Furs, Fish, and Ivory: Medieval Norsemen at the Arctic Fringe
Christian Keller*
Abstract - Why did the Norse Icelanders colonize Greenland in the late tenth century A.D., and why did they explore the
coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland? Was it a desperate search for farmland at the margins of the known world, or was
it a market-driven economic strategy applied to sub-arctic territory? To address these questions, the author gives a brief introduction
to the Norse expansion and economic strategies in three regions: the Sami territory in Northern Scandinavia, the
Finnish and Russian territories east of Scandinavia, and Greenland and Labrador in the western North Atlantic. The purpose
of the expansion north and east of Scandinavia was to buy or extort furs from the hunter-gatherer communities. This strategy
is unthinkable without a European and even Middle Eastern demand for furs, and must generally be seen as market-driven.
The author suggests that the Norse explorations of Labrador and the colonization of Greenland was equally market driven,
with walrus tusks as the most successful export commodity. In the twelfth century, the Norse economy transformed from a
Viking Period high-status trade with luxury articles to a low-status bulk trade with foodstuffs. Stockfish from the north was
exchanged for grain from the south. Norwegian stockfish export started ca. 1100 A.D., while Iceland commenced almost a
century later. This shift caused structural changes to both Norwegian and Icelandic economies, and must also have affected
the Norse Greenland economy. The author recommends that the regional and national investigations that have dominated
the research be supplemented with North European studies of the Viking and Medieval cash and trade economies, spanning
from acquisition to consumption.
*IKOS (Institute of Culture and Oriental Languages), University of Oslo, PO Box 1010, Blindern, NO 0315 Oslo, Norway;
christian.keller@ikos.uio.no.
Introduction
Why did the Norse inhabitants of Iceland go to
Greenland to set up a colony towards the end of the
tenth century AD? And why were the Norse Greenland
colonies abandoned 400 years later?
Nineteenth-century Danish and Icelandic scholars
blamed the abandonment on the Norwegian government,
by pointing to the submission of Iceland and
Greenland to King Hákon Hákonsson 1262–63 A.D.,
and the royal Norwegian trade monopoly (first argued
in 1838 in GHM I:VI). The latter was an embargo on
all foreign trade North and West of Bergen, originally
introduced to harness the influx of English and
Hanseatic traders (Helle 1982:484–485, 731, 806;
Stefánsson 1986:81), and extended by later regents.
Modern authors have tended to see the failure
of the Norse Greenlanders as evidence that they did
not understand the nature of their new homeland,
that they overreached ecologically, and succumbed
when the climatic conditions turned against them.
In contrast, the Inuit hunters are often promoted as
the true masters of the Arctic environment (Diamond
2004:212–213, 219–221, 246–247, 261–276), surviving
the climatic fluctuations which (some argue)
brought the Norse to their knees.
In line with the Icelandic written sources from
the Middle Ages, scholars have normally assumed
that the Norse settled in Greenland to live from
pastoral farming, although they were obviously prepared
to replenish their supplies with wild resources
such as birds, fish, seals, and caribou. In addition,
the walrus hunts up north provided the Greenlanders
with ivory for export, raising the cash needed to
purchase certain commodities from Europe.
This paper takes a totally different view of the
raison d’être of the Norse Greenland colonies.
To modern people, the idea of leaving Iceland
to become a farmer in Greenland around 1000 A.D.
borders on the insane. It also defies logic: Iceland
was first settled from the 870s A.D., and the island
could hardly have been overpopulated as early as
1000 A.D.
More likely, the colonization of Greenland was
economically motivated; at the time, the Norse in
northern Norway had already expanded into Sami
territory, and had performed exploratory journeys
to the White Sea for pelts and walrus ivory (Fig. 1).
The period for chiefly, and later royal, export of furs
from Norway to the European market has traditionally
been considered to span 300 years, from the
late 800s to the early 1200s A.D. (KLNM [Nordic
Encyclopedia for the Middle Ages] vol.15:529), but
in fact and as detailed below, the industry kept going
into the seventeenth century.
Before 800 A.D., traders from eastern Sweden
had entered the Gulf of Finland and the river Neva
to plug into the trade-networks of the Russian river
systems. Both the Norwegian and Swedish traders
were extorting tribute in furs from the Sami
and Finnish-speaking hunter-gatherers. What was
initially a peaceful trade developed during the Viking
Period into a typical coercion-extortion cycle
(for definition, see Bagge 1989, with reference to
Finer 1975). This transformation must have been
a response to an increasing demand for furs on the
European luxury market.
The colonization of Greenland, and the exploratory
journeys down the coast of Labrador and New-
2010 Journal of the North Atlantic 3:1–23
2 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
foundland (Ingstad, A.S. 1977; Ingstad, H. 1985),
must have had similar purposes: to locate sources for
luxury items that could be exported to the European
market. The Greenland input to the European luxury
trade was obviously the walrus ivory from the Disko
Bay area; however, we do not know whether furs
from Greenland and Labrador were traded as well.
Compared to walrus ivory, furs have a low archaeological
visibility.
Around 1100 A.D., and only a century after the
voyages to Newfoundland, the economic systems
in Scandinavia transformed, and Norway started to
export huge amounts of dried cod—stockfish—to
the European market (Amundsen 2004; Amundsen
et al 2005; KLNM vol. 4:366–370; Krivigorskaya
et al. 2005a, 2005b; Nielsen 2010; Perdikaris and
McGovern 2007, 2008a, 2008b). In Iceland, stockfish was produced from very early on for home
consumption and distribution, as is clear from
the zoo-archaeological evidence from the sites of
Sveigakot, Hrísheimar, Hofstaðir, and Selhagi, all
in the Mývatn region, 50–60 km from the coast
(Amundsen et al. 2005, McGovern 2009:226–236,
Perdikaris et al. 2004a, Vésteinsson et al. 2002).
Zoo-archaeological analyses also confirm that Iceland
started commercial export of stockfish from the
West Fjords to Europe ca. 1200 A.D. (Edvardsson
and McGovern 2005, Edvardsson et al. 2004; but see
Thór 2009:323). With this endeavor, the number of
European ships in the West Atlantic increased.
The climatic instability from the fourteenth century
brought hardships to both Icelandic and Greenlandic
farming, but even more so, it affected the voyages
to the northern hunting grounds in Disko Bay in
Greenland; ice-core analyses suggest increased ice
cover in the Strait of Davis (Dugmore et. al. 2006,
2009). Drift-ice and/or fixed sea ice may simply
have barred access to the walrus-hunting grounds,
which may have had a devastating effect upon the
export economy.
The present work is an attempt to show the Norse
Greenland colonies, and their fate, in a larger context
than that of pastoral farmers trying to survive
in a country less than suited for animal husbandry.
Figure 1. The Norse settlement areas in the Viking and Early Middle Ages (in black). Neighboring hunter-gatherers and
potential trading partners are named in call-outs, their settled areas suggested by horizontal hatching. Known Norse voyages
are indicated. (Based on Fitzhugh and Ward 2000:198, and Hansen and Olsen 2004:58, 81, 137.)
2010 C. Keller 3
The walrus hunt in northwest Greenland is seen as
a market-driven activity, and so is the eleventhcentury
exploration of the Canadian east coast.
Early Iceland is not seen as a simple, selfsupplied
agricultural community which could only
attract some imports by exporting vaðmál (woolen
cloth). It is also seen as a nation dependent on
marine resources, with an entrepreneurial desire
to access the Arctic to export furs and ivory to the
European (and Oriental) luxury markets. The colonization
of Greenland was just another logical step
in this strategy.
The Norse in Iceland and Greenland
Iceland was settled in the late ninth century
A.D. by Norse immigrants, either directly from the
Norwegian west coast, or indirectly from the Norse
areas in Ireland and Scotland (Sawyer 2000). This
colonization was part of a larger expansion from
Scandinavia during the Viking and Middle Ages.
The Norse immigrants brought with them the
traditional European host of domestic plants and
animals, and established farms based on pastoral
farming. Cereal production was tried in Iceland, but
apparently never became much of a success. Wild
resources, such as berries, salt- and freshwater fish,
marine mammals (including whales), eggs, and birds
were harvested from the start.
Once the initial pioneering was over, the Icelanders
must have enjoyed a comfortable subsistence
economy. Iceland itself did not, however, have
much in terms of export-friendly commodities (but
see Perdikaris et al. 2001). Without goods to attract
traders from abroad, Iceland would suffer a degree
of isolation.
Medieval written records tell that a century after
the original landnám1, a small fleet of ships left Iceland
to set up a colony on the west coast of Greenland2,
establishing a thriving community which at
some point comprised maybe 2000–3000 souls,
a cathedral at Garðar3, and quite a few churches
(Gjerland and Keller, in press; Gulløv 2004; Krogh
1982; Nørlund 1936).
The seemingly tragic disappearance of the Norse
Greenlanders some 400 years later has been a recurring
mystery in the literature, recently discussed in
an international perspective (Diamond 2004:178–
276; but see Gulløv 2004; McAnany and Yoffee
2010; Seaver 1996, 2010).
Why were the Greenland colonies established
in the first place? Did the settlers seriously believe
that Greenland would offer them a better life as pastoral
farmers and part-time hunters than would, for
instance, Iceland? The sagas describing the venture
seem to indicate so, but they were written centuries
after the colonization and are of limited accuracy.
Some sources mention the elusive Norðrsetur, the
northern hunting grounds. With reasonable certainty,
this has been identified with the Disko Bay area with
its walrus populations (Gulløv 2004:211–213, but
see McGovern 1985).
Many of the theories concerning the collapse of the
Norse Greenland society in the fourteenth to fifteenth
centuries take for granted that the primary cause was
the climatic deterioration of the Little Ice Age (Dugmore
et al. 2006, 2009), and that it was the subsistence
economy that suffered. Indeed, an increased climatic
instability seems to have occurred, although the precise
consequences for southwest Greenland are diffi-
cult to estimate. It is, however, not hard to imagine that
cattle-breeding and sheep-farming would have been
vulnerable to increased cold. This hardship may well
have occurred, but there are other aspects to consider.
A useful approach is to look at Iceland and Greenland
as two economically interdependent societies.
To put it simply: prior to 1200 A.D., Iceland had a
sufficient subsistence economy but an insufficient export
economy. In the pastoral economy, sheep yielded
vaðmál, a labor-intensive export commodity for
which Iceland was famous (KLNM vol.19:409–412,
Þorláksson 1991). Greenland’s subsistence economy
must have been considerably more marginal than
Iceland’s, but with better access to seals than fish. Its
access to walrus tusks provided a potential for a viable
export economy. Cooperation between the two
countries would make perfect sense. The colonization
of Greenland may therefore be seen as an attempt by
the Icelanders to establish an export economy based
on walrus ivory and perhaps furs from the Greenland
west coast. We do know that the walrus ivory
was keenly sought, and that it fetched high prices on
the European market (Gaborit-Chopin 1978; Goldschmidt
1914–1926; Gulløv 2004:277–278; Liebgott
1985; McGovern 1992; Pirenne 1939; Roesdahl
1995, 2000, 2005; Sawyer 1987; Sawyer and Sawyer
1993:144, 153; Seaver 1996:30–31, 48, 57; Seaver
2009 [a comment on Roesdahl 1995]; Tegengren
1962). Considering the large number of sheep in the
Norse Greenland economy, it is quite possible that
vaðmál was also exported from there.
In 1327 A.D., a load of walrus tusks from Greenland
was sold in Bergen (Munch 1864:45). This payment
was the Peter’s Pence and the six-years’ tithe,
a crusade tax which eventually helped finance King
Magnus Eiriksson’s 1340s crusade against Novgorod
(Christiansen 1997:189–195). The load of tusks may
be estimated to 802 kg, suggesting ca. 520 tusks representing
some 260 animals (McGovern 1985 writes
668 kg based on Gad 1967:168, but Gad probably
used an incorrect weigh-unit; see Keller 1989:278
with reference to Steinnes 1936/1982:29).
According to Kåre Lunden (1978:95), Norwegian
prices from 1306–1337 A.D. were quite stable.
4 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Recalculated to early fourteenth century Norwegian
currency, the value of the tusks can be estimated to
260 marks of burnt silver (Keller 1989:279), basically
one mark per pair of tusks, each equaling the
value of 3 cows. This amount does not sound like
much, but the computed value of the 520 tusks from
1327 A.D. runs into something like 780 cow equivalents,
or nearly 60 metric tons of stockfish.
To put this in a perspective: after the Norwegian
king took over Iceland and Greenland in the 1260s,
each Icelandic farmer was to pay an annual tax of 20
ells of vaðmál. The Faroes payed a similar tax, and
Greenland also promised to do so, but the details
concerning the Greenland payments are not preserved.
Half was going to the King, and half to the
local officials. A record from 1311 A.D. shows that
a total of 3800 Icelandic farmers paid their 20 ells
of vaðmál. The value that went to the king has been
estimated to 317.5 cow equivalents, making the total
payment twice as much, i.e., 635 cow equivalents
(from Helle 2005:13, with reference to Stefánsson
1993:312, and Helle 1974:198–199). Thus, the value
of the Greenland tusks from 1327 A.D. (representing
the six years’ tithe) was worth more than the annual
tax from nearly four thousand Icelandic farmers4.
