Regular articles
Special Issues
Caribbean Naturalist
CANA Home
Range and Scope
Board of Editors
Staff
Editorial Workflow
Publication Charges
Subscriptions
Other EH Journals
Northeastern Naturalist
Southeastern Naturalist
Neotropical Naturalist
Urban Naturalist
Prairie Naturalist
Journal of North American Bat
Research
Eastern Paleontologist
Journal of the North Atlantic
eBio
Using Biodiversity Metrics to Guide Conservation Planning in Altered Tropical Landscapes
Kathryn E. Battle1, Krishna Pacifici2, Jaime A. Collazo3,*, and Brian J. Reich4
1North Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 2Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 3US Geological Survey, North Carolina Cooperative Fish, and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. 4Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. *Corresponding author.
Caribbean Naturalist, No. 77 (2020)
Abstract
Biodiversity metrics are frequently used to guide conservation planning because they can summarize biogeographical attributes of plant and animal communities quickly and at multiple scales. Attributes include habitat features of high conservation value, representativeness, and redundancy of biological communities. We conducted a rapid ecological assessment of resident avian species in the west-central mountainous region of Puerto Rico in 2015, a landscape dominated by coffee cultivation. We focused on this landscape because shade-grown and restored shade-grown coffee plantations offer an opportunity to complement protected habitat (e.g., reserves) to enhance species persistence. We used species richness, which tallies the number of unique species, and a quadratic entropy index of diversity, which incorporates interspecific taxonomic differentiation to evaluate species representativeness and redundancy across sun- and shade-grown coffee plantations and secondary forest. We surveyed 120 sites, calculating both metrics using species-specific occupancy probabilities estimated from community-level occupancy models. Species representativeness and redundancy were high as neither metric was able to discriminate among habitat types, possibly because plant communities were redundant, and the avian community was dominated by species adept at exploiting altered habitats. Similarly, we could not discriminate among avian communities modeling each biodiversity metric as a function of site-specific habitat covariates. Our findings and available knowledge on avian community demographics suggest that conservation strategies could couple protected habitat (e.g., reserves) and restored habitat (e.g., coffee plantations) to enhance species diversity and persistence across human-modified landscapes.
Download Full-text pdf (Accessible only to subscribers. To subscribe click here.)