mark turbines intentionally in mid-flight or are attracted to scent markings on turbines.

pdf iconDownload Full-text pdf (Open access)

 

 



Access Journal Content

Open access browsing of all JNABR content.

Articles

Notes

Special Issues

 

submit

 

subscribe

 

Bat Research News Archives