A walrus weighs 1–2 metric tons. In addition to
its valuable skin, which was used for rope, an animal
would yield 2–5 barrels of blubber (oil) (Sivertsen
1980:346), an essential source of light in the Greenlandic
winter.
A small coaster such as the Danish Viking ship
Skuldelev 3 had a cargo capacity of 4.5–5 metric
tons. Being a light, 14-meter-long vessel, it was
mainly driven by sail, but up to 7 oars could be used.
Built in the 1040s A.D., it was typical for a class
of small coastal traders that were in use from the
mid-tenth to the mid-twelfth centuries (Christensen
2000:93; Crumlin-Pedersen and Olsen 2002:195–
243, in particular 240–241)5. What types of vessels
were used to get to Norðursetur is not known, although
six-oared boats are mentioned.
Although written records of walrus ivory export
are few and far between, the archaeological evidence
for ivory extraction is plentiful.
Perdikaris and McGovern wrote (2008a): “The
Norðursetur hunters seem to have transported only
limited portions of the walrus back to the home
farms, as walrus bone finds from both the Western
and Eastern settlement areas are made up almost
entirely of fragments of the maxilla from around the
deep-rooted tusks.”
The walrus ivory does, in other words, have a
better archaeological visibility than blubber and
furs, despite the fact that the tusks themselves were
never found on any Norse sites. The maxillary chips
are the signatures of a large tusk production.
It is hardly accidental that the Norse houses
at L’Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland were
erected within the same generation as the initial
settlements in Greenland. It is tempting to see these
activities as expressions of the same efforts, i.e., to
establish a supply of exotic commodities for export
to Europe, from the edge of the Arctic world. Was
this a unique historic situation, or did the Icelanders
emulate economic strategies known from other
parts of the Norse culture area, i.e., north and east of
Scandinavia?
Information from an eleventh-century source
suggests that the Icelanders at the time were actively
exploring new land: an agreement between the
Icelanders and Norwegian King Ólafr Haraldsson
(died 1030 A.D.) is recorded in a version which
Helgi Þorláksson suggests might stem from the
1080s A.D. (Þorláksson 1991, 2001:85). It concerns
the Icelanders’ duty to pay tax on arrival in Norway,
“unless they were going to Greenland [i.e., from
Iceland] or were looking for new land, or drifted
from Iceland” [literally: from taking ships between
harbors in Iceland]. “Ef þeir menn verða sæhafa i
noreg er vart hafa til græn landz eða fara í landa
leitan. eða slitr þa út fra islandi þa er þeir vilde
færa scip sin mille hafna.” (Published in Bagge et
al. 1973:13–15, Norwegian translation 12–14, my
underlining.) The agreement may be contemporary
with the Norse ruins at l’Anse aux Meadows in
Newfoundland, or slightly younger.
There seems to be no doubt that the Icelanders
of the eleventh century were active explorers. Why?
As mentioned, the Scandinavian Norse explored
the land of the Sami, lying north and east of their
own land. This activity implied interaction with the
indigenous populations, i.e., trade, and extortion of
tribute. To what extent the Icelanders took a similar
approach to the natives of the western Atlantic is not
known, but they would have had to be careful. For
the Norse explorers, it would have been potentially
dangerous to approach a group of Native Americans
on their own territory.
A way to minimize the risk of unfriendly encounters
is silent trade: The Islamic scholar Abu Hamid
visited Bulgar 1135–36 A.D., and described how
the merchants “bring goods with them, and each
merchant puts his property down in a separate place,
makes his sign on it and goes away. Then after a while
they return and find goods that are needed in their
country. And each man finds some of these things near
his own goods; if he agrees [to the exchange], then he
takes them; if not, he gathers his own things and leaves
the others and no exchange takes place. And they do
not know from whom they are buying these goods.”
(Martin 1986:22 and notes, 176–177. She quotes a
similar description from the 1320s, p. 29).
2010 C. Keller 5
The Sami/Norse Fur Trade
The Norse colonization of Greenland should be
seen as the ultimate extent of the Norse colonization
of the North Atlantic. While the settlements
further east and south in the Atlantic were motivated
by the opportunities for fishing and pastoral
farming, the push into the Greenland and Canadian
Arctic should be compared to the Norse expansion
into the northern parts of Scandinavia (i.e., the
northern parts of present-day Sweden and Norway),
and to the east (into present-day Finland and the
northern parts of European Russia). Way before
the Viking Period, these areas were inhabited by
Sami- and Finnish-speaking hunter-gatherers.
The Iron Age Norse lived in hierarchic farming
societies, and in the Viking Period their settlements
stretched as far north as the present-day town of
Harstad, north of the Lofoten and Ofoten archipelagos.
This northern settlement limit has often been
regarded as the ecologically determined agricultural
boundary, i.e., it coincided with the northern limit for
cereal cultivation. More and more, it is also being regarded
as the old ethnic boundary between the Norse
and the Sami (Hansen and Olsen 2004:77–82, with
special reference to Schanche 1986; but see Hansen
1990 for an extensive discussion of the issue). Cereal
production was not vital to the Norse farmers, except
for production of beer for ritual (?) purposes (KLNM
vol. 20:689–698). Pastoral farming (Icelandic style)
was probably common in most of Hålogaland (i.e.,
the coast north of Trøndelag6) and sufficient to sustain
the sedentary farming lifestyle far outside the climatic
limits for cereal cultivation.
The Sami, mentioned in Medieval sources as
Finns or Scriðfinnas, were mainly hunter-gatherers
and reindeer pastoralists. Their land was called
Finnmọrk, and during the ninth and tenth centuries,
a profitable trade between the Sami and their
neighbors developed from older, more symmetric
exchange systems. The Sami provided furs to the
Scandinavian Norse, and to peoples of the Baltic,
Karelia, and northwest Russia (Hansen and Olsen
2004:136–139).
Another popular trade item was blubber oil,
produced in stone-lined pits in Sami territory. The
production of this commodity dropped during the
eleventh century (loc. cit., with reference to Henriksen
1995:90–93), possibly substituted by cod liver oil
from the Lofoten fisheries. Incidentally, the Old Norse
word lýsi means oil, and is related to ljós—light.
The Norse chief Ohthere, who visited King Alfred’s
court in Wessex some time at the end of the
ninth century, told the king that he lived in Hålogaland,
and furthest north of all Norwegians. He described
the Finns (Sami), and a journey he had taken
to the north and east (around the Kola Peninsula to
the White Sea), to a people he called the Beormas
(Biarmas) (Lund 1984) (Fig. 2). This tale is consistent
with the descriptions of Biarmaland in later
sources7.
Modern research suggests that the Biarmas were a
Baltic-Finnish tribe, either the Veps or the Ves. They
might be among the tribes called Čuds or Tsjuds (i.e.,
“stranger” in pre-Slavonic) by the Novgorodians
(Hansen and Olsen 2004:159, Sawyer 1987:121,
Vilkuna in KLNM I: 647–651, while Mervi Koskela
Vasaru [2003] suggests a Baltic Finnish group of
Häme origin). Then Ohthere’s account goes on: “His
main reason for going there, apart from exploring
the land, was for the walruses, because they have
very fine ivory in their tusks—they brought some of
these tusks to the king—and their hide is very good
for ship-ropes.” (Lund 1984:19–20).
He also described how the Finns (Sami) paid
him tribute in marten skin, reindeer pelts, bear-skin,
otter-skin, feathers, whale-bone (probably walrus
ivory), and ship-ropes (i.e., from walrus hide) (loc.
cit.). Voyages to Biarmaland are often described in
the medieval sources. In the Saga of The Sons of
Eiríkr (i.e., the sons of Eiríkr Bloodaxe, who ruled
Norway 959–974 A.D.), Snorri Sturlusson describes
King Haralðr’s voyage to Biarmaland and a battle
at the Dvina estuary, i.e., at the location of presentday
Archangel on the eastern shore of the White Sea
(Hollander 1999:140). Snorri explains Haralðr’s
nickname Gráfeldr—a literary translation is difficult: grey fleece, or a coat made from grey pelts,
perhaps even squirrel skins—with an anecdote that
Haralðr got a sheepskin cloak from an Icelandic
merchant (Hollander 1999:136, for translation see
Fritzner 1954 vol. I:401). Scholars have suggested
the nickname rather reflected Haralðr’s interest in
the northeastern fur trade.
According to Lars Ivar Hansen and Bjørnar
Olsen, the last Biarmaland expedition took place
in 1222 A.D., but the King’s representative Gissur
Galle undertook an expedition in 1310–11 A.D.
to extort tribute from the Sami (Hansen and Olsen
2004:154, for details op. cit.:219, with reference to
Bratrein 2001:1). However, as late as in 1611 A.D.,
the Dano-Norwegian King Christian IV triggered the
Kalmar War because Sweden wanted to transform
the old rights (to tax the Sami) to territorial claims
in present-day Finnmark.
During the Viking and Middle Ages, the Sami
and other peoples on the supply-side of the furtrade
became subject to harsh and violent extortion
of “tax”, i.e., tribute, often from three countries at
the same time. The conversion of the neighboring
Norse and Karelian societies to Christianity during
the tenth and eleventh centuries provided an excuse
for a ruthless exploitation of the pagan Sami. The
development of the Scandinavian kingdoms with
6 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
their central authorities had a similar effect, as the
old chieftains along the borders were replaced by
representatives of the king, who were given the royal
privilege of Finnkaup, i.e., the right to trade with the
Finns/Sami. This change increased the asymmetric
relationship with the Sami as the weaker party,
which again propelled an extremely profitable furtrade
based on extortion, first by the Scandinavian
Norse, and later by the Karelians, with Novgorod
as the hub of the High and Late Medieval fur trade
(Birnbaum 1996, Brisbane 1992, Brisbane and
Gaimster 2001, Christiansen 1997, Martin 1986).
The Sami/Norse fur trade of the ninth to the
twelfth centuries, with products meant for the European
market, can be classified as belonging to the
Viking Period type of trade. Typical for this system
was a long-distance trade with expensive commodities,
run by and for the upper echelons of society.
The suggestion promoted here initially is that
when the Norse people of Iceland decided to colonize
southwest Greenland sometime around 1000 A.D., it
was not due to a shortage of farmland in Iceland, but
in order to establish base-camps for the Norðrsetur
cash hunts. Whether they intended to actively emulate
the Sami/Norse fur trade and extortion racket is
hard to tell, but in the delivery end, they eventually
plugged into the same networks and markets in Europe
and the Middle East.
The Greenland Norse collected walrus ivory in the
Disko area. Whether they ever traded with or extorted
walrus ivory and/or furs from the pagan Skrælings
(i.e., the Dorset and/or later Thule cultures) is not
known (but see Seaver 1996:37–38). Extortion would
not have been beyond them, with potentially dangerous
and unknown consequences, but there were
peaceful alternatives, provided they had something to
give the Skrælings in return, such as iron.
Furs are hard to track archaeologically, and are
only mentioned briefly in a thirteenth century (?)
written record: in the Saga of the Greenlanders, the
Skrælings of Vinland come to trade furs—grávara,
safvali (squirrel and sable), and other pelts (The
Complete Sagas I:28). These furs were not native
to Iceland or Greenland, but were well-known commodities
on the Scandinavian and European markets,
originating from the Sami territories and from
the Novgorod fur trade, as far back as the eleventh
century (Martin 1986:52). The skins (or at least their
names) must have been known to Norse traders, and
apparently also to the saga scribes in Iceland.
It is quite likely that the Norse exploration of
Greenland and eastern Canada were attempts to find
furs and other exotic commodities that could be sold
on the European market. The radiocarbon dates from
L’Anse aux Meadows from ca. 1000–1030 A.D.
(Nydal 1977), suggest the houses were contemporary
with the initial settlement of Greenland, and the
Icelanders’ agreement with King Ólafr Haraldsson
about exploration dates from about the same time.
Perhaps they were even looking for people from
whom they could collect tribute?
In Íslendingabók (the Book of Icelanders from
ca. 1130 A.D.) (Benediktsson 1986b), Ári fróði suggests
that the traces of people that the Norse settlers
observed when they first came to Greenland, must
have been from the same kind of people they had met
in Vínland (i.e., the Dorset, the Beothuk or the Innu,
see Fig. 1). These people were called Skrælingar.
The meaning of this name is not totally clear, but
scholars indicate a degenerative: an unhealthy or
pitiful person (skral, skrælling svakelig person in
Falk and Torp 1992:735–736, 743). The etymology
is uncertain, and maybe there is room for some
speculation: the Old Norse word skrá means a hard,
dry skin (Heggstad et al. 1997:386), which might
relate to their dress, their looks, or their activity.
Vowel-mutation is common in Old Norse.
It is not known for certain whether the lead characters
in the thirteenth century Vínland sagas, such
as Leiv Eiriksson and Þorfinn Karlsefni, ever existed
(Halldórsson 2001, Keller 2001, Þorláksson 2001),
but archaeology certainly confirms that some Norse
people did go to L’Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland
ca. 1000 A.D. There is little doubt they came
from Iceland or Greenland.
This expedition was only a little more than a
century after the chief Ohthere performed his exploratory
journey to the White Sea. Both Ohthere and the
L’Anse aux Meadows Norse crossed ethnic and climatic
boundaries. Both groups must have been aware
of indigenous people, and both were far from home.
Ohthere certainly managed to acquire goods suited
for the European market; less is known about the revenue
of the L’Anse aux Meadows Norse.
The Norse and the Stockfish
Another commodity in northern Norway was
stockfish. Stockfish is cod which has been freezedried
without the use of salt; either hanging on racks
or spread on cobble-stones. It can only be processed
within a limited climatic window with the temperature
fluctuating around the point of freezing. The best
climatic conditions for this process are found in the
late winter at the Lofoten and Ofoten archipelagos in
North Norway, which are also the winter spawning
grounds for the skreið—the Barents Sea cod.
Studies of fish-bones from Iron-Age middens
in northern Norway suggest that the production of
stockfish goes back to the Old Iron Age (Perdikaris
1998), and the early date for professional fishing is
supported by recent archaeological discoveries of
Migration Period fishing booths in Nusfjord (Lundebye
2005:9).
2010 C. Keller 7
Early commercial trade in stockfish appears to
have taken place within the region and it does not
seem to have become a commodity of the international
commercial markets until after the trade of furs was
established; it was only in the Middle Ages that the
trade between Scandinavia and Europe came to involve
bulk commodities and large amounts of foodstuffs.
The commercial fishing and stockfish production
in Lofoten did not take off until the mid-twelfth
century. The fish were then exported to Europe by
way of Nidaros (present-day Trondheim) and Bergen
(KLNM vol. 4:366–370; for zoo-archaeological evidence
see Nielsen 2010 and Perdikaris 1996, 1998,
1999; see also Nielsen 2010 for Norwegian fishing
and and Lajus 2010 for fishing in Northern Russia).
Before this time, the stockfish was produced
for local storage and consumption, and probably
also for local and regional trade. It may be attributed
to the Viking Period type of trade. As already
mentioned, in this system, expensive, low-volume
commodities traveled far, while large-volume foodstuffs
were typically exchanged regionally, but not
long-distance. Still, storable foods could have vital
importance as strategic resources.
Already during the Late Iron Age, the stockfish
made its impact on North Norwegian economics
and politics. It is the perfect staple food, it preserves
well (four to six years), and it could feed
armies. The Viking Period chieftains of the Lofoten
and Ofoten regions (see Näsman and Roesdahl
2003:292–294) thus occupied a unique geographical
location with access to two major sources of
power: the Sami trade and a steady supply of stockfish.
Not without reason, the Lofoten and Ofoten
regions feature a concentration of court-sites and
chieftain’s seats. The site at Borg in the island of
Vestvågøy is a house-hold name to northern archaeologists,
due to the excavations of a hall of over
80 m—the largest skáli8 in Scandinavia (Munch et
al. 2003). It is important to understand that this hall
did not symbolize the fringe of the civilized world,
but was an economic focal-point in its own right,
representing a surplus of a very different nature
than the agrarian surplus of South Scandinavia.
Readers of Snorri Sturlusson’s Heimskringla—
The Sagas of the Norwegian Kings (Hollander 1999)
will recognize that members of the aristocratic families
of northern Norway were powerful agents in the
politics leading to a unified Norwegian kingdom.
Politically speaking, what was eventually to become
the State of Norway consisted of several centers of
gravity.
The Southwest Coast was the starting-point of the
unification process, and the engine in the political development.
The decisive (and semi-mythical) battle
allegedly took place at Hafrsfjord, near present-day
Stavanger some time during 870–900 A.D. There
were two challenges to this west Norwegian claim
to supreme kingship. One came from the north, from
Hålogaland and Trøndelag. The other came from the
east and south, from Viken and Denmark/England.
Viken was the name of the larger Oslo fjord, which
was periodically subject to the Danish kings, being
part of or close to the Danish home waters.
Hålogaland was the name of the coastal region
north of Trøndelag. The Bjarkey chiefs (the northernmost
chieftain’s seat and court-site) and the Håløyg
chiefs (i.e., from Hålogaland) were active in the
quest for royal supremacy in Norway. The Håløyg
chiefs moved south to settle at Hlaði (present-day
Lade) on the Trondheimsfjord, and at times allied
with Danish kings to rule as their vassals. They
appear in the sagas as the Earls of Hlaði based in
Trøndelag, but they originated in northern Norway
(Hansen and Olsen 2004:152). A famous character
was Eirik of Lade, a warrior chief who joined Danish
King Svend forkbeard in his 1014 A.D. conquest
of England and was an ally of Svend’s son Cnut the
Great (1014–1035 A.D.) (Haywood 1995:121). Ólafr
Haralðsson, the Norwegian King from 1015–1028
A.D. and the later Patron Saint of the Norwegian
Church, was killed in the battle of Stiklestad 1030
A.D. (in Trøndelag) when challenging the Dano/
English King Cnut the Great, who was also King of
Norway from 1028 A.D. Cnut’s Norwegian allies
were the Earls of Lade. Eventually, the Earls of Lade
and the local chiefs in Lofoten and Ofoten lost out to
the Norwegian king, and their control with the Sami
fur trade was passed on to the king’s representatives
(Hansen and Olsen 2004:153–155).
The Icelanders must have been familiar with
the value of the Sami trade and its potential for the
European market. If we are to believe the Icelandic
Landnámabók (The Book of Settlements from the
thirteenth century) (Benediktsson 1986a), distinguished
people from Lofoten migrated to Iceland
in pagan times. The manuscript version in Melabók
says (in translation): “Ólafr Tvennumbruni went to
Iceland from the island named Lófót, it lies close
to Finnmọrk.” Other manuscripts (Hauksbók and
Sturlubók) have longer entries, describing that Ólafr
settled at Ólafsvöllur, at Skeið, between Þiorsá and
Sandlækur. (Translation in Nielsen 2003:278, slightly
modified by me). The link between Lofoten and
the land of the Sami was worth noting, even as far
away as in Iceland.
The crucial element here is the geographical
setting of these Norse peoples, on the Arctic fringe,
near the boundaries between sedentary farmers and
mobile hunter-gatherers. The position allowed them
to harvest Arctic and sub-Arctic resources, either
directly or indirectly, and profit from the distribution
of these goods to the high end of the European
luxury market. This situation was possible due to a
8 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
describes how the Rus settled and started extorting
tribute on a regular basis. The Viking Period Norse
were not after fur as such; they shipped the fur east
in exchange for Oriental silver. Sawyer and Sawyer
(1993:146) observe that by the ninth and tenth centuries,
Scandinavians did more trade with the Muslims
than with the Byzantine Christians. They traded in
slaves, fur, amber, arrows, swords, armor, falcons,
wax, and honey, in addition to walrus tusks, which
in the twelfth century were also exported to Iran and
India (Lewicki 1962:8, Sawyer 1987:114).
Peter Sawyer wrote: “The written evidence from
Islam, Byzantium and Franks is remarkably consistent.
Scandinavians, known as Rus, established
themselves in Russia in the first half of the ninth
century, apparently attracted by the prospect of
gathering furs and slaves, as well as other produce
of the forests and the Arctic to sell in the flourishing
markets on the Volga.” (Sawyer 1987:117)
The true origins of the Rus may never be found,
but the Viking town Birka in eastern Sweden was
the Scandinavian gateway to the eastern trade. Birka
was located on the island Björkö in the landscape of
Uppland. It succeeded Helgö as a trading center in the
Mälardalen, a lake-and-valley system near presentday
Stockholm. Björkö was a fortified, nucleated
settlement in style with contemporary North European
emporia (ports-of-trade) such as Haithabu (Heiþabu)
in Schleswig (Callmer 1994; Clarke and Ambrosiani
1995:46–89; Jankuhn 1986; Clarke and Simms 1984;
Maixner 2010; Müller-Wille 1988, 1989; Resi 1979,
1987, 1990; Schietzel 1969–, 1981, 1985), Dorestad
in Frisia (Clarke and Ambrosiani 1995:24–29; Kars
1985; Sarfatij et al. 1999; Van Es 1969; Van Es and
Verwers 1980, 2009; Van Es et al. 1999), and Wolin
in the Pomeranian Bay in the Baltic (Clarke and Ambrosiani
1995:112–115; Filipowiak 1981, 1985, 1986,
1989, 1991).
Birka is mentioned in Rimbert’s Vita Ansgari
from the mid-ninth century (Odelman 1986, Robinson
1921) and in Adam of Bremen’s History of
the Archbishops of Hamburg-Bremen from ca. 1070
A.D. (Tschan 2002). The pagan cemetery at Birka
contained ca. 1600 graves (some give higher numbers),
many of which show influence from the east,
both in burial customs, dress, and artifacts.
By the mid-eighth century, the Norse sailed
into the Gulf of Finland to where St. Petersburg
was built much later, and up the river Neva to Lake
Ladoga, where the trading center Staraja Ladoga
(Old Ladoga) on the river Volchov developed. It
was called Aldeigjuborg by the Norse (Kirpichnikov
1989, Lindquist 1985, Sawyer 1987:113–130, Sawyer
and Sawyer 1993:146). The Scandinavian pagan
cemetery is located at Plakun on the opposite bank,
while the Slavic graves (called sopkij) adorn several
high features in the area. From Staraja Ladoga, the
stratified social structure and the existence of a viable
European trade network.
Margins and ethnic boundaries are often scenes of
conflict, but also of profit. When the Icelanders pushed
west into regions dominated by Arctic drift-ice and
the Greenland ice-cap ca. 1000 A.D., they too crossed
ecological and ethnic boundaries. They too came in
contact with pagan hunter-gatherers, the Skrælings
(whoever they were). They too could harvest extreme
riches from the sub- and high-Arctic regions.
In the delivery end, they plugged into the same
European markets as did the fur traders from North
Norway, Sweden, Staraja Ladoga, and Novgorod
(see below). They probably obtained roughly the
same type of goods in return. In the Early Middle
Ages, the Norse Greenland walrus hunts were therefore
not a unique phenomenon, just another arena for
the European harvesting of the Arctic (see Perdikaris
and McGovern 2008b).
In 985 or 988 A.D. (i.e., contemporary with the
colonization of Greenland), the Arab geographer
and resident of Jerusalem, Al-Mukadassi, wrote a
treatise on geography where the trade-goods from
Bulgar (on the Volga bend) were described: “…
sables, miniver, ermines, and the fur of steppe foxes,
martens, foxes, beavers, spotted hares, and goats;
also wax, arrows, birch bark, high fur caps, fish glue,
fish teeth, castoreum [a perfume fixative derived
from beaver glands], prepared horse hides, honey,
hazelnuts, falcons, swords, armor, khalanj wood,
Slavonic slaves, sheep and cattle. All these come
from Bulgar …” (quoted from Martin 1986:12, also
notes 46 and 47 op. cit. p. 179, my underlining).
Fish teeth was a common medieval term for
walrus tusks (Sawyer and Sawyer 1993:146). Even
in the Norwegian medieval work The King’s Mirror,
the walrus was classified as a fish, although its
nature as a whale or a seal was subject to debate.
(GHM III:320–321, or Larsson 1917).
Christian Europe was, in other words, not the
only market for walrus ivory.
The Fur Trade in the East
Janet Martin makes this presentation of the early
Norse (Rus) in Russia: “The market in Bulgar [on
the Volga bend; my comment], where fur contributed
by the Bulgar populace, their neighbors, and
the Ves’, was sold, attracted one final group of suppliers,
the Rus. Almost as soon as they arrived in
eastern Europe, they became the most prominent
fur suppliers in Bulgar’s fur trade network … The
Rus took their captives and other booty they seized
from the native Slav and Finn tribes, conducted
them to Bulgar, and sold them. Among the booty
was precious northern fur. In this manner the Rus
entered the fur trade.” (Martin 1986:8–9). She then
2010 C. Keller 9
in the form of Byzantine coins in the hoards (Noonan
1980a, 1980b, 1980c, 1981; Sawyer 1987:124).
Around 1000 A.D., the silver stream from the east
ground to a halt as the silver mines dried out, roughly
at about the same time as the exploratory journeys
from Greenland to Newfoundland. The implication is
that closing trade-routes to the east helped stimulate
search for new trade-routes or sources of trade-goods
to the west.
The main source on early Russia is the Primary
Chronicle or The Account of the Bygone Years, also
known as the Nestor Chronicle. Its first, semilegendary
part states that in the year 6367 (reckoned
from Adam in the Russian Orthodox chronology,
equaling 859 A.D. in Roman Catholic terms), “the
Varangians came from the other side of the ocean
and extorted tax among the Čud’, and Slovenians,
among Merja and Vepsians plus the Krivičians. The
Kozars extorted tax from the Poljanis, the Severs,
and the Vjatičians; they demanded one white squirrel
per household.” (From Svane 1983, my translation
from Danish).
The legacy of the Rus remains in the name Russia.
Still, the role of the Rus in the making of a
Russian State has been contested: the controversy
is known as the Normanist debate, the issue being
whether the state was originally established by people
of Norse descent, or by Slavic peoples (Noonan
1997:138; Schmidt 1971; Stalsberg 1979, 1982; see
Franklin and Shepard 1996 chapter 8 and p. 415 for
dynastic overviews).
Any which way, a Russian state was established
by Rjurik (862–879 A.D.), and the ensuing dynasty
was to last for nearly eight centuries. Different
manuscript versions of the chronicle suggest that
he either settled at Staraja Ladoga, or at Gorodiŝĉe
(Norse Holmgarðr); the original fortress was 2 km
upstream from the later Novgorod (Fig. 2). Novgorod
means the new fortress.
Novgorod lies on the river Volkhov 6 km downstream
from the Lake Ilmen, which by many scholars
is considered the nodal point of the Russian
river trade-routes. Through short portages, the rivers
Dvina, Dnieper, and Volga can be accessed; they
lead to the White Sea, the Black Sea and the Caspian
Sea—entrances to the northern as well as the Byzantine
and Muslim worlds (Clarke and Ambrosiani
1995:121–122).
Rjurik’s son Oleg (Old Norse name Helgi) shifted
the center of the Rus state to Kiev on the Dnieper
in present-day Ukraine. Dnieper drains south into
the Black Sea.
This dynasty, and the Kiev state, was Christianized
when Grand Prince Vladimir converted to
Orthodox Christianity, but many of the Finnishspeaking
tribes further north remained pagans. The
Scandinavian way of extorting “tax” from the Sami
Norse could plug into the already existing trade networks
that connected Eastern Europe to the Middle
East and the Orient by way of the large rivers, as
occurred in the eighth century. The first hoard of
Islamic dirhams was deposited at Staraja Ladoga in
the 780s A.D., and there was evidence of glass-bead
production, meant for trade with the Finnish tribes
(Noonan 1986:222–223 and 341, 1989b, 1997:142).
The Scandinavians who went east were known
by two terms; the Rus and the Varjagr (Varangians).
The etymology and exact meanings of the terms are
unclear. The Rus may initially have been Swedes;
the Nestor Chronicle (below) states that they came
“from the other side of the ocean” (the Baltic?). In
Finnish, “Ruotsi” means “Swedish”, but the etymology
for Rus is contested, as is the ethnicity of the
people it refers to.
The Varangians seem to have been associated
with mercenaries, many of whom came to serve in
the Varangian guard in Byzantium. The majority
was Norse, but they recruited from many nationalities
(Avdusin 1970; Franklin and Shepard 1996;
Hannestad et al 1970; Noonan 1986 (with an overview
of Norse finds in the East), 1985, 1989a, 1989b,
1992, 1994a, 1994b, 1997:135–138, 1998; Schmidt
1971; Stalsberg 1979, 1982).
Some Old Norse words and phrases have interesting
implications about connections and contemporary
perceptions: Svíþjóð was the Old Norse name
for Sweden, and a related term Svíþjóð hin mikla
(Greater Sweden) sometimes referred to Scythia in
southeast Europe, and sometimes to the land of the
Rus, i.e., the region between Ladoga and Kiev. Another
contemporary term, Garðaríki, also indicated
the Novgorod/Kiev region, but went out of use in the
thirteenth century.
The ultimate target for the Norse appears to have
been oriental silver, much of which ended up in innumerable
hoards in the Baltic and in Scandinavia.
Silver had been mined and minted in the Middle East
from early on, but had disappeared from circulation
in the Caucasus in the seventh century. A revolution
in the Caliphate ca. 750 A.D. introduced a new
dynasty, the Abbasids, who improved the relations
with the Khazars on the lower Volga. Through what
is sometimes called “Pax Khazarica”, the trans-Eurasian
trade flourished between the White Sea and the
Baltic in the northwest, and the Black and the Caspian
Seas in the southeast. Countless finds of Perm-type
silver rings, Cufic coins, and hacksilber9 suggest the
east Scandinavians emulated Oriental weight systems
(Hårdh 1996:169–170; Franklin and Shepard 1996:3–
70 in a chapter aptly named “The Silver-Seekers from
the North [c. 750–c. 900]”; Martin 1986:60; Noonan
1986,1997:145–147). The written sources suggest
there was also a substantial trade between Kiev and
Constantinople, but this has not left much evidence
10 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Figure 2. The modern Baltic and Scandinavian states. Ohthere, who according to Orosius lived “furthest north of all Norwegians”,
travelled to the “Land of the Biarmas” in 15 days, and to Sciringshael (Kaupang in Vestfold) in 1 month. His
voyages took place towards the end of the ninth century. His voyages are indicated in line with the common interpretation of
his tale, but the description contains some logical inconsistencies, and may be subject to debate. The Baltic route from Birka
(earlier from near-by Helgö) to Staraja Ladoga was established at least one hundred years earlier, at the end of the eighth
century. This route gave access to the great trade systems on the Russian rivers, opening up for two centuries of cash-flow
from the oriental silver mines to the Scandinavian countries. The towns of Vágar, Bergen, and Nidaros were established
later, but are indicated here in brackets.
2010 C. Keller 11
outlook and political culture, which was to leave
trace till the present day
From the 1260s A.D., two German orders (The
Livonian Knights and the Teutonic Knights) launched
crusades against Prussia, Lithuania, and Livonia (in
present-day Estonia and Latvia), and thereby gave
the German merchants a leverage in the Baltic trade.
By the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the German
Hanse had merchant houses in the Peterhof District of
Novgorod and de facto control of the trade in the Baltic
(Martin 1986:61–62).
The western Europeans were not the only ones
to use religion as an excuse for territorial expansion:
from the eleventh to the sixteenth centuries, Orthodox
monasteries were “colonizing” the regions north
was applied by the Rus in the Kiev state, extorting tax
from the Finnish tribes (Noonan 1989b). Throughout
the Middle Ages, the “right” to tax the Sami and the
Finns led to a series of confrontations between the
Scandinavian countries and the Kiev State, and later
also with Kiev’s successors Novgorod and Moscow.
Kievan sovereign Jaroslav the Wise (978–1054)
anticipated the competition from Scandinavia. He
converted the Finnish-speaking Karelians en masse
to Orthodox Christianity, in order to create a Christian
buffer against the recently converted Roman Catholic
Norse. It was a curse disguised as a blessing, and
it brought disaster to the Karelians. With the Great
Schism in 1054 A.D., i.e., the permanent separation
of the Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox
churches, the Karelians became the
eternal border-population between East
and West. Jaroslav’s Christianization
strategy backfired.
The Karelians established themselves
as the primary collectors of furs
from the Sami and Finns, partly on
behalf of Novgorod, partly on behalf
of Scandinavians. They also launched
armed attacks on Northern Norway to
stall Norwegian tax collectors, for example
in 1278 and 1322–26 A.D. (which
included abductions) and in 1349. In
1323 A.D., they burned the estate of
Bjarkøy in Ofoten. The owner was
Erlingr Víðkunnsson, who also owned
the Giske and Svovreim estates in West
Norway and was regent for the child-
King Magnús Eiríksson. He retaliated,
which ended with the treaty of Nöteborg
(below). (Christiansen 1997:189).
Scandinavian kings and German
orders launched a series of crusades and
invasions south and east of the Baltic,
from 1142 to 1349 A.D. (see Christiansen
1997 for a full presentation). The fact
that the Sami and many of the Finnish
tribes were pagans was used to entice
the Pope’s support for crusades which
were in fact trade wars in disguise.
Orthodox Christians were not spared
from attacks, and so during the Christian
Middle Ages, the Baltic became the
battlefield between the Roman Catholic
and the Orthodox worlds.
The northern crusades are less
known than the Levantine ones, and
although smaller in scale, they were
numerous and far more successful.
They imposed the Roman Catholic belief
upon the Baltic and Finnish populations,
and secured a Western European
Figure 3. The northern expansion of Orthodox monasteries (shining stars)
into Finnish and Sami territories, from the eleventh to the sixteenth centuries.
The numbers indicate the century in which each monastery was founded. The
economy of the monasteries was closely linked to the fur trade. (Redrawn
from Hansen and Olsen 2004:221 plate 44, who reference Storå 1977).
12 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Kiev was overrun in 1241 A.D., and Novgorod
suddenly found itself independent of the Kiev State.
This turn of events allowed Novgorod to create its
own fur-trading empire by expanding north, all the
way to the Barents Sea.
In the 1250s A.D., an agreement between the Norwegian
King Hákon Hákonsson and the Principal of
Novgorod Alexander Nevsky was negotiated, giving
the Norse the rights of free passage “as before”.
As already mentioned, a Swedish-Norwegian
peace treaty with Novgorod at Nöteborg (German
name: Schlüsselburg) in 1323 A.D. was followed by
the two Agreements of Novgorod from 1326 A.D.,
between Sweden and Novgorod, and between Norway
and Novgorod, respectively (Hansen and Olsen
2004:169–175, Sawyer and Sawyer 1993:68–69).
As a result, the peoples of Finnmọrk and the Kola
Peninsula were double-taxed by fur traders from
both Novgorod and Norway/Sweden between 1326
and 1493 A.D. (Fig. 5). Novgorod accepted the sovereignty
of Moscow in 1478 A.D., but the interest in
taxation of the Sami did not evaporate.
of Lake Ladoga, up to the White Sea and westwards
on the Kola Peninsula to Petsamo (Hansen and Olsen
2004:220–223) (Fig. 3).
The decline of Byzantium and the disruption of
the river trade routes by the Mongols in the thirteenth
century (Fig. 4) triggered a shift of focus. Novgorod
had previously exported furs in three directions: to
Bulgar in the east, to Kiev in the south, and to the Baltic
in the west. Janet Martin writes: “In response to
the demands of all three markets, Novgorod extended
its realm, carved out new trade routes across northern
Russia, and subjected non-Russian tribes to tributary
status. From those tribes, Novgorod collected luxury
fur. From the northern population in districts subject
to direct Novgorodian administration, it collected
squirrel pelts.” (Martin 1986:60) (Fig. 4).
Around 1240 A.D., an invasion of Mongols led
by Batu Khan (Djenghis Khan’s grandson) assaulted
Eastern Europe through Russia (Fig. 4). They sacked
Poland, Schlesvig, and Hungary, only to pull back to
the Volga later on. This huge Khanate or state was
called The Golden Horde after its main camp. It survived
until 1360 A.D., when it started deteriorating.
Figure 4. The major trade routes (dotted lines) from the Baltic to the Black Sea, Byzantium, and the Caspian Sea. By establishing
Staraja Ladoga in the late eighth century, the Norse plugged into this vast trade network.When Kiev was overrun by
the Golden Horde (grey shaded arrows) in 1241 A.D., opportunity knocked at the gates of Novgorod. Finding themselves
independent of the Kiev State, they established a fur-trading empire that reached to the Barents Sea.
2010 C. Keller 13
Novgorod, and in principle, controlled the Western
European fur trade (KLNM vol. 6:199–200).
Despite the fact that the fur trade to a great extent
was a luxury trade, it developed to something like
an industry during the Middle Ages, with a typical
Novgorod not only controlled the fur trade to
Western Europe, but also to the Middle East, using
the same river routes as the Norse had done during
the Viking Period. From the mid-fourteenth
century, the German Hanse established an office in
Figure 5. Novgorod’s five administrative districts (numbered 1–5) and its network of fortified support points (black
diamonds) for trade and tax-collection. The grey shaded area up north indicates the region that was double-taxed from
Norwegian-Russian and Swedish-Russian sides respectively. (Based on Hansen and Olsen 2004:156, Fig. 28).
14 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
The economic structure behind the power of
the fish-trading Hanse was the imbalance of foodresources
between the Baltic and northern Norway.
A surplus of grain in the south was exchanged for a
surplus of fish in the north.
This trade relationship had consequences for
the settlement pattern and the cultural landscape in
northern Norway, and subsequently also in Iceland.
While a sort of local subsistence economy was always
maintained, the market economy demanded
that more and more labor be invested in commercial
fishing. Labor-intensive tasks in the subsistence
economy, such as cereal cultivation, were largely
abandoned, creating an increased dependency on
imported grain. (Based on KLNM vol. 4:366–370).
It is interesting to note that furs and lýsi (lamp
oil, which at this point in time was almost certainly
made from cod liver) were often riding with the
stockfish cargoes. Not all furs were luxury items—
some were simple pelts for lining, bedding, etc., i.e.,
ordinary consumption goods. (KLNM loc.cit.).
During the Middle Ages, the old ethnic boundary
between the Norse and the Sami was overrun.
Norse fishermen settled in fishing-stations on the
outer coast, often in locations devoid of vegetation
(and pasture), in what was previously Sami territory,
all the way east to the Varangerfjord (Hansen
and Olsen 2004:165–169). By 1307 A.D., Norwegian
King Hákon V. Magnusson erected a fortress
Vardöhús at the entrance to Varangerfjord11, to
block Karelian attacks.
This territorial expansion was motivated both by
the fur trade and the commercial fishing alike, and
could not have happened without solid backing from
the international trade network, which provided
these northerly regions with a steady supply of grain
in exchange for furs and fish. A long-distance interdependency
between ecologically diverse regions
had been created.
With time, however, more and more of the furs
from the Sami area went to the southeast, to the Bay
of Bothnia. From the fourteenth century, the Bothnian
trade became increasingly directed towards
Stockholm and Åbo (Turku in present-day Finland)
as the export harbors (KLNM vol. 4:358). At the
same time, more and more of the fish from Lofoten
and Finnmọrk went to the southwest, to Bergen and
Western Europe. With the risk of oversimplifying,
one might say that the furs were headed for the
Hanse in the Baltic, while the stockfish was headed
for the Hanse in Bergen (Hansen 1990).
The Norse and the Stockfish in Iceland
Among historians, the traditional view has been
that the Icelanders fished for domestic trade, but did
medieval system of coercion and extortion, protocapitalism,
and feudal-style militarism working
hand in hand. The fact that the Hanse was running
the European delivery end of the trade makes it
belong to the high medieval type of trade, with its
highly sophisticated exchange networks.
The Norse and the Stockfish in Norway
With the coming of a different economy during
the Middle Ages, the Viking Age luxury trade gave
way to low-status bulk-trade with foodstuffs such as
grain and fish. This shift allowed the stockfish from
the Lofoten archipelago to enter the European market,
where it became a popular commodity, not the
least because it was an acceptable food during lent.
The first written evidence of commercial export
of stockfish is a court order in the Frostaþing Law10
from ca. 1115 A.D. Additional sources indicate that
the commercial fishing and stockfish export increased
throughout the century.
Vágar (Fig. 2)—in the present-day island of
Vestvågøy—was a short-lived town in the Lofoten
archipelago, created as a shipping and taxation
point. It declined during the fourteenth century, as
other towns took over as taxation-points further
south (Bertelsen 1985:168–181).
Nidaros (Fig. 2)—present-day Trondheim—became
the center of the newly established Norwegian
archdiocese from 1153 A.D., and was a thriving town
for national and international trade. The archbishop
himself was engaged in the stockfish trade. Some of
the stockfish was shipped by way of Nidaros, but the
location of this town was not altogether favorable
for the larger fish trade.
The town of Bergen (Fig. 2) on the Norwegian
west coast had much better location, close to the
sailing-routes and with a generous harbor. From the
late thirteenth century, official Norwegian policy
was to concentrate all foreign trade to the towns,
and Bergen became the official staple town for the
stockfish trade. From 1294 A.D., foreign ships were
not allowed to sail north of Bergen to buy fish, and
in 1361 A.D., King Hákon VI confirmed that the
burghers of Bergen had the unique privilege to trade
on all Norway, including the Norwegian tax-lands,
i.e., the Faroes, Iceland, and Greenland.
It sounded better than it was. After the 1320s
A.D., most of the Norwegian fish sent to Europe
went on German ships. From 1344 A.D., the Hanse
had a permanent “kontor” in Bergen (as it did in
London, Brügge, and Novgorod, with Lübeck as
the hub). As mentioned, the Hanse ships were not
allowed north of Bergen, which became the fiscal
point for the king and the church, as well as the major
international transit harbor.
2010 C. Keller 15
(KLNM loc. cit. and vol. 9:155–156), while at the
same time, the climate in the North Atlantic was becoming
less favorable for local cereal production.
It is possible that the escalating fishing industry
in Iceland may have left the Norse Greenland
colonies in an economic backwater. It has been
argued that ivory was no longer in fashion in
Europe, or that it could be obtained from alternative
sources, such as the White Sea (Roesdahl
2000:146 but see Seaver 2009) or from African elephants
(Pirenne 1939, Tegengren 1962). This may
have been the case, but it is just as likely that the
increased traffic on the Icelandic West Fjords led
to an increased number of ships in the Denmark
Strait, from where Greenland was in plain sight.
It is possible, therefore, that foreign ships trading
illegally in Iceland may have paid occasional
(and equally illegal) visits to Norse Greenland. If
they did, they had all the reasons in the world to
keep quiet about it. On the other hand, the climatic
records suggest increased drift-ice in Greenland
waters from the mid-fourteenth century, making it
difficult to cross the Denmark Strait (Dugmore et
al 2006, 2009).
The KLNM vol. 3:665 says: “The English commenced
their navigation on Iceland in ca. 1408, first
in search of fishing banks, but trade started from ca.
1412. The English trade in Iceland was a violation
of the trade privilege of the Bergen burghers, and a
threat against the King’s income from Iceland” (my
translation from Norwegian). The King in question
was in casu the Danish-Norwegian King Erik of
Pomerania, who accordingly was also the King of
the Faroes, Iceland, and Greenland. It is worth noting
that the wedding at Hvalsey Church 1408 A.D.,
which was well documented in Iceland, represents
the latest recorded sign of life in Norse Greenland
(Seaver 1996:155–156).
Conclusions
The basic idea in this paper is that there was
nothing extreme about the Norse colonization
of Greenland, even though establishing pastoral
farming in the Arctic is unusual by any standards.
Nor were the exploratory journeys to L’Anse aux
Meadows in Newfoundland all that extreme when
compared to other, well-documented exploratory
journeys conducted by the Norse in the same period,
north and east of Scandinavia.
Such voyages were not made for king and country
as the much later Arctic explorations, but were
typical for a period when luxury trade was combined
with extortion of the (often pagan) hunter-gatherers.
The expeditions to the Arctic fringe of the North
American continent must be seen as a quest for
commodities that could be exported to the European
not start commercial export of stockfish until the
fourteenth century (KLNM vol. 4:370–371).
Over the last couple of decades, systematic efforts
to identify the archaeological signatures of
commercial fishing in the North Atlantic have been
made (Amundsen 2004; Amundsen et al. 2005;
Krivigorskaya et al. 2005a, 2005b; Perdikaris and
McGovern 2007, 2008a, 2008b; Perdikaris et al.
2004b). Zoo-archaeological investigations under the
NABO (North Atlantic Bio-cultural Organization)
cooperative have yielded evidence that Icelanders
were already involved in stockfish production from
the initial settlement before 900 A.D. This production
was partly done for local consumption and
partly for regional exchange (but see Thór 2010 for
an extensive history of Icelandic fishing, and Lajus
for Russian fishing).
Commercial fishing for international export
seems to have started in the Icelandic West Fjords
around 1200 A.D., bringing Iceland in contact with
the medieval trade systems of Europe (Edvardsson
and McGovern 2005; Edvardsson et al. 2004; Krivigorskaya
et al. 2005, 2005b; Thór 2010; for fishing
ecology of the North Atlantic, see Starkey and Nielsen
2010). This shift was a transition from the Viking
Period type of trade, with its emphasis on chiefly
endeavors, as celebrated (retrospectively) in so many
Icelandic sagas. Iceland had joined the production
end of the medieval bulk trade with foodstuffs. Compared
to this development in medieval Iceland, the
Norse Greenland society, with its dependence on the
northern cash-hunts, begins to look old-fashioned or
even obsolete.
After the 1260s A.D., the stock-fish from Iceland
was formally required to be shipped by way of the
Norwegian fiscal point in Bergen. Still, it did not
take long before foreign ships started illegal traderuns
directly on the Icelandic fishing stations to pick
up their cargo, without paying dues to the Danish-
Norwegian king.
In the thirteenth to the fifteenth centuries, the
Icelanders owned only a few ships of their own, and
despite a substantial stock-fish production, they became
hostage to foreign traders: to the Norwegians
in the fourteenth century, to the English in the fifteenth
century, and to the Hansards from the 1470s
A.D. (KLNM vol. 4:370–371). During this time, few
items were taken abroad on Icelandic keel. Accordingly,
even Norse Greenland was beyond the reach
of the Icelanders.
Like in North Norway, the increased stockfish
export must have had consequences for Icelandic
agriculture and its cultural landscape. Iceland was
probably never self-supplied with grain, but cereal
imports may still have reduced the investment in
grain production. From the fourteenth century, cereals
were imported to Iceland in larger quantities
16 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Ocean on the other hand, with its generous ecosystems
teeming with life, offered opportunities both to
local communities and for food export. Large quantities
of fish that fed and grew in distant waters could
be harvested at the spawning grounds. This bounty
is what the Norse people of the Lofoten archipelago
exploited, and this is what the Icelanders did in the
West fjords.
The Norse Greenlanders may go into history as
the first Europeans to penetrate the North American
Arctic for commercial reasons: in order to acquire
the furs and ivory which, at the time, was
fancied by the European and Middle Eastern elites.
The Norse colonies in Greenland were founded for
such a purpose, and when the European craving
for walrus ivory faded, or the supplies dried out,
or the trade routes collapsed, the Greenlanders had
to close the shop. As such, the history of the
Greenlanders may symbolize the activities of
the civilized world in the Arctic: brave economic
adventures ending with collapse.
In this paper, the transition from a Viking Period
luxury trade to a high medieval bulk trade
with foodstuffs has been emphasized. It has also
been simplified. The arguments can be expressed
in two points. First, that Iceland appeared to have
had limited resources for export prior to the 1200
A.D. development of the stockfish trade. Their main
alternative—vaðmál—was a labor-intensive export
commodity based on sheep. It is therefore tempting
to see the colonization of Greenland and the exploration
of the Canadian east coast as initiated from Iceland,
with exports for the European luxury market in
mind. Second, that with the change of the European
trade economy, and the establishment of large-scale
commercial fishing in North Norway and in the
Icelandic West Fjords, the economic framework that
Norse Greenland was a part of, transformed with
disastrous consequences. The demographic and economic
impact of the Black Death upon the European
economy, and the increased climatic instability in
the North Atlantic (Dugmore et al 2006, 2009), must
have hurt both the Norse Greenland subsistence
economy and the overseas market for walrus ivory.
Besides, the Greenland goods met fierce competition
from Novgorod after ca. 1250 A.D.
As previously emphasized, the trade with expensive
goods continued through the Middle Ages.
It was an upper-class phenomenon, but eventually
even the upper classes got involved in bulk trade
with foodstuffs, leather, skins, cloth, beer, and semiindustrial
products. The actual exchange took place
in towns, under royal and ecclesiastical control,
often regulated by privileges. For North Norway
and Iceland, the king tried at least periodically to
maintain a food-for-food balance, in order to prevent
a negative export of food in times of starvation
luxury market, rather than attempts to establish
permanent settlements based on animal husbandry.
The colonization of Greenland as well as of
Sami and Finnish territories were probably triggered
by the same type of economic thinking. Traditionally,
the feudal economies in Central Europe, where
the liege lords combined military obligations with
large-scale land-ownership and extortion, has been
regarded as the archetype of the predatory medieval
economy. The so-called coercion-extortion cycle
(Bagge 1989) was not limited to agricultural societies,
and the commodities obtained need not have
been agricultural produce. Luxury articles such as
furs, ivory, falcons, and live polar bears were probably
among the first commodities in the Norse world
to be paid for in cash, albeit the coins were silver
dirhams from the Abassid dynasty.
It is typical that the supply of such luxury articles
was obtained at the margins of the civilized world
(civilized in this context meaning societies that were
hierarchically organized), with a certain military
capacity, and above all, with established trade networks,
and a proto-capitalistic market.
With the development of commercial fishing
throughout the Middle Ages, Sami territory
was again invaded, but this time it was the Norse
themselves who settled to harvest the ocean for its
riches in cod. In present-day Finnmark in northern
Norway, this colonization continued into the sixteenth
century.
From the time of the Vikings till today’s globalized
economy, the developed world has raped the
Arctic for commercial reasons. The local huntergatherers
were taxed, exploited, displaced, converted,
and enslaved. Today, travelers to the Arctic
will find the Arctic landscape a junk-yard for past
economic adventures, spanning from sixteenth-century
whaling stations to twentieth-century oilrigs,
gas-pipes, and strip-mines. Abandoned installations
from the Cold War as well as older conflicts are
found in unexpected places.
Norway in the Viking Period was a typical example
of a land with a dual economy: a consumption-
based agricultural economy in the south, and
an export-based fur-trade economy in the north. It
is almost a paradox that these northern economies
were more tied to the commercial sphere and the
monetary exchange system of Central Europe than
were the agricultural economies further south.
However, when the opportunities for commercial
fishing arose within the Scandinavian economies
during the twelfth century, the Norse entered the European
sphere of large-scale food-production for the
first time. On dry land, whether Arctic or Sub-Arctic,
the marginal ecology simply could not produce
enough biomass to sustain anything but a scattered
population, not to mention food export. The Arctic
2010 C. Keller 17
Special thanks also to Svend Erik Albrethsen of
Miljøstyrelsen, Danish Environmental Protective Agency,
who taught me most of what I know about Norse Greenland,
and Jette Arneborg of SILA, National Museum of
Denmark, who has continued my education through numerous
exchanges.
Lars Ivar Hansen, University of Tromsø, has generously
shared his knowledge about Sami history over the
years, and duly deserves my gratitude.
Literature Cited
Amundsen, C. 2004. Farming and maritime resources at
Miðbær on Flatey in Breiðafjord, northwest Iceland.
Pp. 203–210, In R. Housley and G.M. Coles (Eds.).
Atlantic Connections and Adaptations: Economics,
Environments, and Subsistence in Lands Bordering
the North Atlantic. Oxbow, Oxford, UK.
Amundsen, C., S. Perdikaris, T.H. McGovern, Y.
Krivogorskaya, M. Brown, K. Smiarowski, S. Storm,
S. Modugno, M. Frik, and M. Koczela. 2005. Fishing
booths and fishing strategies in Medieval Iceland: An
archaeofauna from the of Akurvík, northwest Iceland.
Environmental Archaeology 10(2):141–198.
Avdusin, D.A. 1970. Material culture in the towns of ancient
Rus. Pp. 95–106, In K. Hannestad (Ed.). Varangian
Problems: Report on the First International Symposium
on the Theme “The Eastern Connections of
the Nordic peoples in the Viking Period and the Early
Middle Ages”, Moesgaard, University of Aarhus, 7th –
11th October 1968. Scando-Slavica, Supplementum 1.
Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bagge, S. 1989. State building in Medieval Norway.
The origin of the state. Pp. 129–146, In Forum for
utviklingsstudier. NUPI (Norwegian Institute of
International Affairs and Norwegian Association for
Development) no. 2 1989. Oslo, Norway.
Bagge, S., S. Holstad Smedsdal, and K. Helle. 1973. Norske
Middelalder dokumenter i utvalg. Universitetsforlaget
Bergen – Oslo – Tromsø, Norway.
Benediktsson, J. (Ed.). 1986a. Landnámabók. Pp. 29–397,
In Íslendingabók Landnámabók. Series: Íslenzk fornrit
Vol 1. Reykjavík, Iceland.
Benediktsson, J. (Ed.). 1986b. Íslendingabók. Pp. 1–28,
In Íslendingabók Landnámabók. Series: Íslenzk fornrit
Vol 1. Reykjavík, Iceland.
Bertelsen, R. 1985. Lofoten og Vesterålens historie. Fra
den eldste tida til ca. 1500 e.Kr. Kommunene i Lofoten
og Vesterålen.
Birnbaum, H. 1996. Novgorod in Focus. Selected Essays.
With a Foreword by V.L. Yanin. Slavica Publishers,
Inc. Columbus, OH, USA.
Blackburn, M.A.S., and D.M. Metcalf (Eds.). 1981. Viking
Age Coinage in the Northern Lands. BAR International
Series 122. Oxford, UK.
Bratrein, H.D. 2001. Finnekongen Martin og rikskongen
Håkon den femte. Håløygminne Vol. 82 (1).
Brisbane, M. (Ed.). 1992. The archaeology of Novgorod,
Russia. Recent results from the town and its hinterland.
The Society for Medieval Archaeology Monograph
Series: No. 13. Lincoln, UK.
Brisbane, M., and D. Gaimster (Eds.). 2001. Novgorod:
The archaeology of a Russian medieval city and its
hinterland. The British Museum Occasional Paper
Number 411. London, UK.
(KLNM vol. 4:366–372). There are no indications
that the Norse Greenlanders were ever subject to a
similar policy.
Compared to Scandinavia proper, the development
of trade in the North Atlantic demonstrates a
delay. The Greenland tusk trade became a dinosaur,
and since the Greenlanders had no more ships than
the Icelanders, they became hostages to foreign merchants
who had no obligation to (and were not even
allowed to) trade in Greenland.
It is no coincidence that Norway stagnated politically
and economically more or less at the same time
as Greenland. There were political reasons for this
coincidental downturn: there was the Black Death
and the economic collapse which followed, there
was the issue of Danish vs. Norwegian regents, and
there was the change in trade patterns and the coming
of the Hanse.
Still, the bottom line is that research on the Norse
world has suffered from national compartmentalization;
if each country stuck to its “own” history,
everybody would be happy. But today’s world is
one of globalized economy, geopolitical issues, and
global environmental problems. History is getting
globalized, too, and the old national narratives do
not have the explanatory capacity to answer the basic
question: how did we get into the situation we are
in now?
It is very simple, really: to understand Norse
Greenland, we must understand the economy and
culture of medieval Europe. Norse Greenlanders
were not freaks, nor were they larger-than-life explorers;
they acted within the economic and mental
framework of their fellow Europeans. And their behavior
towards indigenous people at the edge of the
world was, after all, not that different from ours.
Acknowledgments
Many scholars have influenced and inspired this paper.
First of all, Anne Stalsberg of the Museum of Natural
History and Archaeology, NTNU (University of Science
and Technology, Trondheim) deserves great thanks for her
never-ending support, and for being a mine of information
about the Norse in Eastern Europe.
Great thanks are also due to friends and members of
the North Atlantic Biocultural Organization (NABO) cooperative:
in particular, Thomas H. McGovern, Hunter
College, CUNY, Sophia Perdikaris, Brooklyn College,
CUNY, Orri Vésteinsson, University of Iceland, and
Andrew J. Dugmore, Edinburgh School of Geoscience,
for being inspirational discussion partners and for constantly
supplying new data. Perdikaris’ and McGovern’s
2007, 2008a, 2008b works are directly relevant to the
present paper.
Kirsten A. Seaver has been a valuable discussion partner
with whom I share many interests, she has also read
the manuscript and kindly (but not always successfully)
suggested corrections and improvements.
18 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Filipowiak, W. 1981. Wolin, Polan. Pp. 61–69, In G.
Milne and B. Hobley (Eds.). Waterfront Archaeology
in Britain and Northern Europe. CBA Res. Rep. 41.
London, UK.
Filipowiak, W. 1985. Die Bedeuting Wollins im Ostseehandel.
Pp. 121–138, In S.-O. Lindquist (Ed.). Society
and Trade in the Baltic during the Viking Age. Acta
Visbyensia VII. Visby, Sweden.
Filipowiak, W. 1986. Wolin - Vineta: Wykopaliska zatopionego
miasta = Ausgrabungen in einer versunkenen
Stadt / [Organisatoren: Muzeum Narodowe Szczecin
... [et al.] ; Leitung: Wĺ adysĺ aw Filipowiak] Muzeum
Narodowe Szczecin. Rostock, Germany.
Filipowiak, W. 1989. Handel und Handelsplätze and der
Ostseeküste Westpommerns. Pp. 690–719, In M. Müller-
Wille (Ed.). Oldenburg – Wolin – Staraja Ladoga
– Novgorod – Kiev. Handel und Handelsverbindungen
im südliches und östlichen Ostseeraum während des
frühen Mittelalters. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen
Kommission, 69, Mainz, Germany.
Filipowiak, W. 1991. Wolin-Jomsborg. En vikingatidens
handelsby i Polen. Roskilde, Denmark.
Fitzhugh, W.W., and E. Ward (Eds.). 2000. Vikings—The
North Atlantic Saga. Smithsonian Institution Press,
Washington, DC.
Franklin, S., and J. Shepard. 1996. The Emergence of Rus
750–1200. Longman History of Russia. Longman,
London, UK and New York, NY, USA.
Fritzner, J. 1954. Ordbog over Det gamle norske Sprog.
Nytt uforandret opptrykk av 2. utgave (1883–1896).
Tryggve Juul Møller Forlag. Oslo, Norway.
Gaborit-Chopin D. 1978. Ivoires du Moyen Age occidental.
Fribourg, Switzerland.
Gad, F. 1967. Grønlands Historie Vol. 1. (of III) Copenhagen,
Denmark.
Gjerland, B., and C. Keller. In press. Graves and churches
of the Norse in the North Atlantic. Journal of the North
Atlantic.
Goldschmidt, A. 1914–1926. Die Elfenbeinskulpturen
I–II. Aus der Zeit der Karolingischen und Sächsischen
Kaiser; III–IV, Aus der Romanischen Zeit. Berlin,
Germany.
Grønlands Historiske Mindesmærker (GHM), vol. I–III
1838–45. Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskrift-Selskab.
Copenhagen. 1976 Facsimile edition by Rosenkilde
and Bagger, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gulløv, H.C. (Ed.). 2004. Grønlands Forhistorie. Gyldendal.
Copenhagen, Denmark.
Halldórsson, Ó. 2001. The Vínland Sagas. Pp. 39–51, In
A. Wawn and Þ. Sigurðardóttir (Eds.). Approaches
to Vínland. Sigurður Nordal Institute, Reykjavík,
Iceland.
Hansen, L.I. 1990. Samisk fangstsamfunn og norsk
høvdingeøkonomi. Novus forlag, Oslo, Norway.
Hansen, L.I., and B. Olsen. 2004. Samenes historie fram
til 1750. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag. Oslo, Norway.
Hannestad K. 1970. Varangian Problems. Scando-Slavica,
Supplementum 1. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hårdh, B. (Ed.). 1988. Trade and exchange in prehistory:
Studies in honour of Berta Stjernquist. Acta archaeologica
Lundensia. Series in 8° minore. Institute of
Archaeology, University of Lund, Sweden. Vol. 16.
Callmer, J. 1994. Urbanization in Scandinavia and the
Baltic Region, c. AD 700–1100. Trading places, centres,
and early urban sites. Pp. 50–90. In Björn Ambrosiani
and Helen Clarke (ed.s): Development around
the Baltic and the North Sea in the Viking Age. Birka
Studies 3. Stockholm, Sweden.
Christensen, A.E. 2000. Ships and navigation. Pp. 86–97,
In W.W. Fitzhugh and E. Ward (Eds.). Vikings. The
North Atlantic Saga. Smithsonian Institution Press in
association with National Museum of Natural History.
Washington, DC, USA and London, UK.
Christiansen, E. 1997. The Northern Crusades. New Edition.
Penguin, London, UK; New York, NY, USA;
Camberwell, Australia; Toronto Canada; New Dehli,
India; Auckland, New Zealand; and Rosebank, South
Africa. First published 1980 Macmillan.
Clarke, H., and B. Ambrosiani. 1995. Towns in the Viking
Age. Revised Edition. Leicester University Press,
London, UK and New York, NY, USA.
Clarke, H.B., and A. Simms (Eds.). 1985. The Comparative
History of Urban Origins in Non-Roman Europe.
BAR International Series 255, Oxford, UK.
Crumlin-Pedersen, O., and O. Olsen (Eds.). 2002. The
Skuldelev Ships I. Topography, Archaeology, History,
Conservation, and Display. The Viking Ship
Museum in Roskilde in cooperation with the Centre
for Maritime Archaeology of the National Museum of
Denmark. Roskilde, Denmark.
Diamond, J. 2004. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail
or Survive. Allen Lane, an imprint of Penguin Books,
London, UK; New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON,
Canada; Dublin, Ireland; Camberwell, Australia; New
Dehli, India; Auckland, New Zealand; and Roesebank,
South Africa.
Dugmore, A.J., D.M. Borthewick, M.J. Church, A.
Dawson, K.J. Edwards, C. Keller, P. Mayewski, T.H.
McGovern, K.-A. Mairs, and G. Sveinbjarnardóttir.
2006. The Role of Climate in Settlement and
Landscape Change in the North Atlantic Islands:
An Assessment of Cumulative Deviations in High-
Resolution Proxy Climate Records. Human Ecology.
Springer Science. Business Media, Inc., Heidelberg,
Germany, and New York, NY, USA.
Dugmore, A.J., C. Keller, T.H. McGovern, A.F. Casely,
and K. Smariowski. 2009. Norse Greenland settlement
and limits to adaptation. Pp. 96–113, In W.N. Adger, I.
Lorenzoni, and K. O'Brien (Eds.). Adapting to Climate
Change. Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Edvardsson, R., and T.H. McGovern. 2005. Archaeological
excavations at Vatnsfjörður 2003–04. Archaeologica
Islandica 4:16–31. Reykjavík, Iceland.
Edvardsson, R., S. Perdikaris, T.H. McGovern, N. Zagor,
and M. Waxman. 2004. Coping with hard times in
NW Iceland: Zooarchaeology, history and landscape
archaeology at Finnbogastaðir in the 18th century. Pp.
20–47, In Lucas, G. (Ed.). Archaeologia Islandica.
Occasional Papers on Icelandic Archaeology No. 3.
Fornleifastofnun Íslands. Reykjavík, Iceland.
Falk, H., and A. Torp. 1992. Etymologisk Ordbog over det
norske og det danske Sprog. 1903–1906. Faximile edition:
Bjørn Ringstrøms Antikvariat, Oslo, Norway.
2010 C. Keller 19
Krivogorskaya Y., S. Perdikaris, and T.H. McGovern
2005a. Fish bones and fishermen: The potential of
Zooarchaeology in the Westfjords. Archaeologica
Islandica 4:31–51.
Krivogorskaya, Y., S. Perdikaris, and T.H. McGovern
2005b. Cleaning up the farm: A later medieval archaeofauna
from Gjögur, a fishing farm of NW Iceland.
Pp. 383–395, In J. Arneborg and B. Grønnow (Eds).
Dynamics of Northern Societies, Proceedings of the
SILA/NABO conference on Arctic and North Atlantic
Archaeology 2004, National Museum of Denmark,
Copenhagen, Denmark.
Krogh, K.J. 1982. Erik den rødes Grønland. Qalunaatsiaaqarfik Grønland. Nationalmuseets forlag. Copenhagen,
Denmark.
Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder
(KLNM). 1956–1978. (i.e., Encyclopedia for the
Nordic Middle Ages) Volumes 1–21. Rosenkilde and
Bagger, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lajus, J., A.V. Kraikovski, and A. Yurchenko. 2010. The
fisheries of the Russian North, c. 1300-1850. Pp. 41–
64, In D.J. Starkey, J.Th. Thór, and I. Heidbrink (Eds.).
A History of the North Atlantic Fisheries. Volume 1:
From Early Times to the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Verlag
H.M Hauschild GmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Larsson, L.M. 1917. The King’s Mirror (Speculum regale
– Konungs skuggsjá). The American-Scandinavian
Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Lewicki, T. 1962. Ecrivains arabes du siècle ix au xvie
traitant de l’ambre jaune de la Baltique et de son importantion
en pays arabes. Folia Orientala 4:1–39.
Liebgott, N.-K. 1985. Elfenben—fra Danmarks middelalder.
Nationalmuseet Forlag, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lindquist, S.-O. (Ed.). 1985. Society and Trade in the
Baltic during the Viking Age. Acta Visbyensia VII.
Visby, Sweden.
Lund, N. (Ed.). 1984. Two Voyagers at the Court of King
Alfred. The ventures of Ohthere and Wulfstan together
with the Description of Northern Europe from the Old
English Orosius. William Sessions, Limited, York,
UK.
Lundebye, I. (Ed.). 2005. Levende historie. Vol. 1 (Popular
historical journal issued in Oslo). P. 9. Lofotfisket
er eldgammelt. Funn avslører kommersielt fiske siden
folkevandringstiden. Oslo, Norway.
Lunden, K. 1978. Korn og kaup. Studiar over priser og
jordbruk på Vestlandet i mellomalderen. Norwegian
University Press, Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø, Norway.
Maixner, B. 2010. Haithabu. Fernhandelszentrum zwischen
den Welten. Begleitband zur Ausstellung im
Wikinger Museum Haithabu. Archäologishes Landesmuseum
in der Stiftung Schleswig-Holsteinische
Landesmuseum Schloss Gottorf, Ralf Bleite, Claus
von Carnap-Bornheim.
Martin, J. 1986. Treasures of the Land of Darkness. The
Fur Trade and its Significance for Medieval Russia.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
McAnany, P., and N. Yoffee. 2010. Questioning Collapse.
Human Resilience, Ecological Vulnerability, and the
Aftermath of Empire. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.
Hårdh, B. 1996. Silver in the Viking Age. A Regional-
Economic Study. Acta Archaeologica Lundensia.
Series in 8° minore, No. 25. Almquist and Wiksell
Inernational, Stockholm, Sweden.
Haywood, J. 1995. The Penguin Historical Atlas of the
Vikings. Penquin Books, London, UK.
Heggstad, L., F. Hodnebø, and E. Simensen. 1997. Norrøn
ordbok. 4. utgåva av Gamalnorsk ordbok ved Hægstad
og Torp. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo, Norway. Based
on: Marius Hægstad and Alf Torp: Gamalnorsk ordbok.
1909
Helle, K. 1974. Norge blir en stat 1130–1319. Handbok i
Norges historie, iii, Oslo, Norway.
Helle, K. 1982. Kongssete og kjøpstad. Bergen bys historie
Vol. 1. Bergen, Norway.
Helle, K. 2005. The position of the Faroes and other
“tributary lands” in the medieval Norwegian Dominion.
Pp. 11–21, In A. Mortensen and S.V. Arge (Eds.).
Viking and Norse in the North Atlantic. Select Papers
from the Proceedings of the Fourteenth Viking Congress,
Tórshavn, 19–30 July 2001. Tórshavn, Faroe
Islands.
Henriksen, J.E. 1995. Hellegropene: Fornminner fra
en funntom periode. Master Thesis. University of
Tromsø, Norway.
Hollander, L.M. 1999. Heimskringla. History of the Kings
of Norway. The American-Scandinavian Foundation.
University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA.
Ingstad, A.S. 1977. The Discovery of a Norse Settlement
in America. Excavations at L’Anse aux Meadows,
Newfoundland 1961–1968. Norwegian University
Press, Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø, Norway.
Ingstad, H. 1985. The Norse Discovery of America. Vol.
II. The Historical Background and the Evidence of
the Norse Settlement Discovered in Newfoundland.
Norwegian University Press, Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger,
Tromsø, Norway.
Jankuhn, H. 1985. Haithabu. Ein Handelsplatz der
Wikingerzeit (Eighth Edition). Wachholtz, Neumünster,
Neumünster, Germany.
Kars, H. 1985. Early Medieval Dorestad, an Archaeo-
Petrological Study. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands.
Keller, C. 1989. The Eastern Settlement reconsidered.
Some analyses of Norse Medieval Greenland. Ph.D.
Dissertation. University of Oslo, Norway. Pdf version
available on the NABO web-site at http://www.nabohome.
org/. Accessed November 2009.
Keller, C. 2001 Vínland etter Ingstad. Pp. 67–90, In J.R.
Hagland and S. Supphellen (Eds.). Leiv Eiriksson,
Helge Ingstad og Vinland. Kjelder og tradisjonar.
Innlegg ved eit seminar i Regi av Det Kongelige Norske
Videnskabers Selskab 13–14 oktober 2000. Tapir
Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim, Norway.
Kirpichnikov, A.N., and L.A. Gubchevskaya. 2002.
Staraya Ladoga. History and Landmarks. Kirpichnikov,
A.N. 1989 Staraja Ladoga/Alt-Ladoga und seine
überregionalen Beziehungen im 8. - 10. Jahrhundert.
Pp 307-337, In M. Müller-Wille (Ed.). Oldenburg -
Wolin - Staraja Ladoga - Novgorod - Kiev. Handel
und Handelsverbindungen im südlichen und östlichen
Ostseeraum während des frühen Mittelalters. Berich
der Römisch-Germanischen Kommision, 69. Mainz,
Germany.
20 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Noonan, T.S. 1985. Khazaria as an intermediary between
Islam and eastern Europe in the second half of the
ninth century: The numismatic perspective. Archivum
Eurasiae Medii Aevi 5 (1985):179–204.
Noonan, T.S. 1986. Why the Vikings First Came to Russia.
Pp. 321–348, In Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas
34, Stuttgart, Germany. Also published in Noonan
1998 (below).
Noonan, T.S. 1989a. The impact of the silver crisis in
Islam upon Novgorod’s trade with the Baltic. Pp
411–147, In M. Müller-Wille (Ed.). Oldenburg – Wolin
– Staraja Ladoga – Novgorod – Kiev. Handel und
Handelsverbindungen im südliches und östlichen
Ostseeraum während des frühen Mittelalters. Bericht
der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission, 69, Mainz,
Germany.
Noonan, T.S. 1989b. The Millennium of Russia’s first
Perestrojka: The Origins of a Kievan Glass Industry
under Prince Vladimir. Kennan Institute for Advanced
Russian Studies, Washington, DC, USA.
Noonan, T.S. 1992. Byzantium and the Khazars: A special
relationship? Pp. 109–132, In J. Shepherd and S.
Franklin (Eds.). Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from
the Twenty-fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine
Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Variorium, Aldershot,
UK.
Noonan, T.S. 1994a. What can archaeology tell us about
the economy of Khazaria? The archaeology of the
steppes: Methods and strategies. Pp. 331–345, In B.
Genito (Ed.). Papers from the International Symposium
held in Naples 9–12 November 1992. Istituto
Universitario Orientale, Napoli, Italy.
Noonan, T.S. 1994b. The Vikings in the east: Coins and
commerce. Pp. 215–236, In B. Ambrosiania and H.
Clarke (Eds.). Development around the Baltic and the
North Sea in the Viking Age. Viking Congress No. 3,
Stockholm, Sweden.
Noonan, T.S. 1997. Scandinavians in European Russia.
Pp. 134–155, In P. Sawyer (Ed.). The Oxford Illustrated
History of the Vikings. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, UK.
Noonan, T.S. 1998. The Islamic World, Russia, and the
Vikings, 750–900. The Numismatic Evidence. Ashgate
Variorum, Aldershot, UK. This is a collection of
previously published articles, all of which are referenced
separately.
Nørlund, P. 1936. Viking Settlers in Greenland and their
Descendants during Five Hundred Years. London, UK.
Nydal, R. 1977. Radiocarbon Dating of Material from
L’Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland. Pp. 341–356,
In A.S. Ingstad: The Discovery of a Norse Settlement
in America. Excavations at L’Anse aux Meadows,
Newfoundland 1961–1968. Norwegian University
Press, Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø, Norway.
Odelman, E. (Translator). 1986. Boken om Ansgar. Rimbert:
Ansgars liv. With comments by Anders Ekenberg,
Carl Fredrik Hallencreutz, Sven Helander, Alf Härelin,
Eva Odelman. Proprius Förlag. Stockholm, Sweden.
Perdikaris, S. 1996. Scaly Heads and Tales: Detecting
Commercialization in Early Fisheries. Pp. 21–33, In
A. Morales (Ed.). Ichthyoarchaeology and the Archaeological
Record. 8th ICAZ Conference Proceedings.
Archaeofauna 5. Madrid, Spain.
McGovern T.H. 1985. The arctic frontier of Norse Greenland.
Pp. 275–323, In S. Green and S. Perlman (Eds.).
The Archaeology of Frontiers and Boundaries. Academic
Press, New York NY, USA.
McGovern T.H. 1992. Zooarchaeology of the Vatnahverfi.
Pp, 93–107, In C.L. Vebæk (Ed.). Vatnahverfi: An Inland
District of the Eastern Settlement in Greenland.
Meddelelser om Grønland, Man and Society 17. Copenhagen,
Denmark.
McGovern, T.H. 2009. The Archaeofauna. Pp 168–252,
In G. Lucas (Ed.). Hofstaðir. Excavations of a Viking
Age Feasting Hall in North-Eastern Iceland. Institute
of Archaeology, Reykjavík. Monograph No. 1. Reykjavík,
Iceland.
Müller-Wille, M. 1988. Hedeby und sein Umland. Pp.
271–278, In B. Hårdh (Ed.). Trade and Exchange in
Prehistory: Studies in Honour of Berta Stjernquist
Acta Archaeologica Lundensia. Series in 8° minore.
Institute of Archaeology, University of Lund, Sweden.
Vol. 16.
Müller-Wille, M. (Ed.). 1989. Oldenburg – Wolin – Staraja
Ladoga – Novgorod – Kiev. Handel und Handelsverbindungen
im südliches und östlichen Ostseeraum
während des frühen Mittelalters. Bericht der Römisch-
Germanischen Kommission, 69, Mainz, Germany.
Munch, G.S., O.S. Johansen, and E. Roesdahl (Eds.). 2003.
Borg in Lofoten. A chieftain’s farm in North Norway.
Arkeologisk skriftserie 1. Lofotr Vikingmuseet på
Borg. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway.
Munch, P.A. 1864. Pavelige nuntiers regnskabs—og
dagbøger førte under tiende-opkrævningen i Norden
1282–1334. Christiania, Oslo, Norway.
Näsman, U., and E. Roesdahl. 2003. Scandinavian and European
perspectives—Borg I:1. Pp. 283–297, In G.S.
Munch, O.S. Johansen, and E. Roesdahl (Eds.). Borg
in Lofoten. A Chieftain’s Farms in North Norway. Lofotr,
Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway.
Nielsen, A.R. 2003. Viking Age Chieftains in Lofoten—
The old Norse sources. Pp. 273–281, In G.S. Munch,
O.S. Johansen, and E. Roesdahl (Eds.). Borg in Lofoten.
A Chieftain’s Farms in North Norway. Lofotr,
Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway.
Nielsen, A.R. 2010. Norwegian Fisheries, c. 1100-
1850 Pp. 83–109, In D.J. Starkey, J.Th. Thór, and
I. Heidbrink (Eds.). A History of the North Atlantic
Fisheries. Volume 1: From Early Times to the Mid-
Nineteenth Century. Verlag H.M Hauschild GmbH,
Bremen, Germany.
Noonan, T.S. 1980a. When and how dirhams first reached
Russia: A numismatic critique of the Pirenne theory.
Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 21:401–469.
Noonan, T.S. 1980b. Monetary circulation in early medieval
Rus: A study of Volga Bulgar dirham finds. Russian
History/Histoire Russe 7 (part 3):294–311.
Noonan, T.S. 1980c. The circulation of Byzantine coins
in Kievan Rus. Byzantine Studies/Etudes Byzantines
7:143–181.
Noonan, T.S. 1981. Ninth-century dirham hoards from
European Russia: A preliminary analysis. Pp. 47–118,
In M.A.S. Blackburn and D.M. Metcalf (Eds.). Viking
Age Coinage in the Northern Lands. BAR Interntational
Series 122. Oxford, UK.
2010 C. Keller 21
Roesdahl, E. 1995. Hvalrostand, elfenben og nordboerne
i Grønland. Odense University Press, Odense, Denmark.
Roesdahl, E. 2000. Walrus ivory and other northern
luxuries: Their importance for Norse voyages and
settlements in Greenland and America. Pp. 145–152,
In Shannon Lewis-Simpson (Ed.). Vínland Revisited:
The Norse World at the Turn of the First Millennium.
Selected Papers from the Viking Millennium Symposium,
15–24 September 2000, Newfoundland and
Labrador. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.
Roesdahl, E. 2005. Walrus ivory: Demand, supply, workshops,
and Greenland. Pp. 182–191, In A. Mortensen
and S.V. Arge (Eds.). Vikings and Norse in the North
Atlantic. Tórshavn. Førøya Froðskaparfelag 2005
(Annales Societatis Scientiarum Færoensis. Supplementa
44).
Sarfatij, H., W.J.H. Verwers, and P.J. Woltering (Eds.).
1999. In discussion with the past: Archaeological
studies presented to W.A. van Es. Authors: H. Sarfatij,
W.J.H. Verwers, P.J. Woltering, and W.A. van
Es. Zwolle Amersfoort. Foundation for Promoting
Archaeology. In cooperation with the National Service
for the Archaeological Heritage, Zwolle Amersfoort,
The Netherlands.
Sawyer, B., and P. Sawyer. 1993. Medieval Scandinavia.
From Conversion to Reformation, circa 800–1500.
The Nordic Series, Volume 17. University of Minnesota
Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sawyer, P.H. 1987. Kings and Vikings. Scandinavia and
Europe AD 700–1100. Routledge, London, UK and
New York, NY, USA.
Sawyer, P. 2000. Scotland, Ireland, and Iceland. Norwegian
settlers in the ninth century. Pp 29–35, In S.
Lewis-Simpson (Ed.). Vínland Revisited: the Norse
World at the Turn of the First Millennium. St. John’s,
Newfoundland, Canada.
Schanche, A. 1986. Nordnorsk jernalderarkeologi. Et sosialgeografisk perspektiv. MasterS Thesis. University
of Tromsø, Norway.
Schietzel, K. (Ed.). 1969–. Series: Berichte über die Ausgrabungen
in Haithabu. Neumünster, Germany.
Schietzel, K. 1981. Stand der Siedlungsarchäologishen
Forschung in Haithabu—Ergebnisse und Probleme.
Berichte über die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu 16. Neumünster,
Germany.
Schietzel, K. 1985. Hauthabu: A study on the development
of early urban settlements in northern Europe.
Pp. 147–181, In H.B. Clarke and A. Simms (Eds.). The
Comparative History of Urban Origins in Non-Roman
Europe. BAR International Series 255, Oxford, UK.
Schmidt, K.R. 1971. The Varangian Problem. A brief
history of the controversy. Pp. 7–20, In Varangian
Problems. Scando-Slavica. Supplementum 1. Report
on the first international symposium on the theme
The Eastern Connections of the Nordic Peoples in the
Viking Period and the Early Middle Ages. Moesgaard,
University of Aarhus 7th–11th October 1968. Copenhagen,
Munksgaard, Denmark.
Seaver, K.A. 1996. The Frozen Echo. Greenland and the
Exploration of North America, ca. A.D. 1000–1500.
Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA.
Perdikaris, S. 1998. The Transition to a Commercial
Economy: Lofoten Fishing in the Middle Ages, A Preliminary
Report. 7th ICAZ Conference Proceedings,
September 1994, Konstanz, Germany. Anthropozoologica
No. 25–26/1997:505–510.
Perdikaris, S. 1999. From chiefly provisioning to commercial
fishery: Long-term economic change in Arctic
Norway. World Archaeology 30(3):388–402.
Perdikaris, S., and T.H. McGovern. 2007. Walrus, cod fish,
and chieftains: Intensification in the Norse North Atlantic.
Pp. 193–216, In T.L. Thurston and C.T. Fisher
(Eds.). Seeking A Richer Harvest: The Archaeology of
Subsistence Intensification, Innovation, and Change.
Springer Science. Business Media, New York, NY.
Perdikaris S., and T.H. McGovern. 2008a. Codfish and
kings, seals and subsistence: Norse marine resource
use in the North Atlantic. Pp. 157–190, In R. Torben
and J. Erlandson (Eds). Human Impacts on Marine
nvironments, UCLA Press Historical Ecology Series,
Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Perdikaris, S., and T.H. McGovern. 2008b. Viking Age
economics and the origins of commercial cod fisheries
in the North Atlantic. Pp. 61–90, In L. Sickling and
D. Abreu-Ferreira (Eds). The North Atlantic Fisheries
in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Period: Interdisciplinary
Approaches in History, Archaeology, and
Biology, Brill Publishers, The Netherlands.
Perdikaris, S., C. Amundsen, and T.H. McGovern. 2001.
Zooarchaeology of Tjarnargata 3C, Reykjavík, Iceland,
report on file at the Archaeological Institute
of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. Modified version in
review with Environmental Archaeology.
Perdikaris, S., T.H. McGovern, Á. Einarsson, and J.
Sidell 2004a. Inland sites and coastal connections:
Patterns of wild animal exploitation in settlement
age Mývatn District, northern Iceland. NORSEC
Zooarchaeology Laboratory Reports No. 4. New
York, NY, USA.
Perdikaris, S., T.H McGovern, Y. Krivogorskaya, and
M. Waxman. 2004b. Early modern fisher-farmers
at Finnbogastaðir and Gjögur in northwest Iceland.
Pp. 139–144, In R. Gonzales (Ed). Presence of the
Archaeo-ichthyology in Mexico. ICAZ Fish Remains
Working Group 2003, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Pirenne, H. 1939. Mohammed and Charlemagne. Unwin
University Books, London, UK.
Resi, H.G. 1979. Die Specksteinfunde aus Haithabu.
Berichte über die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu. 14. Neumünster,
Germany.
Resi, H.G. 1987. Reflections on Viking Age local trade
in stone products. Pp. 95–102, In J. Knirk and M.
Blindheim (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth Viking
Congress, Larkollen, Norway 1985. Series: Universitetets
Oldsaksamlings Skrifter Ny rekke, Volume 9.
Oslo, Norway.
Resi H.G. 1990. Die Wetz- und Schleifsteine aus Haithabu.
Berichte über die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu.
Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landesmuseum für Vorund
Frühgeschichte. Schleswig, Schloss Gottorp,
Neumünster, Germany.
Robinson, C.H. 1921. Anskar, The Apostle of the North,
801–865, translated from the Vita Anskarii by Bishop
Rimbert his fellow missionary and sucessor. SPCK,
London, UK.
22 Journal of the North Atlantic Volume 3
Seaver, K.A. 2009. Desirable teeth: The medieval trade
in Arctic and African ivory. Journal of Global History
(2009)4:271–292. London School of Economics and
Political Science. [Originally published in Norwegian:
Ettertraktete tenner: Middelalderens handel med
hvalrosstann og afrikansk elfenbein. Pp, 231–250, In
Historisk tidsskrift 2, 2006. Oslo, Norway.
Seaver, K.A. 2010. The Last Vikings: The Epic Story of
the Great Norse Voyagers. I.B. Tauris and Co., Ltd.,
London, UK.
Sivertsen, E. 1980. Selene. Pp. 310–349, In R. Frislid and
A. Semb-Johansen. Norges dyr. Vol. 1 Pattedyr. J.W.
Cappelens forlag, Oslo, Norway.
Stalsberg, A. 1979. Skandinaviske vikingetidsfunn fra det
gammelrussiske riket. Fornvännen (Journal of Swedish
Antiquarian Research) 74:151–160.
S t a l s b e rg, A. 1982. Scandinavian relations
with Northwestern Russia during the Viking
age: The archaeological evidence
Journal of Baltic Studies 13:267–295. Available online
at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ftinterfa
ce~content=a770906931~fulltext=713240930~frm=
content.
Starkey, D.J., and A.R. Nielsen. 2010. Environment and
Ecology. Pp. 38–40, In D.J. Starkey, J.Th. Thór, and
I. Heidbrink (Eds.). A History of the North Atlantic
Fisheries. Volume 1: From Early Times to the Mid-
Nineteenth Century. Verlag H.M Hauschild GmbH,
Bremen, Germany.
Stefánsson, M. 1986. Bergen—Islands første hovedstad.
Pp. 70–87, In I. Sølvberg (Ed.). Kjøpstad og rikssentrum.
Series: Onsdagskvelder i Bryggens Museum vol.
II. Bryggens Museum, Bergen, Norway.
Stefánsson, M. 1993. Iceland. Pp. 311–319, In P. Pulsiano
(Ed.). Medieval Scandinavia: An Encyclopedia. New
York, NY, USA and London, UK.
Steinnes, A. 1936. Mål, vekt og verderekning i Noreg. First
published in Nordisk Kultur no. 30. Facsimille edition
in: Brøgger, A.W. and Steinnes, A. Gammel mål og vekt
i Norge. Kildeforlaget, Oslo, Norway, 1982.
Storå, N. 1977. De ryska klostren och Kola-samernas rätt
til jakt och fiske. In K. Bergsland (Ed.). Samenes og
sameområdenes rettslige stilling historisk belyst. Institutt
for sammenlignende kulturforskning. Serie A:
Forelesninger XXVIII, Bergen, Norway.
Svane, G.O. 1983. Nestors krønike. Beretningen om de
svundne år. Translated and annotated. Wormianum,
Højbjerg, Denmark.
Tegengren, H. 1962. Valrosstanden i världshandeln.
Nordenskiöld-samfunnets Skrifter XXII, Helsinki,
Finland.
The Complete Sagas of the Icelanders. 1997. Vol. I. Vinland.
Warriors and Poets. In Viðar Hreinsson (Ed.).
Viking Age Classics. Leifur Eiríksson Publishing,
Reykjavík, Iceland.
Thór, J.Th. 2010. Icelandic Fisheries, c. 900-1900.
Pp. 323–349, In D.J. Starkey, J.Th. Thór, and I.
Heidbrink (Eds). A History of the North Atlantic
Fisheries. Volume 1: From Early Times to the Mid-
Nineteenth Century. Verlag H.M Hauschild GmbH,
Bremen, Germany.
Tschan, F.J. (Translator). 2002. The History of the Archbishops
of Hamburg-Bremen. By Adam of Bremen.
Translated with an introduction and notes by Francis J.
Tschan, with a new introduction and selected bibliography
by Tomothy Reuter. Columbia University Press,
New York, NY, USA.
Þorláksson, H. 1991. Vaðmál og verðlag. Vaðmál i utanlandsviðskiptum
og búskap Íslendinga á 13. og 14.
öld. (Ph.D. at Háskoli Íslands). Reykjavík, Iceland.
Þorláksson, H. 1999. Gásar og den islandske handelen i
middelalderen. Pp. 71–82, In A. Christophersen and A.
Dybdahl (Eds.). Gásir—en internasjonal handelsplass
i Nord-Atlanteren. Tapir, Trondheim, Norway.
Þorláksson, H. 2001. The Vínland Sagas in contemporary
light. Pp. 63–78, In A. Wawn and Þ. Sigurðardóttir
(Eds.). Approaches to Vínland. Sigurður Nordal Institute,
Reykjavík, Iceland.
Van Es, W.A. 1969. Excavations at Dorestad: A prepreliminary
report: 1967–1968. Berichten van de
Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek
19:183–207.
Van Es, W.A., and W.J.H. Verwers. 1980. Excavations at
Dorestad 1—The Harbour. Hogstraat 1 (Nederlandse
Oudheden 9), Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Van Es W.A., and W.J.H. Verwers 2009. Excavations at
Dorestad: Hoogstraat 0, II–IV, with contributions by
J. van Doesburg, H. Enno van Gelder, and C. Isings.
Series: Nederlandse oudheden / Rijksdienst voor het
Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek. Rijksdienst voor
Archeologie, Cultuurlandschap en Monumenten, Amersfoort,
The Netherlands.
Vasaru, M.K. 2003. Bjarmaland: A northerly perspective
to Norwegian-Russian contacts. Pp. 57–86, In Middelalderforum.
Tverrfaglig tidsskrift for middelalderstudenter.
3. årgang No. 1–2/2003 Universitetet i Oslo,
Utgis av Foreningen Middelalderforum, Norway.
Vésteinsson, O., T.H. McGovern, and C. Keller 2002.
Enduring impacts: Social and environmental aspects
of Viking Age settlements in Iceland and Greenland.
Archaeologia Islandica 2:98–136.
Vilkuna, K. 1956. Bjarmer og Bjarmaland, Volume 1. Pp.
647–651, In Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk
Middelalder (KLNM) 1956–1978 (i.e., Encyclopedia
for the Nordic Middle Ages). Rosenkilde and Bagger,
Copenhagen, Denmark.
Endnotes
1Landnám translates literally as “the taking of land”, i.e.
the act of colonization. It also exists as a noun, indicating
“the section of land taken”, i.e., a person’s land claim.
2This story is according to the Icelandic “Landnámabók” –
The Book of Settlement – (Benediktsson 1986:132).
3In present-day Igaliku.
4Of course, the two taxes cannot be compared directly; the
Icelandic payment is an annual tax, and the Greenlandic
payment is a special crusade tax. Still, it is a safe assumption
that the population in Iceland was at least ten times
the population in Greenland; the Faroes and Greenland
were more comparable in size. There is a good chance
that the price of the walrus tusks increased tremendously
on their way across the North Atlantic. Still, the examples
give an indication of the value of tusks in Europe.
2010 C. Keller 23
5In comparison, the near contemporary Skuldelev 1 was a
fully fledged, ocean-going cargo ship with a length of 16
meters, i.e., only 2 meters more than Skuldelev 3, but with
an estimated cargo capacity of ca. 36 tons (Crumlin-Pedersen
and Olsen 2002:97–140, in particular 136–137).
6The region around the Trondheims Fjord and the city of
Trondheim (medieval Nidarós).
7Lee Hollander translates Ohthere’s Biarmas and Biarmaland
with Permia and Permians in the English version of
the text (Hollander 1999:140), suggesting a link with the
fur trade network in the Perm and Bulgar region, much
further east (see section 4, below). Sawyer (1987:121)
references Vilkuna (1956), who explains that the Finnish
word perm indicates a travelling merchant.
8Skáli = Norse traditional long-house.
9Pieces of silver jewelry or coins cut into small bits, often
corresponding to local weight units of the time, see Hårdh
(1996) for regional distribution.
10The regional law of the Trøndelag, the area around the
Trondheim Fjord in mid-Norway.
11In the present-day town of Vardø, not far from the present-
day Russian-Norwegian border.